J
Javl
Guest
Javl;6041824:
Mosacked, with all due respect, that is a very poor example to use. To me it is tantamount to blasphemy. Your understanding of the Virgin Birth of Jesus and for Mary, Jesus’ mother, to be the Mother of God is irrational and makes no sense whatsoever. When the Gospels were written, those that wrote them knew exactly what they were writing. They stated that Jesus is divine and that Mary is His Mother, and as such she is the Mother of God, the Son. I don’t remember offhand the word used in Aramaic, but it translates Theotokos—“God Bearer”. Luke wrote his Gospel in Koine Greek and he used that word to describe Mary. According to you, all the translators and scholars who have used the term God Bearer, or Mother of God. are wrong and do not know what they are talking about. I say this to you in all charity, please give up your ideas and learn the Truth.Javl, with all due respect… I already gave you the example of the surrogate monkey with the human foetus.
Now, if the human physician could speak monkey language and tells the female monkey ’ therefore also that being which shall be born of thee shall be called the son of human.’ would the human speaker then be in error? No.
But is the monkey therefore the mother of the human? And hence all monkeys call her the Mother Of Human???
What do you think???
I will pray for you.
PAX DOMINI
Shalom Aleichem
