Catholics...For Your Advise.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mosacked
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No offense I hope, just trying to make Catholics ‘see’ how some of us think.
Reminds me of, to paraphrase, something Albert Einsteinn said about their being only two infinites, the universe and human stupidity, but he was not totally sure of the first. It really seems like Fundamentalist thought (an oxymoron) seems to be getting even worse as time goes by.

Have you actually read Catholic theology–and, no, the junk that comes out of the mouths of a bunch of hick Fundamentalist wackos doesn’t count. If you actually read Catholic theology, you wouldn’t ask these questions because you’d realize they are just stupid.

And, finally, don’t insult Mother Mary. I don’t care what ‘comparisons’ you are trying to make, DON’T INSULT MOTHER MARY! Unless you want me making nasty ‘comparisons’ about your mother, don’t insult Mother Mary.
 
Sorry if I sound angry, but it does really anger me when people insult Our Mother. I mean, she loves us as her children, watches out for us and wants us to join her in Heaven, she does everything she can to help us get into Heaven (she gave us the Rosary, the Scapular, etc.) and she is the perfect mother, most sweet, loving, and wonderful.

And what do Fundamentalists do? They insult her and treat her with disrespect!
 
His posts are as offensive to Protestants as to Catholics. The Virgin Mary is the Mother of Jesus–the Son of God, the Word Incarnate, who came in the flesh as fully God and fully man. I really can’t imagine how any Christian would claim that Mary is not the Mother of Jesus.

Anna
Your mind is stuck, Anna, re-read what you wrote and re-read what I wrote.

I NEVER said Mary is not the mother of Jesus. And I certainly NEVER said Jesus is not God.

Jesus was human and also DIVINE. The Divine part - which really is what determines divinity did NOT come from Mary. Its as simple as that. Mary was a surrogate mother if that is the term to use.

Call Mary, the mother of Jesus is not wrong…but calling her the mother of God is blasphemy.

And in the very words of Mary herself…**.Luke1:38 - “I am the Lord’s slave”
**

It is a great mishandling of scripture when the characters themselves declare themselves as slaves, yet the readers exalt them to even divinity.

.

.
 
Your mind is stuck, Anna, re-read what you wrote and re-read what I wrote.

I NEVER said Mary is not the mother of Jesus. And I certainly NEVER said Jesus is not God.

Jesus was human and also DIVINE. The Divine part - which really is what determines divinity did NOT come from Mary. Its as simple as that. Mary was a surrogate mother if that is the term to use.

Call Mary, the mother of Jesus is not wrong…but calling her the mother of God is blasphemy.

And in the very words of Mary herself…**.Luke1:38 - “I am the Lord’s slave”
**

It is a great mishandling of scripture when the characters themselves declare themselves as slaves, yet the readers exalt them to even divinity.
Are you claiming Jesus’ humanity are Divinity are separable?

Who cares what you think is blasphemous? You have shown yourself to be just another in a long line of Fundamentalist shmucks who have little knowledge of Catholic doctrine other than the squeeze that is spread by other Fundamentalist shmucks.

I find I have little patients for Fundamentalists. They are foolish and take a semi-educated and literalistic approach to Scripture interpretation; their shortcomings are acknowledged by many other Protestants who have little patience for Fundamentalist drivel as well.

EDIT: AND FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME, CATHOLIC DOCTRINE DOES NOT CLAIM MOTHER MARY IS DIVINE! ARE YOU STUPID OR JUST INFECTED BY THE CANCER OF FUNDAMENTALIST JUNK THEOLOGY?!

EDIT 2: Here is a good article defending the Marian title of ‘Mother of God’: Mother of God
 
EDIT: AND FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME, CATHOLIC DOCTRINE DOES NOT CLAIM MOTHER MARY IS DIVINE! ARE YOU STUPID OR JUST INFECTED BY THE CANCER OF FUNDAMENTALIST JUNK THEOLOGY?!
Not disagreeing (at all!), just wondering whether or not this kind of tone is allowed by the admins?
If a non-RC used this kind of language against an RC, the post would be deleted, and he/she would get an infraction…no, probably suspended.
 
Mosacked,
I think I am starting to see what you are saying.

Is this correct, in you mind.

Jesus is God.

Jesus is man.

All human flesh is sinful.

Jesus had no sin.

Jesus’s flesh could not have been normal human flesh

Since Jesus could not have normal human flesh, which is sinful, his flesh must have been specially created by God at the time of the Incarnation.

Am I hitting it as you see it?
 
Not disagreeing (at all!), just wondering whether or not this kind of tone is allowed by the admins?
If a non-RC used this kind of language against an RC, the post would be deleted, and he/she would get an infraction…no, probably suspended.
I get sick and tired of people who come into a Catholic website and continually misrepresent Catholic doctrine even though they have been told the correct doctrine. I mean, how would you feel if I went to a Lutheran forum and started attacking a misrepresentation of Lutheran doctrine even after I had been corrected multiple times on it.
 
I get sick and tired of people who come into a Catholic website and continually misrepresent Catholic doctrine even though they have been told the correct doctrine. I mean, how would you feel if I went to a Lutheran forum and started attacking a misrepresentation of Lutheran doctrine even after I had been corrected multiple times on it.
Did you notice that I said I didn’t disagree with your assessment?

(furthermore, I HAVE been in the situation you describe countless times - only it was HERE.)

What I’m questioning is whether or not that tone is kosher for all to use - and not just for RCs against non-RCs.
 
Did you notice that I said I didn’t disagree with your assessment?

(furthermore, I HAVE been in the situation you describe countless times - only it was HERE.)

What I’m questioning is whether or not that tone is kosher for all to use - and not just for RCs against non-RCs.
No, DK. I’m surprised that mosacked hasn’t been tossed. He is quite dense. I wonder if he has concrete in that place between his ears? Paraphrasing Bugs Bunny “what a Moroon!”.

I also apologize for your being attacked by Catholics in this forum. It is truly un-Christian ( mosacked and his ilk are exceptions ). But consider that we are also attacked the same way when we participate in Protestant forums, but that really is no excuse. God Bless.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
Your mind is stuck, Anna, re-read what you wrote and re-read what I wrote.

I NEVER said Mary is not the mother of Jesus. And I certainly NEVER said Jesus is not God.

Jesus was human and also DIVINE. The Divine part - which really is what determines divinity did NOT come from Mary. Its as simple as that. Mary was a surrogate mother if that is the term to use.

Call Mary, the mother of Jesus is not wrong…but calling her the mother of God is blasphemy.

And in the very words of Mary herself…**.Luke1:38 - “I am the Lord’s slave”
**

It is a great mishandling of scripture when the characters themselves declare themselves as slaves, yet the readers exalt them to even divinity.

.

.
Calling Mary the mother of Jesus is not wrong,but calling Her the Mother of God is,I hate to tell you this But Jesus is God,Read Your bible and God bless you,You need all the help you can get,wow I will say I have never read a post as BAB as this one
 
His posts are as offensive to Protestants as to Catholics. The Virgin Mary is the Mother of Jesus–the Son of God, the Word Incarnate, who came in the flesh as fully God and fully man. I really can’t imagine how any Christian would claim that Mary is not the Mother of Jesus.

Anna
Your mind is stuck, Anna, re-read what you wrote and re-read what I wrote.

I NEVER said Mary is not the mother of Jesus. And I certainly NEVER said Jesus is not God.

Jesus was human and also DIVINE. The Divine part - which really is what determines divinity did NOT come from Mary. Its as simple as that. Mary was a surrogate mother if that is the term to use.

Call Mary, the mother of Jesus is not wrong…but calling her the mother of God is blasphemy.

And in the very words of Mary herself…**.Luke1:38 - “I am the Lord’s slave”
**

It is a great mishandling of scripture when the characters themselves declare themselves as slaves, yet the readers exalt them to even divinity.
Who has said that the “Divine part” of Jesus came from Mary? Jesus was conceived through the Holy Spirit. No one on this Thread is claiming otherwise.

Who has deified Mary? Catholics have clearly stated they do not deify or worship Mary.
And I realise that the problem actually is that Catholics believe that Jesus came from Mary and is not ‘surrogate’.

Well, yes Jesus is 100% human…but then?..are you assuming that the 100% part of Jesus came FROM Mary? Okay, you might retort and say, “why do you then assume that the 100% did NOT come from Mary?”

What I do learn from Scripture is that no flesh shall inherit the kingdom, by that it must mean (since Jesus has ASCENDED into heaven), that the flesh of Jesus is not the flesh that we all know of (since Jesus Himself said “this is the manna that came down from heaven”). Now, the Bible says very clearly that Jesus came FROM Heaven, the conception was by the Holy Spirit, and Jesus Himself declared that He was manna FROM Heaven.

NOW…how does Mary come into play as being the ‘producer’ of that which came from heaven??? NOTHING!..In which case, she was indeed just a ‘surrogate’.
No one is claiming that Mary was the “producer” of that which came from heaven.

Your claim that Mary was a “surrogate,” denies both the Prophecies of the OT, and the very words of the NT. There is no Scripture that claims Mary was a surrogate–so you are re-writing the N.T. for your own purposes. You are altering Holy Scripture–very dangerous.

The O.T. contains many prophecies regarding the coming of Christ–notice He would come as a descendant of David, according to the flesh, a son of David’s body. Jesus as “fully man” was a descendant through the line of David, as foretold by prophecy.

**2 Samuel 7: **12 When your days are fulfilled and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. 13 He shall build a house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.

Psalm 132: 11 The LORD swore to David a sure oath from which he will not turn back: “One of the sons of your body I will set on your throne. . .”

Jesus was descended from David “according to the flesh.”

Romans 1:
1 Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, 2 which he promised beforehand through his prophets in the holy Scriptures, 3 concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh 4 and was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord, 5 through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith for the sake of his name among all the nations, 6including you who are called to belong to Jesus Christ,

Jesus came as God incarnate, the Word became flesh.

John 1 (ESV): 14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. 15 ( John bore witness about him, and cried out, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me ranks before me, because he was before me.’”) 16 And from his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace. 17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

Jesus was “born of a woman, born under the law.”

Galatians 4: 4 But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law,

To deny that Mary is the Mother of Jesus, is to deny that Jesus came in the flesh, as a descendant of David.

Your denial has serious ramifications, extending to the crucifixion of Christ and His atonement of our sins through the sacrifice of His body and blood.

You malign the Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus, the mother of God Incarnate.
 
=LutheranDK;6020318]According to yourselves…
See the circular reasoning?
Don’t derail this thread by starting this debate…
No I don’t :o

Try this logic friend…

The Bible is the 'Inspired Word of God," because you seem unfilmilar with what the Bible actually say’s here it is for you. Please notice the word’s “all,” “inspired” and “by GOD.”

2Tim.3: [16] “All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,”

FACTS:

God cannot lie!

The Bible is the Inspired WORDS of God

The Bible was 100% written by the end of the First Century

At this point in time there existed ONLY One Church [that which is known world wide today as thee Catholic Church.] Now some 2000 years young!

And ONLY the Catholic Bible.

Thus the Bible has to and had to be from and through the CC and intended for Catholic Instruction and ONLY they have the God given power and authority to interpet it. [LOGIG didcates you can’t share what YOU don’t have!] ONLY the CC had the Bible for 1500 years as a exclusive from God Himself. Look up John 17:17

That friend is not circular logic, it’s FACT supported by history and logic:shrug:
 
Mosacked,
I think I am starting to see what you are saying.

Is this correct, in you mind.

Jesus is God.

Jesus is man.

All human flesh is sinful.

Jesus had no sin.

Jesus’s flesh could not have been normal human flesh

Since Jesus could not have normal human flesh, which is sinful, his flesh must have been specially created by God at the time of the Incarnation.

Am I hitting it as you see it?
If so, then this is the first heresy - the heresy of Gnosticism - the idea that the “flesh” of St. Paul was all that is physical - the human body.

On the contrary - the human body is very holy, being made in the image and likeness of God. It is only when we begin to do “the things of the flesh” - that is, when we follow our base instincts and overindulge in food, sex, and other pleasures, that we mar the holy image of God in our bodies - or when we do things that harm other people, or make them into objects of lust or anger - this is when we sin.

But the physical world is not evil, and the human body is not evil - all of it was created by God, and God said that it was very good. (See Genesis 1.)
 
If so, then this is the first heresy - the heresy of Gnosticism - the idea that the “flesh” of St. Paul was all that is physical - the human body.

On the contrary - the human body is very holy, being made in the image and likeness of God. It is only when we begin to do “the things of the flesh” - that is, when we follow our base instincts and overindulge in food, sex, and other pleasures, that we mar the holy image of God in our bodies - or when we do things that harm other people, or make them into objects of lust or anger - this is when we sin.

But the physical world is not evil, and the human body is not evil - all of it was created by God, and God said that it was very good. (See Genesis 1.)
Actually, I was trying to decide if it was Gnosticism with a little Nestorianism or the other way around.
 
And you choose to ignore what the Bible says over what you wish to interpret.{?QUOTE]
Actually that’s the protestant approach. The Lord says, “This is my body.” You ignore what He says over what you wish to interpret. The Lord says, “If you do not eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you.” You ignore what He says over what you wish to interpret. Case closed on that one.
Mosacked;6014373:
The Bible said Jesus was the SON of God. The Bible never said Jesus was the Father.
The Bible merely said Jesus was IN the Father and the Father was in Him.{?QUOTE]
You are ignorant of Trinitarian theology. Go and study this bible you think you know and come back in 20 years.
GOD IS A SPIRIT. IF THE SPIRIT OF GOD RESTS UPON ME AND INSPIRES ME TO TELL YOU ‘FERDE, WHEN YOU SPEAK TO ME, YOU SPEAKETH TO GOD’, DOES THAT MEAN I AM GOD??? NO!
Believe me, I have no problem with that.
The problem with Catholics is they deitify that which should be humbled (eg. Mary) and they humble that which should be exalted (Jesus).
That wan, crippled bit of bigotry is so worn it’s become a joke.

The problem with protestants is they can’t think.
 
And it’s impossible to suggest that Mary was only the mother of Jesus’ human part and not his divine part. There are no parts. As others have said repeatedly, Jesus is 100% human AND 100% divine. If Mary is his mother, she is really his mother, and if Jesus is God, Mary is the Mother of God. Period.
What we’re arguing against here is the Nestorian heresy, which was disposed of at least 1500 years ago in Constantinople. The person we’re arguing against is just another unlettered, garden variety protestant who can’t display his ignorance enough to satisfy his bloated ego.
 
No I don’t :o

Try this logic friend…

The Bible is the 'Inspired Word of God," because you seem unfilmilar with what the Bible actually say’s here it is for you. Please notice the word’s “all,” “inspired” and “by GOD.”

2Tim.3: [16] “All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,”
Oh, the arrogance…
I think I know the Bible better than you do, friend. And I can read it in the original languages.
FACTS:

God cannot lie!
Agree
The Bible is the Inspired WORDS of God
Unsure as to why you would stress WORDS, but yes - agreed.
The Bible was 100% written by the end of the First Century
Agreed, although I’m open to the possibility that Revelation was written shortly after the turn of the century.
At this point in time there existed ONLY One Church [that which is known world wide today as thee Catholic Church.] Now some 2000 years young!
Disagree - and this is where your logic fails. If this premise held, then so would your conclusion. Unfortunately, it does not.
And ONLY the Catholic Bible.
Anachronism…
Thus the Bible has to and had to be from and through the CC and intended for Catholic Instruction and ONLY they have the God given power and authority to interpet it.
See above.
[LOGIG didcates you can’t share what YOU don’t have!] ONLY the CC had the Bible for 1500 years as a exclusive from God Himself. Look up John 17:17
See above.
And:
“Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.” - what did you mean to say here?
That friend is not circular logic, it’s FACT supported by history and logic:shrug:
“The RC is the church which Jesus founded, and it is, because the RC church says so.”
If that’s not circular reasoning - then the concept does not exist.

However - I suggest we end this debate here, so as to not derail this thread even further than it already has been.
 
Actually, I was trying to decide if it was Gnosticism with a little Nestorianism or the other way around.
Oh, there is definitely a spicy hint of Nestorianism in this stew, as well - in fact I think Nestorius himself would be embarrassed by the amount of rudeness expressed towards Our Lady.
 
Oh, there is definitely a spicy hint of Nestorianism in this stew, as well - in fact I think Nestorius himself would be embarrassed by the amount of rudeness expressed towards Our Lady.
Actually, I am not sure that he intended any insults to her. It seems like he holds to a view that does not allow for him to see the beauty in Mary as Mother of God.

Many people hold to heretical thoughts. Only a lucky few may be actual heretics
 
Originally posted by LutheranDK
Oh, the arrogance…
I think I know the Bible better than you do, friend. And I can read it in the original languages.
Speaking of arrogance, that is some arrogant statement. Can you read Aramaic and Koine Greek? These are the original languages used to record the Bible. I can read Hebrew, but find it extremely difficult to read Aramaic.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top