CHALLENGING mary's assumption

  • Thread starter Thread starter stompalot
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
OK so we know that Mary assumed body and soul from her tomb implying that that she died, and all of this information was passed down through apostolic tradition right?

So exactly where is her tomb that she assumed from located then? (This information should of been though apostolic tradition)
 
OK you’re saying that she died. I’m confused because the early church father Epiphanus, in 377 AD stated:
  • If the Holy Virgin had died and was buried, her falling asleep would have been surrounded with honour, death would have found her pure, and her crown would have been a virginal one…Had she been martyred according to what is written: ‘Thine own soul a sword shall pierce’, then she would shine gloriously among the martyrs, and her holy body would have been declared blessed; for by her, did light come to the world.” Epiphanius,Panarion,78:23(A.D. 377),in PG 42:737
Did she die? We do not know. At all events, if she was buried, she had no carnal intercourse. . . . Or she remained alive, since nothing is impossible with God and he can do whatever he desires” (Panarion, haer. 78, nn. 10-11,23: G.C.S., 37, 461-462; 474).*

Also, you say that after Mary died in her tomb, she assumed into Heaven, and all this information was passed down apostolically.

So where is the exact location of her tomb where she assumed from located? This should be an extraordinary place of veneration for Catholics. (They knew where Peter died and so they built St. Peter’s Basilica over it. I would imagine they would do the same for someone deserving higher veneration)
 
We don’t know if she did or did not die.
Then why does “GOOD FELLA” in this forum keep saying that she DID DIE!! and that it is the truth??? You Catholics are confusing…some of you say she did died and you on the other hand she she didn’t die
We don’t have her bones.
WE DON’T HAVE JOSEPH’S BONES EITHER!!! SO DID HE ASSUME TOO?
 
Then why does “GOOD FELLA” in this forum keep saying that she DID DIE!! and that it is the truth??? You Catholics are confusing…some of you say she did died and you on the other hand she she didn’t die
Her death or lack of it is not a matter of doctrine. We can believe either.
WE DON’T HAVE JOSEPH’S BONES EITHER!!!
I have no idea about Joseph.
SO DID HE ASSUME TOO?
The phrasing of your question suggests that one assumes himself or herself. Not so. God assumes.
 
Her death or lack of it is not a matter of doctrine. We can believe either.
Sorry for asking a lot of questions and thanks for baring with me but still things don’t make any sense.

The reason why Catholics are free to chose to believe if Mary died or not is because the Pope didn’t declare it infallible right?

OK, so my question is why didn’t he? Is it because he doesn’t know if she died or not? If he knew she did in fact die, then what is the exact location? This should of been passed down through apostolic tradition and this place would a place of high reverence right?

Some Catholics also say that her death is not important and the main point is that she assumed.
Actually that’s an ironic answer. Catholics revere saints that die like Mother Teresa and have celebrations for deceased popes and beatification for saints- so death is important and celebrated in the Catholic Church. I think its unusual to say that Mary’s death is not important because I would imagine that it would be one of the most celebrated feast in Catholic tradition. If she did die and is being celebrated (Dormition) which “GOODFELLA” is proclaiming in this forum, then why do you say you can choose to believe if she died or not?? Doesn’t make any sense.

If she didn’t die then where does it say in Catholic Tradition that “someone saw her assume into Heaven without death”???

Where is it??

I find it strangely odd how Catholics keep a meticulous detailed track record and know about all the apostle’s death, every single pope, bishop, and saint, on where and how they died but NOTHING about if Mary, the Queen of Heaven, died or not or where she died??

Seriously, how does one NOT know if the QUEEN of Heaven, Mother of God died or not?
 
Hercules, If you laid someone in a tomb and afterward they were taken bodily to heaven, would you announce whether or not they experienced the parting of body and soul?
 
The reason why Catholics are free to chose to believe if Mary died or not is because the Pope didn’t declare it infallible right?
Just about.
OK, so my question is why didn’t he? Is it because he doesn’t know if she died or not? If he knew she did in fact die, then what is the exact location? This should of been passed down through apostolic tradition and this place would a place of high reverence right?
No. Apostolic Tradition is not an infallible encyclopedia of everything that ever happened in the History of Christianity. The most crucial teachings and interpretations are passed down through the Church - the Eucharist, the Trinity, the means of salvation, etc. Apostolic Tradition does not tell us infallibly where all the Apostles preached and died, where Jesus fed the 5,000 or even which books are in the New Testament (That was decided 300 years later by the Pope and Church Councils).

There are local, “small t” traditions of where the apostles died, and where Mary’s assumption took place, but these are not infallible, “big T” Traditions.
Some Catholics also say that her death is not important and the main point is that she assumed.
Actually that’s an ironic answer. Catholics revere saints that die like Mother Teresa and have celebrations for deceased popes and beatification for saints- so death is important and celebrated in the Catholic Church. I think its unusual to say that Mary’s death is not important because I would imagine that it would be one of the most celebrated feast in Catholic tradition. If she did die and is being celebrated (Dormition) which “GOODFELLA” is proclaiming in this forum, then why do you say you can choose to believe if she died or not?? Doesn’t make any sense.
Your alleged difficulty doesn’t make any sense to me. The bodily assumption was what mattered to the early Church, not the physiological state of Mary’s body throughout the process. In fact if the Assumption were an invented doctrine, it would be easier for the inventor to come down on one side or the other.

Using the Orthodox definition of “dormition” is confusing the issue, since dormition merely means “falling asleep”, showing that in its early usage, even by the Orthodox, it did not carry a surety of the death of Mary.
If she didn’t die then where does it say in Catholic Tradition that “someone saw her assume into Heaven without death”???

Where is it??
It is in the teaching of the Church down the ages - just like the Trinity. If you’re looking for another bible with infallible content - you clearly misunderstand verbal Tradition.
I find it strangely odd how Catholics keep a meticulous detailed track record and know about all the apostle’s death, every single pope, bishop, and saint, on where and how they died but NOTHING about if Mary, the Queen of Heaven, died or not or where she died??

Seriously, how does one NOT know if the QUEEN of Heaven, Mother of God died or not?
Actually Catholics DON’T have infallible teachings about every Apostle’s death and mission. Only a few are recorded securely. There are local traditions that St Mark went to Alexandria, St James to Spain, St Thomas to India, but these are not infallible teachings. With Saints, ordinary hiistorical records have survived of some, but not of others. The problem with historical records from the First century is 1) Virtually nothing original survives from that period in the form of documentation. 2) During the years of persecution from 60 AD to 312 AD, Christian documentation was systematically searched out and destroyed by the Imperial authorities. You are therefore not going to have complete written records of theological minitiae or the locations of Saint’s tombs. The important matter was that Mary was assumed. Whether her soul left the body for a period during the process is not something that affects this either way. I think you’re choking on gnats.

You could just as well ask “How do we NOT KNOW what Jesus did between the ages of 12 and 30?”
 
The reason why Catholics are free to chose to believe if Mary died or not is because the Pope didn’t declare it infallible right?
The pope hasn’t “declared it infallible” because (lower case “t”) tradition has not been clear. Infallible papal declarations happen rarely and often come about because traditional Church teaching has been challenged. whether she died or not is not a non-negotiable teaching.
OK, so my question is why didn’t he? Is it because he doesn’t know if she died or not?
correct
If he knew she did in fact die, then what is the exact location? This should of been passed down through apostolic tradition and this place would a place of high reverence right?
Yes. It makes sense. My bet is that there is an Orthodox or Catholic Church there.
Some Catholics also say that her death is not important and the main point is that she assumed.
Some think it is very important.
Actually that’s an ironic answer. Catholics revere saints that die like Mother Teresa and have celebrations for deceased popes and beatification for saints- so death is important and celebrated in the Catholic Church. I think its unusual to say that Mary’s death is not important because I would imagine that it would be one of the most celebrated feast in Catholic tradition. If she did die and is being celebrated (Dormition) which “GOODFELLA” is proclaiming in this forum, then why do you say you can choose to believe if she died or not??
The Catholic Church has very few non-negotiables.
If she didn’t die then where does it say in Catholic Tradition that “someone saw her assume into Heaven without death”???

Where is it??
I don’t know. It may or may not exist.
I find it strangely odd how Catholics keep a meticulous detailed track record and know about all the apostle’s death, every single pope, bishop, and saint, on where and how they died but NOTHING about if Mary, the Queen of Heaven, died or not or where she died??

Seriously, how does one NOT know if the QUEEN of Heaven, Mother of God died or not?
I see your point. Catholics would all love to have signed chain-of-custody documentation for every minute detail of every holy person that ever lived, every book of the bible, etc.

But even that would be scoffed at by non-believers.
 
OK you’re saying that she died. I’m confused because the early church father Epiphanus, in 377 AD stated:
  • If* the Holy Virgin had died and was buried, her falling asleep would have been surrounded with honour, death would have found her pure, and her crown would have been a virginal one…Had she been martyred according to what is written: ‘Thine own soul a sword shall pierce’, then she would shine gloriously among the martyrs, and her holy body would have been declared blessed; for by her, did light come to the world.” Epiphanius,Panarion,78:23(A.D. 377),in PG 42:737
Did she die? We do not know. At all events, if she was buried, she had no carnal intercourse. . . . Or she remained alive, since nothing is impossible with God and he can do whatever he desires” (Panarion, haer. 78, nn. 10-11,23: G.C.S., 37, 461-462; 474).

Also, you say that after Mary died in her tomb, she assumed into Heaven, and all this information was passed down apostolically.

So where is the exact location of her tomb where she assumed from located? This should be an extraordinary place of veneration for Catholics. (They knew where Peter died and so they built St. Peter’s Basilica over it. I would imagine they would do the same for someone deserving higher veneration)
Mary’s tomb is in the Valley of Jehosaphat (the Kidron Valley) to the east of Jerusalem near the Garden of Gethsemane. The tomb is situated in the Church of the Sepulchre of Mary built in the 5th century. The actual site of Mary’s burial was confirmed by a private revelation granted to St. Bridget of Sweden when our Blessed Mother appeared to her there while she was on a pilgrimage to the Holy Land. Epiphanius, Bishop of Salamis, was obviously unaware of this oral tradition that was mentioned by Bishop Juvenal of Jerusalem to the Emperor Marcion at the Council of Chalcedon in 451 - about 1100 years before Protestantism emerged. 😉

Pax Christu :harp:
 
Mary’s tomb is in the Valley of Jehosaphat (the Kidron Valley) to the east of Jerusalem near the Garden of Gethsemane. The tomb is situated in the Church of the Sepulchre of Mary built in the 5th century. The actual site of Mary’s burial was confirmed by a private revelation granted to St. Bridget of Sweden when our Blessed Mother appeared to her there while she was on a pilgrimage to the Holy Land. Epiphanius, Bishop of Salamis, was obviously unaware of this oral tradition that was mentioned by Bishop Juvenal of Jerusalem to the Emperor Marcion at the Council of Chalcedon in 451 - about 1100 years before Protestantism emerged. 😉

Pax Christu :harp:
Good info. Thanks!!
 
Good info. Thanks!!
My pleasure, Mark.

The shroud of our Lady has been kept in the Church of St. Mary of Blachnernae in former Constantinople for veneration since the 5th century. Until then this relic may have been a family keepsake like the shroud of Turin or kept in a church at Jerusalem.
 
I have a problem with this: Elijah.
5. “Now God has willed that the Blessed Virgin Mary should be exempted from this general rule. She, by an entirely unique privilege, completely overcame sin by her Immaculate Conception, and as a result she was not subject to the law of remaining in the grave, and she did not have to wait until the end of time for the redemption of her body.”
Pope Pius Xll, Munificentissimus Deus


Unless Elijah was conceived preserved free from the stain of original sin, a unique privilege belonging to Mary, and was completely sinless, I can’t imagine how he could be with her body and soul in heaven and in glory before the last day. Elijah must wait for the redemption of his body and resurrection until the end of time like the rest of fallen humankind.
  • For creation awaits with eager expectation the revelation of the children of God; for creation was made subject to futility, not of its own accord but by the one who subjected it, in hope that creation itself will be set free from slavery to corruption and share in the glorious freedom of the children of God. We know that all creation is groaning in labor pains even until now; and not only that, but we ourselves who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, we also groan within ourselves as we wait for adoption and the redemption of our bodies.*
    Romans 8, 18-23
The “heaven” in 2 Kings 2, 1, 11 isn’t the third heaven where God’s throne is situated. The Hebrew word for heaven is shamahym, accurately translated “the heavens”: to be in a lofty or high place or plane of existence.

PAX :harp:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top