Catholics ~ can you properly explain this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wesley7
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have.

And most of the responses say that unification is not necessary because we don’t need the Pope.
Yep. That’s like saying that the United States doesn’t need a president. The Catholic Church is like the U.S. It is a Federal ( Federated ) system with each governing its own, yet under the auspices and direction of a central authority to guide it ( The Catholic Church is NOT a Democracy ).

Because the Orthodox ( and Protestants ) have no central authority to guide its direction, they have split into many autocephalic units, each with its own set of rules and each going merrily its own way. One thing though, both the Orthodox and Protestants are united in their dislike of the Catholic Church ( I believe the reasons being not only political, but also mis-understanding and jealousy…)

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
Yep. That’s like saying that the United States doesn’t need a president. The Catholic Church is like the U.S. It is a Federal ( Federated ) system with each governing its own, yet under the auspices and direction of a central authority to guide it ( The Catholic Church is NOT a Democracy ).

Because the Orthodox ( and Protestants ) have no central authority to guide its direction, they have split into many autocephalic units, each with its own set of rules and each going merrily its own way. One thing though, both the Orthodox and Protestants are united in their dislike of the Catholic Church ( I believe the reasons being not only political, but also mis-understanding and jealousy…)

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
Indeed. God knew what He was doing huh? 🙂

Another example of a faith that lacks a central authority is Islam. And as a result, there is no one to tell the people that are justifying murder in the name of Islam to call them out, tell them they’re wrong, and cast them out of the faith.

God’s designs are always best! When humans do the designing of things, confusion is often the result.
 
=guanophore;6744570]This is not true! I will agree that they are isolated from the successor of Peter, but it was Peter who started the line of succession in Antioch, and other points East. The successors installed by Paul during his journeys are all valid successors. This is why the Roman Communion recognizes the Apsostolicity and Sacraments among our Eastern brethren.
The reason they refrain is because they don’t consider them valid. They consider that the Roman Church separated herself from communion many centuries ago and has not returned.
This dear friend borders on the absurd. Your saying that ROME chose to seperate from the EAST?
From their point of view, the Latin Rite has separated herself, and as further evidence of apostasy, cite the Protestant Reformation, which they see as the spawn of the Latin innovations to the faith. They are stronly urging us to reconcile that “mess” created before approaching them to reconcile. They see the Reformation as a problem created by the Latin rite that should be cleaned up by it.
This position IF TRUE??? is not even worth discusion.
From their point of view, the Pope has inflated himself to the status of “pontiff, vicar, and visible head” and taken upon the status of infallibility, doing that which is anathema, changing things handed down to us from the Apostles, by “adding”. It is the same charge the Protestants level, but for different reasons.
I’m uncelar if your in agreemnt with this nonsense? Matt. 16:16-19 is exceedingly clear; and th Apostles and the Early Fathers had no disagreement on the issue.
Keys


“The key is the symbol of the authority of the vizier (the major domo/ prime minister/ treasurer/ vicar) of a royal household. He literally carried the keys attached to his belt, with which to open the storehouses and other treasuries on behalf of the king. In Scripture only the Messiah and the Apostle Peter are spoken of as having this authority. The Messiah is the Vizier of the great King, the Eternal Father, bringing to earth the treasure of Redemption from the Storehouse of the Father’s mercy. Peter is the Messiah’s Vizier, the Vicar of Christ, who through his successors in every age is head of the Church on earth which distributes those treasures in the name of the Lord.(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mt 16:19) To the other apostles is given the power to bind and to loose, but not the supreme power of the keys (Mt 18:18)”.

“The key is the symbol of the authority of the vizier (the major domo/ prime minister/ treasurer/ vicar) of a royal household. He literally carried the keys attached to his belt, with which to open the storehouses and other treasuries on behalf of the king. In Scripture only the Messiah and the Apostle Peter are spoken of as having this authority. The Messiah is the Vizier of the great King, the Eternal Father, bringing to earth the treasure of Redemption from the Storehouse of the Father’s mercy. Peter is the Messiah’s Vizier, the Vicar of Christ, who through his successors in every age is head of the Church on earth which distributes those treasures in the name of the Lord.(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mt 16:19) To the other apostles is given the power to bind and to loose, but not the supreme power of the keys (Mt 18:18).”

“The key is the symbol of the authority of the vizier (the major domo/ prime minister/ treasurer/ vicar) of a royal household. He literally carried the keys attached to his belt, with which to open the storehouses and other treasuries on behalf of the king. In Scripture only the Messiah and the Apostle Peter are spoken of as having this authority. The Messiah is the Vizier of the great King, the Eternal Father, bringing to earth the treasure of Redemption from the Storehouse of the Father’s mercy. Peter is the Messiah’s Vizier, the Vicar of Christ, who through his successors in every age is head of the Church on earth which distributes those treasures in the name of the Lord.(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mt 16:19) To the other apostles is given the power to bind and to loose, but not the supreme power of the keys (Mt 18:18).”

**Isaiah 22:22: **
I will place the key of the House of David on his shoulder; when he opens, no one shall shut, when he shuts, no one shall open.

**Rev. 3:7 : **
"To the angel of the church in Philadelphia, write this: " 'The holy one, the true, who holds the key of David, who opens and no one shall close, who closes and no one shall open, says this:

Matthew 16:19 :
I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

Matthew 18:18 :
Amen, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
This is not an accurate statement. They also think the Roman Pontiff can repent, and return to the fold.
God willing this is the first and lst time I will hear such nonsense.

I think you understanding of sacraments may need some polishing. A person who recieves a sacrament in an unworthy manner brings grave consequences onto himself.

TRUE, but what does it hve to do with the rest of the post?
 
Indeed. God knew what He was doing huh? 🙂

Another example of a faith that lacks a central authority is Islam. And as a result, there is no one to tell the people that are justifying murder in the name of Islam to call them out, tell them they’re wrong, and cast them out of the faith.

God’s designs are always best! When humans do the designing of things, confusion is often the result.
Islam may not have a central authority but they are united in their dislike, to the point of hatred, for the westerner. Since Islam is more a political, rather than religious, way of life it may not need a central authority. This may be due more to tribal mentality than religious. We should also keep in mind that “family honor” is utmost for the tribe and the killing of anyone, family or ousider, is of no consequence as long as “family honor” is maintained. This attitude spills into all of Islam.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom haMeshiach
 
Because the Orthodox ( and Protestants ) have no central authority to guide its direction, they have split into many autocephalic units, each with its own set of rules and each going merrily its own way. One thing though, both the Orthodox and Protestants are united in their dislike of the Catholic Church ( I believe the reasons being not only political, but also mis-understanding and jealousy…)

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
I’m going to that you are simply ignorant of Orthodoxy (not an uncommon condition) and not intentionally trying to mislead people who read your posts. Each of the Catholic Churches has it’s own set of canon law, or “rules” if you will. They each have their own synods that govern them, not some “central authority.” Perhaps before you speak in such an unflattering way about Orthodoxy you should step out of your Latin box and learn a little about your own traditions. There is an Eastern Catholicism board right here on Catholic Answers. You would serve yourself well to check it out. 😉

Yours in Christ
Joe
 
I’m going to that you are simply ignorant of Orthodoxy (not an uncommon condition) and not intentionally trying to mislead people who read your posts. Each of the Catholic Churches has it’s own set of canon law, or “rules” if you will. They each have their own synods that govern them, not some “central authority.” Perhaps before you speak in such an unflattering way about Orthodoxy you should step out of your Latin box and learn a little about your own traditions. There is an Eastern Catholicism board right here on Catholic Answers. You would serve yourself well to check it out. 😉

Yours in Christ
Joe
Yes, each has its own set of rules as far as discipline and the liturgy goes since each Church has an ethnic identity. But, all subscribe to the canon and “rules” of Catholicism. For if not, then they would not be in union with Rome and each other.

As for the “synods” whatever each Church formulates or comes up with is always submitted to Rome to make sure that it is within the teachings of Catholicism proper and that no errors have been made. All accept and subscribe to the Magisterium. If this is not submitting to a central authority, then what is?

I think that you should come out of your “little box”, drop your dislike and mis-understanding of Catholicism and learn a few things.

PAX DOMINI :SIGNOFCROSS:

Shalom Aleichem
 
Dear brother Javl,
Yes, each has its own set of rules as far as discipline and the liturgy goes since each Church has an ethnic identity. But, all subscribe to the canon and “rules” of Catholicism. For if not, then they would not be in union with Rome and each other.

As for the “synods” whatever each Church formulates or comes up with is always submitted to Rome to make sure that it is within the teachings of Catholicism proper and that no errors have been made. All accept and subscribe to the Magisterium. If this is not submitting to a central authority, then what is?
Are you aware that the Eastern/Oriental Catholic Churches have their own Code of Canon laws, distinct from the Latin Code? They are different in many places. Here is one of those distinctions that is relevant for your discussion with brother Josephdaniel:

**Canon 110 - The synod of bishops of the patriarchal Church is exclusively competent to make laws for the entire patriarchal Church **

I hope the highlighted portion impresses upon you the actual state of affairs in the relationship between the See of Rome and the other Patriarchates. It is not what you percieve.

Blessings,
Marduk
 
Dear brother Javl,

Are you aware that the Eastern/Oriental Catholic Churches have their own Code of Canon laws, distinct from the Latin Code? They are different in many places. Here is one of those distinctions that is relevant for your discussion with brother Josephdaniel:

Canon 110 - The synod of bishops of the patriarchal Church is exclusively competent to make laws for the entire patriarchal Church

I hope the highlighted portion impresses upon you the actual state of affairs in the relationship between the See of Rome and the other Patriarchates. It is not what you percieve.

Blessings,
Marduk
Yes I am aware of it. They may do so, change, alter, rewrite, etc. their cannon as long as it does not in essence conflict with the Latin, or other Churches within Catholicism. And they all submit to the central authority. God Bless.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
Yes I am aware of it. They may do so, change, alter, rewrite, etc. their cannon as long as it does not in essence conflict with the Latin, or other Churches within Catholicism. And they all submit to the central authority. God Bless.
Agreed.

It is the same central authority that the Pope must obey - Sacred Tradition.

Blessings,
Marduk
 
This is the text of the bull of excommunication that was used by papal legates to excommunicate the Patriarch of Constantinople and all who follow him.
I thought it was so funny! 😃

WetCatechumen gets TWO thumbs up for that post! 👍👍
 
=Hesychios;6757371]Well yes. Precisely.
Why would it not be worth discussing?
Those who remain ignorant of history are condemned to repeat it.
THANK GOD those who invent it must do likewise.

How dear friend does one “discuss” that which in not true, and cannot be shown to be true. Sems to me, a wast of effort and time.

Love and prayers
 
Dear brother (name removed by moderator),

Anyone who claims that one Church left the other in the sense that one Church has no culpability or less culpability than the other Church for the split, or that one Church or the other did not exist before the time of the split, is not just being ridiculous - he or she is being ABSOLUTELY AND UTTERLY ridiculous.👍

Blessings,
Marduk
 
=(name removed by moderator);6761608]My wife would agree with Hesychios btw, that is the outlook of the majority of the faithful of the Eastern Orthodox Churches. it may differ from our own but it is not inherently ridiculous and we have to accept that is the outlook of the EO if we debate with them.
I will say to Hesychios that i think even those of us who do know history seem to be condemned to repeat it but I’m feeling a bit cynical this afternoon.
SORRY, I spoke out of turn. I know our Catholic Faith but not the EO’s.😊
 
The above is a very fine example of how NOT to engage others in Christian Charity…In all this post demonstrates the reason why the two churches need to proceed, carefully and in Christian Love, through the magisterial offices of each, and not by “street corner polemics” that only serve to stir up passions.

Peace
James
James…So true. I pray for the day when the Church is reunited… 👍 👍 👍
 
Agreed.

It is the same central authority that the Pope must obey - Sacred Tradition.

Blessings,
Marduk
The central authority is really the Magisterium. Sacred Tradition ( capital “T” ) is what the entire Catholic Church adheres to and is what Jesus and the Apostles have taught and is ignored by so-called “Christians” ( Jehovahs Witnesses, Mormons, Unitarians, Christian Science, etc. ).

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
The central authority is really the Magisterium. Sacred Tradition ( capital “T” ) is what the entire Catholic Church adheres to and is what Jesus and the Apostles have taught and is ignored by so-called “Christians” ( Jehovahs Witnesses, Mormons, Unitarians, Christian Science, etc. ).

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
And unfortunately it appears a number of the “Catholics” posting here…:blackeye:
 
The central authority is really the Magisterium. Sacred Tradition ( capital “T” ) is what the entire Catholic Church adheres to and is what Jesus and the Apostles have taught and is ignored by so-called “Christians” ( Jehovahs Witnesses, Mormons, Unitarians, Christian Science, etc. ).
In its most literal sense, the Magisterium is the teaching authority of God, and it doesn’t make sense to separate that from Sacred Tradition.

If you refer to the Magisterium as the College of Bishops, then how exactly does that apply to the local Church? Are you telling me that each time a local Church makes some kind of change, then an Ecumenical Council has to be called to approve it?🤷

Blessings
 
As far as the split between Eastern and Western Churches is concerned, they are both to blame. The West did not leave the East and the East did not leave the West. They left each other. Both at the time acted like spoiled brats with each one wanting to be in control of the entire Church. The West using St. Peter’s prominance and the East using the Emperor’s prominance. The West picked up its bat and gloves and the East took the ball and bases and each went home crying blaming the other for the split. When each admits its guilt in the cause of the split, then, maybe, the Eastern and Western Churches will again be one.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top