Catholics VS Health Care in America: Morally Embarrassing

  • Thread starter Thread starter MindOverMatter2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your agenda in trying to make people believe that voting has no influence in the abortion laws is suspect at the least.

Do you deny that the democratic platform states openly that they are for abortion on demand?

Do you deny that the republican platform states that they are against abortion.

How do you explain the naral ratings of the democrats vs republicans?
It is wrong to deprive needy people of free health care on the ground that the government will pass another law which is contrary to one’s beliefs and values. In a democracy one shouldn’t attempt to impose one’s beliefs and values on others but respect their God-given rights to choose what to believe and how to live provided that they do not contravene the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If they are determined to have an abortion nothing will stop them even it means going abroad or to a back street practitioner. In the meantime men, women and children are suffering and dying due to lack of proper medical treatment.
 
It is wrong to deprive needy people of free health care on the ground that the government will pass another law which is contrary to one’s beliefs and values. In a democracy one shouldn’t attempt to impose one’s beliefs and values on others but respect their God-given rights to choose what to believe and how to live provided that they do not contravene the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If they are determined to have an abortion nothing will stop them even it means going abroad or to a back street practitioner. In the meantime men, women and children are suffering and dying due to lack of proper medical treatment.
Look at your law. Look at how you have accepted this mass killing.

I cannot believe that Catholics are suggesting that we give up the fighting on all fronts on abortion.
 
It is wrong to deprive needy people of free health care on the ground that the government will pass another law which is contrary to one’s beliefs and values. In a democracy one shouldn’t attempt to impose one’s beliefs and values on others but respect their God-given rights to choose what to believe and how to live provided that they do not contravene the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If they are determined to have an abortion nothing will stop them even it means going abroad or to a back street practitioner. In the meantime men, women and children are suffering and dying due to lack of proper medical treatment.
Perfectly accurate, cogently, and brilliantly stated. Thanks for voicing sanity on this issue. 👍
 
Perfectly accurate, cogently, and brilliantly stated. Thanks for voicing sanity on this issue. 👍
Do you think the millions of the most innocent whose lives were ended would agree with you?
 
It is wrong to deprive needy people of free health care on the ground that the government will pass another law which is contrary to one’s beliefs and values. In a democracy one shouldn’t attempt to impose one’s beliefs and values on others but respect their God-given rights to choose what to believe and how to live provided that they do not contravene the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If they are determined to have an abortion nothing will stop them even it means going abroad or to a back street practitioner. In the meantime men, women and children are suffering and dying due to lack of proper medical treatment.
Thank you for that encouragement! In the UK the Conservatives who represent big business are privatising the National Health Service because there are immense profits to be made in providing medical treatment. That is the real motive in the States for opposing any change in the system: big money is at the root of it…
 
Do you think the millions of the most innocent whose lives were ended would agree with you?
They will be ended regardless of whatever health system is in place. You can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her. I’m appalled just as much as you are by abortions but we have to be realistic in a secular society. It’s a waste of time pining for the past and living in a dream world…
 
They will be ended regardless of whatever health system is in place. You can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her. I’m appalled just as much as you are by abortions but we have to be realistic in a secular society. It’s a waste of time pining for the past and living in a dream world…
Oh I see your reasoning, can’t beat them join them?
 
Refute the claim about big business? Come on.
  1. Do you deny that many abortions will be performed regardless of whatever health system is in place?
  2. Do you deny that you can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her?
  3. Do you deny that there are immense profits made out of medical treatment?
  4. Do you deny that one shouldn’t attempt to impose one’s beliefs and values on others but respect their God-given rights to choose what to believe and how to live?
If so why?
 
  1. Do you deny that many abortions will be performed regardless of whatever health system is in place?
This is really a silly question. You appear to be justifying your stance by saying many abortions instead of “as” many abortions. I think you know the answer that more people would do something if their were no cost rather than if they had to pay for it.
  1. Do you deny that you can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her?
Of course not, but read my answer to your first silly question, applies here as well.
  1. Do you deny that there are immense profits made out of medical treatment?
What do you think are immense profits? Do you know what their profits are? Do you realize that profits also help the retirement of many who have investments in profitable businesses? Is making a profit and sharing that profit with others wrong?
  1. Do you deny that one shouldn’t attempt to impose one’s beliefs and values on others but respect their God-given rights to choose what to believe and how to live?
    If so why?
Substitute slavery for abortion. If something is wrong it is wrong and should be fought and not joining the “wrong” side and helping to make it seem right.

I have a question for you…Do you realize that your church says that it is killing a human being? You say you are against it, yet you are an apologist for those that openly promote i.
 
That is a silly answer! (I reply in kind.)You appear to be justifying your stance by counting the number of abortions as a justification for depriving an entire nation of free health care for millions who are the victims of an unjust capitalist system. (And don’t think I’m biased against the US because the UK has been dominated by inherited power and wealth for a thousand years - even though it is now under under the cloak of democracy which has done little to change the basic social structure of society.
:
2. Do you deny that you can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her?
Of course not, but read my answer to your first silly question, applies here as well.

Read my answer to the first question without repeating your silly answer.
Do you deny that you can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her?
3. Do you deny that there are immense profits made out of medical treatment?
Code:
 Quote:
                                             What do you think are immense profits?  Do you know what their  profits are?  Do you realize that profits also help the retirement of  many who have investments in profitable businesses?  Is making a profit  and sharing that profit with others wrong?

It is very wrong when it results in millions of people living in desperate poverty in the richest nation in the world.
4. Do you deny that one shouldn’t attempt to impose one’s beliefs and values on others but respect their God-given rights to choose what to believe and how to live?
If so why?
Substitute slavery for abortion. If something is wrong it is wrong and should be fought and not joining the “wrong” side and helping to make it seem right.

Non sequitur. Have you ever heard of the principle of the lesser evil?

I
have a question for you…Do you realize that your church says that it is killing a human being? You say you are against it, yet you are an apologist for those that openly promote it.
False! You are an apologist for letting human beings die unnecessarily because of human greed and selfishness under the cloak of “the right to make a profit”- which is often vicious and excessive at other people’s expense…
 
Thank you for that encouragement! In the UK the Conservatives who represent big business are privatising the National Health Service because there are immense profits to be made in providing medical treatment. That is the real motive in the States for opposing any change in the system: big money is at the root of it…
You speak rightly. and we pay twice as much as the next most expensive country for the privilege of going bankrupt through medical expenses where they can at least remain sovent. And so on. I’ve posted it alll before.
 
In the meantime men, women and children are suffering and dying due to lack of proper medical treatment.
Do you have an estimate for the number of these men, women and children?

With Medicare, Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, the VA, the Department of Defense, and individual State health care programs, the US is spending **trillions **of dollars on health care for those who can’t afford it. This is a huge health care safety net.

Moreover, 85% of Americans are satisfied with their health care. Do you have a comparable statistic for the UK?

With respect to proper medical treatment, I wonder how long you have to wait for an MRI in the UK?

What’s the coverage for orphan drugs in the UK? for the most effective chemotherapy drugs? for dialysis? for bone marrow transplants? for organ transplants (e.g., kidney, liver, lung)? for joint replacements (e.g., hip, knee)? And how long do you have to wait for these treatments and procedures?

What are the survival rates for ESRD patients in the UK? for cancer patients? for heart attack victims?
 
I meant to add that the US has the best hospitals in the world. And the poor have incredible access to these hospitals due to the very generous safety net mentioned in the above posting (#841).
 
That is a silly answer! (I reply in kind.)You appear to be justifying your stance by counting the number of abortions as a justification for depriving an entire nation of free health care for millions who are the victims of an unjust capitalist system. (And don’t think I’m biased against the US because the UK has been dominated by inherited power and wealth for a thousand years - even though it is now under under the cloak of democracy which has done little to change the basic social structure of society.
:
Read my answer to the first question without repeating your silly answer.
Do you deny that you can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her?

It is very wrong when it results in millions of people living in desperate poverty in the richest nation in the world.

Non sequitur. Have you ever heard of the principle of the lesser evil?

IFalse! You are an apologist for letting human beings die unnecessarily because of human greed and selfishness under the cloak of “the right to make a profit”- which is often vicious and excessive at other people’s expense…
The problem with your arguments are that you are speaking from another country and do not have the first hand experience to see that almost all of what you are saying has very little truth to it.
 
Dang, those are some special ‘rose colored’ glasses you are wearing
Thank you for that encouragement! In the UK the Conservatives who represent big business are privatising the National Health Service because there are immense profits to be made in providing medical treatment. That is the real motive in the States for opposing any change in the system: big money is at the root of it…
Wherever there is money, there is big business. So they are involved whether the doctor is private or public. And Govt is the biggest business of all.
They will be ended regardless of whatever health system is in place. You can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her. I’m appalled just as much as you are by abortions but we have to be realistic in a secular society. It’s a waste of time pining for the past and living in a dream world…
No, I can’t force women to have a baby, or a meth head to stop his habit, etc. etc. Are arguing that when things are common, they are no longer a sin?
  1. Do you deny that many abortions will be performed regardless of whatever health system is in place?
  2. Do you deny that you can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her?
  3. Do you deny that there are immense profits made out of medical treatment?
  4. Do you deny that one shouldn’t attempt to impose one’s beliefs and values on others but respect their God-given rights to choose what to believe and how to live?
If so why?
No,
No,
No - commerce has always been a part of medical care. competition is proven to limit wast and profits.
Yes, have you no clue on how laws, (which impose restrictions and thus values on others), are created? It seems you are fin with whatevcer the majority chooses.
 
What’s morally embarrassing is that there are Christians who embrace the philosophy of a drunk, fanatical anti-Christian, family-neglecting, adulating, Atheistic German bum. :sad_yes:
 
*That is a silly answer! (I reply in kind.)You appear to be justifying your stance by counting the number of abortions as a justification for depriving an entire nation of free health care for millions who are the victims of an unjust capitalist system. (And don’t think I’m biased against the US because the UK has been dominated by inherited power and wealth for a thousand years - even though it is now under under the cloak of democracy which has done little to change the basic social structure of society.
:
Read my answer to the first question without repeating your silly answer.
Do you deny that you can’t force women to have a baby if they’ve made up their mind to get rid of him or her?
  1. You have signally failed to refute my statements and evaded them with the feeble assertion that I am “speaking from another country” as if that means I know nothing whatsoever about the US!
  2. Both US citizens and European citizens have given me detailed eye-witness reports of the hardships of those who - unlike you - are deprived through no fault of their own of medical treatment given to their pets by wealthier people.
  3. Thank you for exposing your inability to defend the grossly unjust and inhuman lack of a basic human necessity which is provided in much poorer nations - and fast disappearing in the UK as the result of a government consisting of millionaires which is ensuring that the rich are getting richer and the poor are steadily getting poorer.
  4. Despite the fact that Iain Duncan Smith, the work and pensions secretary, claims to be a Catholic he is taking the first steps to downgrade the former Labour government’s commitment to eradicating child poverty in 2020…
guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jun/14/child-poverty-iain-duncan-smith
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top