C
CopticChristian
Guest
continued…I think you will find that there are a couple of people here that find contempt in the program, not because they have any first hand experience, but because the program did not originate in Rome.
- Accountability with a group leader, “the variable format”
Each week the format varies with this accountability with a group leader. The weeks break down as follows:
- One evening devoted to prayer and singing exclusively.
- One to an experience meeting with voluntary or solicited with an occasional word of encouragement, reproof, or advice as may seem best adapted, interspersed with appropriate songs.
- Two evenings to Scripture recitations, bearing on some subject previously announced.
- Accountability with a group leader, “the conversational plan”
The group leader opens the meeting and announces the topic of conversation. Then the group leader gives his or her own experience concerning it, and the asks volunteers to do the same, all the while making all they say come out in the form of natural conversation. There was no discussing anything but experience. - Accountability with a group leader, “free talk”
This method arose from disliking the old method of a brief testimony from each person and a reply from the leader (intended to avoid rambling and unprofitable conversation). Instead, crosstalk was encouraged. The leader gives out a scripture promise at the close of a meeting for the succeeding one. There was something of a system of texts, beginning with the Christian life, and then expressing different stages of advancement. - Accountability with a group leader (Probationers Class)
Some societies had a 3 month probationary period. These societies allowed first two visits to a Methodist class society to check it out, one every other week, to protect the sensitivities of the current members. Evidently the probationary period was sometimes served as a part of a Class Society meeting and sometimes the probationary period was served as a separate meeting from the class. These were ministered to as those with convincing or convicting grace. The Method for this class is unknown, but it probably followed closely one of the 3 “older methods” of the class society. It is being listed as a separate method because the class was offered to those who were on a probationary status, and after satisfactory completion they would move onto a regular Class Society. - Group Accountability (Band Society)
Where the Class Society was focused to be an entry point to Methodism, the Band Society was for those who experienced justifying grace, sought sanctification and wanted to maximize James 5:16: “Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed.
12) Group Accountability (Select Society)
No specific method of holiness. No group leader. Members “selected” by John Wesley or another official with senior ranking in the Methodist Societies. Usually a group of 4-6, they observed the “General Rules” and the “Directions Given to the Select Society” and practiced accountability for sanctification and for their gifts of the spirit.
- Accountability with a Group Leader (Penitent Society)
This group was comprised of persons who were backsliders from either the class or the band societies. The accountability method is unknown. Meetings were usually conducted on Saturday evening to separate them from the Class and Band Society meetings usually held on Thursday evening. John Wesley presided over many of these meetings with the “no one left behind” approach for those who wanted to repent and come back. They practiced accountability for their convicting grace

