Actually the Constitution isn’t as vague as you may think. And there is plenty written about it by those who were arguing for it: thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html
Ron Paul doesn’t know anything about economics so I stopped listening to him. Maybe he has some useful positions but nothing substantial. I support people who have more of a clue about economics than he does.
Sorry for offending. That was certainly not my intention, but when you cite “swaths” of numbers that simply aren’t there in support of Perry as the obvious GOP nominee, you insult my intelligence. You (like myself) are a native Texan, so you must know his negatives in his home state. To sweep that under the carpet is disingenuous.
This is by far the most ignorant statement I have read in this thread. Ron Paul’s position on economics and sound money created the Tea Party movement, the Audit the Fed movement, and a focus on deficit spending, quantitative easing, economic bubbles, and predicted nearly every macroeconomic disaster we’ve had in the last 25 years. Perhaps it is you who knows nothing about economics. Dr. Paul is an Austrian economics disciple, not a Keynesian, so if you subscribe to the Paul Krugman theory of “we need to spend MORE money” solution to life’s problems, then yes it may appear that Ron Paul knows little. However, the fruit is bearing out on Keynes economic theory. You can only be engaged in perpetual war and try to centrally plan the economy for so long before the house of cards comes crashing down around your head.
Here is one thing that is for certain, Romney, Bachman, Perry, Santorum only wish they had a cadre of supporters who were as loyal and passionate about their campaigns as Dr.Paul did.
Lyndon LaRouche had a cadre of loyal and passionate supporters. It didn’t help him. 
ive never talked about this but i would vote for him for president, if i voted. he’d be a good president. i like him alot.
You need more than 4 or 5. And Larouche couldn’t decide if he was a conservative Democrat or a libertarian.
Just another fallacious attack designed to smear the good Doctors name by association. If you know anything about Lyndon LaRouche… He makes a lot of statements about the FEDeral Reserve System but his solutions are to replace it with a European Model Central Bank. Hardly a solution to replace one counterfeiter with another. What so many on this thread seem yet to grasp is that the Age of Central Banking (and Economic Central Planning) are coming to an end. Those here who have supported these illusions in the past should realize their mistakes and rectify their lives, not continue to regurgitate MSM (and the State’s) Propaganda.
The only one who brings up Conspiracy are Paul Haters. The FACT that when he does get media attention (besides the Business channels who have been treating him fairly since the last election) they aim to marginalize or ridicule him (like many of the MSM’s regurgitators here). That he doesn’t receive the same kind of coverage has nothing to do with his polling #s and everything to do with the fact that he opposes both major elements of BIG Government: The Welfare State and the Warfare State. It’s unfortunate that there are so many devotees to the latter on this thread.
Maybe there is a Paul hater at this site, but I don’t know of any. Most of us like Paul personally.
Even though the media people in the video say they are part of a “Conspriacy” I am imagining there is a conspriacy?
Here is my post again if you want to actually comment on the substance of it instead of engaging in sacastic insults:
That’s not the point.
Did LaRouche’s positions start anything as politically relevant as the Tea Party?
Did Pauls?
Ummm, yes. Ron Paul is ground zero for the Tea Party.