Charismatic Roman Catholicism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hello_Operator
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I haven’t been following this thread very closely, but allow me to point out that then-Cardinal Ratzinger has several positive things to say (specifically) about the Charasmatic Movement in The Ratzinger Report.
 
Sr Ann Marie always says, “For those who believe no explanation is necessary, for those who don’t none will suffice.”
 
3 Principles of Spiritual Renewal (Pope Paul VI):
  1. Faithfulness to the authentic teaching of the Faith.
  2. Grateful reception of gifts.
  3. Supremacy of love over all the other gifts.
I think that it’s #1 where the origins of the charismatic movement falls quite short.
 
I think that it’s #1 where the origins of the charismatic movement falls quite short.
You may be interested in the brochure written by Jim Scully concerning the Charisimatic Renewal.
It was on May 19,1975 that Pope Paul VI gave special permission to Cardinal Seunens to celebrate Mass at the high altar of St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, normally reserved for the pope alone.
“In the beginning, many outside the movement feared the renewal, because of its links with Pentecostalism, would prove divisive and hostile to church authority. The Popes’ warm welcome indicates that the good communication between the movement’s leaders and the hierachy has averted this danger.”

“The charismatic movement propounds no new dogmas. Instead, it stresses the experiencing** of the truths Catholics already accept.”

With the release of the Spirit** or the *baptism (immersion) in the Spirit *, “in the individual its enduring results are a fresh courage, a desire to witness to the glorifed Jesus, and a faith that the Holy Spirit can continue to work in and through her or him by means of other manifestations or spiritual gifts (the charisms).”
 
You may be interested in the brochure written by Jim Scully concerning the Charisimatic Renewal.
It was on May 19,1975 that Pope Paul VI gave special permission to Cardinal Seunens to celebrate Mass at the high altar of St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, normally reserved for the pope alone.
“In the beginning, many outside the movement feared the renewal, because of its links with Pentecostalism, would prove divisive and hostile to church authority. The Popes’ warm welcome indicates that the good communication between the movement’s leaders and the hierachy has averted this danger.”

“The charismatic movement propounds no new dogmas. Instead, it stresses the experiencing** of the truths Catholics already accept.”

With the release of the Spirit** or the *baptism (immersion) in the Spirit *, “in the individual its enduring results are a fresh courage, a desire to witness to the glorifed Jesus, and a faith that the Holy Spirit can continue to work in and through her or him by means of other manifestations or spiritual gifts (the charisms).”
Here is a book I recommend to you and to anyone who wants to really learn more about the charismatic movement. traditioninaction.org/tiabk010.htm.
 
Whatever the Holy Spirit touches is santified and completely transformed—St. John of Chysotom
 
You may be interested in the brochure written by Jim Scully concerning the Charisimatic Renewal.
There are a host of references I can provide you and others who are involved or considering involvement with the charismatic movement. First and most importantly, we must start with God’s revealed truth and not with experiences. Therefore just because we personally may have experienced something or know someone else who has, does not validate the experience as originating from God. We must first examine God’s divine truth and revelation before accepting the charismatic movement as a whole as legitimate. There are so many branches and offshoots of this movement that do all sorts of insane things claiming them to be of divine origin.
Here are some websites to check out from both Catholic and Protestant sources describing and comparing the movement with divine revelation: (I do not endorse all the things on these sites (esp the Protestant ones) but I do think they can provoke thought and shed some light):
I also strongly recommend reading the book titled** “Enthusiasm” by Msgr. Ronald Knox**. The priest at my parish cited this book on Pentacost Sunday. In the book, the monsignor provides an honest evaluation of the movement.
 
Sr Ann Marie always says, “For those who believe no explanation is necessary, for those who don’t none will suffice.”
I don’t know who Sr. Ann Marie is. This quote (or something very close to it) is originally attributed to St. Thomas Aquinas. I’m not certain he had the CCR in mind when he said it.
 
Why not keep your reservations to yourself, which is certainly your right to hold them, and admit that you are not being led to the call of the CCR?
Are you suggesting that this thread be reserved for only those whose opinion of this movement be the one that aligns with your own? I’m sorry, I must have missed the “Moderator” tag in your message header, a thousand pardons for the unmitigated temerity to express an opinion contrary to the accepted one. I shall avail myself of a flagrum at the earliest possible convenience.
Each movement is going to have its share of weeds among the wheat, but we pray for discernment to identify the false and embrace that which is true.
Is this desire for discernment only for charismatics? Am I not entitled to pray for this same “discernment to identify the false and embrace that which is true?” And frankly, what if my prayers lead me to a different discernment than yours? Who wins? Oooh, yeah, I’m sorry…you got the last three popes in your corner, what was I thinking? 🤷
Jesus did not leave us orphans but promised His Spirit would be with us to bring us into all truth. Human reason can negate faith, which is precisely why He gave us the Church with the promise of the Spirit’s guidance. Is it possible you do not accept the testimony of three popes that the movement is aiuthentic? Why would you type a sentence like this, otherwise?
Hmmm…peculiar sentiment, considering one of the popes you cite had quite a bit to say about how faith and reason are not mutually exclusive. In fact, I think he wrote an entire encyclical on it.
There is nothing to discern with respect to the CCR movement being genuine - it is approved. The only problem you struggle with is how to discern the weeds among the wheat in the movement. As one who admits to having absolutely no call to embrace it, why is this a concern of yours to oppose solid teaching from the Church solely based on your bad experience?
Ahhh, now we’ve hit upon it. Nothing to discern? This is precisely why so many have an issue with the movement. It places itself beyond reproach. Nevermind the numerous and well-documented abuses, the lack of solid theology, the peculiar circumstances surrounding its beginnings, the amorphous nature of its leadership and all that. It’s the experience that trumps all. And once you’ve been “experienced”, God help anyone who happens to come down the pike with legitimate questions. You’ve turned your hand on this one, I’m afraid. Discernment is an aspect of every facet of our faith, nothing is left sacrosanct, but is inspected and approved based on its merits and foundations. The Church would not have lasted two millennia, through persecutions and heresies and what-have-you, if they had early on adopted this laissez-faire attitude with regard to any point of doctrine.
 
I just posted an article from Pope Benedict last week. There was not a single word of warning. It was complete praise and encouragement. May we please have the sources for your statement?
Well, okay, if you insist. How about for starters we look at a little document you might have heard of called Lumen Gentium? It’s called the dogmatic constitution on the Church, and sprang from the wacky minds of those guys back during the heady days of Vatican II. And according to at least one pro-CCR website, the following passage is considered by many within the movement to be the “magna carta” for the Renewal.
Paragraph 12
The holy people of God shares also in Christ’s prophetic office; it spreads abroad a living witness to Him, especially by means of a life of faith and charity and by offering to God a sacrifice of praise, the tribute of lips which give praise to His name.(110) The entire body of the faithful, anointed as they are by the Holy One,(111) cannot err in matters of belief. They manifest this special property by means of the whole peoples’ supernatural discernment in matters of faith when “from the Bishops down to the last of the lay faithful” (8*) they show universal agreement in matters of faith and morals. That discernment in matters of faith is aroused and sustained by the Spirit of truth. It is exercised under the guidance of the sacred teaching authority, in faithful and respectful obedience to which the people of God accepts that which is not just the word of men but truly the word of God.(112) Through it, the people of God adheres unwaveringly to the faith given once and for all to the saints,(113) penetrates it more deeply with right thinking, and applies it more fully in its life.
It is not only through the sacraments and the ministries of the Church that the Holy Spirit sanctifies and leads the people of God and enriches it with virtues, but, "allotting his gifts to everyone according as He wills,(114) He distributes special graces among the faithful of every rank. By these gifts He makes them fit and ready to undertake the various tasks and offices which contribute toward the renewal and building up of the Church, according to the words of the Apostle: “The manifestation of the Spirit is given to everyone for profit”.(115) These charisms, whether they be the more outstanding or the more simple and widely diffused, are to be received with thanksgiving and consolation for they are perfectly suited to and useful for the needs of the Church. Extraordinary gifts are not to be sought after, nor are the fruits of apostolic labor to be presumptuously expected from their use; but judgment as to their genuinity and proper use belongs to those who are appointed leaders in the Church, to whose special competence it belongs, not indeed to extinguish the Spirit, but to test all things and hold fast to that which is good.(116)
Emphasis added by me. I think that’s a pretty weighty *caveat *to be observed, n’est-ce pas?
If you were honestly seeking truth, it would be a simple matter for you to search out the many factual articles posted on the forum in order to clarify your doubts … IF you were truly seeking.
I find it highly presumptive of you to question any aspect of my sincerity, with regard to this or indeed any issue whatsoever. Do you know me? Have you been provided some “word of knowledge” about me? Is there any legitimate reason other than your own hostility to even question my sincerity or the degree of genuine concern I have over this topic? Indeed, I found my post from earlier (now yesterday) to be rather conciliatory all things considered. Then you come out of left field, guns a-blazin’, as if I’m the emissary for the son of perdition himself. Of course, in Christian charity, I forgive you. Perhaps in your zeal to defend your position, you got carried away. I know how that can happen.

Grace and peace to you.
 
Irish Saints–I would not want the elitism you sense to be a stumbling block to receiving the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.
It is true that each of us has been sealed by the Holy Spirit at Baptism and Confirmation.
I know that in my own life, the manifestation of these gifts is something that I had not expected. I did not even know what the Charismatic Renewal was when I found myself a part of it.
There are some things that can be explained and others that cannot which why the Church investigates apparitions. Did the person actually see the statue of Mary cry or did the plumbing break? Once at Mass, I "saw " an impression of our Lord in the Eucharist. There are several reasonable explanations. It could have been simply my imagination or it could have been how the light streaming through the windows struck the host at that particular moment while it was being elevated.
Other things are much more difficult to explain and they are a very real part of my life. To deny the experiences would be to deny Christ and how God has worked in my life.
I mentioned a book earlier about the Baptism of the Holy Spirit during the first eight centuries of the Church. I found the book listed on Amazon.com and was only able to get glimpses of the different fathers of the Church and the gifts that were mentioned.
I did read the reviews including one mentioning the belief taught by some protestant churches that the Baptism of the Holy Spirit ended with the Apostles. Indeed it was a non-Catholic, a Baptist that I met who claimed there were no miracles after the time of the Apostles. This we all know is patently against Catholic teaching.
To the point, Fr. Montague writes in this month’s Word Among Us** of his experience, “a new spiritual energy burst up from within me. From then on, my life and ministry became alive in a way they never had been before.” He continues to write about other changes, the ones not filled with “alleluias” The Charismatic Renewal is about much more than emotional highs.
 
Irish Saints:
Are you suggesting that this thread be reserved for only those whose opinion of this movement be the one that aligns with your own? I’m sorry, I must have missed the “Moderator” tag in your message header, a thousand pardons for the unmitigated temerity to express an opinion contrary to the accepted one. I shall avail myself of a flagrum at the earliest possible convenience.
I noted above that the original post inquired:
OP:
Naturally, one of the questions that developed as I listened to this description of the university was whether or not this charismatic movement is sanctioned within the RCC. Does the Pope have a stance? whether the CCR has the approval of the Church?
What should be apparent to all is that this original post did not ask for a diatribe of the movement based on one’s personal bad experiences, and an exposé of why one should not listen to the authentic guidance of the Church. My comment stands: “Why not keep your reservations to yourself.” They are off-topic. If you read the OP again, the person was very positive and and enthused. So who are the pundits, I ask, who stepped in to puncture his good will?

I noted your indignation previously due to Deacon Ed B using the word “nay-sayer,” and your subsequent request to withhold the “claws.” Have you the only license to use claws? Your entire reply is filled with nastiness, which usually develops in these threads due to the extreme animosity of those who oppose the CCR. Again, it is off-topic. We should be discussing only the lawful approval of the Church, as requested in the OP. I invite you to start your own thread, called “Why do some people detest the CCR.”
Is this desire for discernment only for charismatics? Am I not entitled to pray for this same “discernment to identify the false and embrace that which is true?” And frankly, what if my prayers lead me to a different discernment than yours? Who wins? Oooh, yeah, I’m sorry…you got the last three popes in your corner, what was I thinking?
Sarcasm noted. Obviously, the papal endorsements are a thorn you would like to avoid at all costs. Remember, Pope Benedict did not simply say the CCR is approved. He went a step beyond basic approval, adding his own praise and encouragement. Coming from HIM, that is a very strong endorsement!

I should not need to explain the ‘discernment’ phrase, if you had read my words in the spirit in which they were given. I repeat them. “Each movement is going to have its share of weeds among the wheat, but we pray for discernment to identify the false and embrace that which is true.” Let’s look at these words in a respectful manner. EACH movement, which includes many like Opus Dei, Focolare, Blue Army, Knights of Columbus, Cursillo, and yes, even apparition seekers … is going to have its share of weeds. WE ALL must pray for discernment, which is inclusive of people like yourself.
Joysong said:
There is nothing to discern with respect to the CCR movement being genuine - it is approved.
Ahhh, now we’ve hit upon it. Nothing to discern? This is precisely why so many have an issue with the movement. It places itself beyond reproach.

Nothing to discern with regard to approval. The discernment required was mentioned in the preceding paragraph. the CCR does not place itself beyond reproach. This is solely your wrong assumption.
Then you come out of left field, guns a-blazin’, as if I’m the emissary for the son of perdition himself. Of course, in Christian charity, I forgive you. Perhaps in your zeal to defend your position, you got carried away. I know how that can happen.
This is colored by your rash judgment of my post. Beauty, and yes ugliness, lies in the eye of the beholder. That which is received, is received according to your own faulty misperception. The only guns a-blazin’ are your own.
 
Una Fides:
We must first examine God’s divine truth and revelation before accepting the charismatic movement as a whole as legitimate. There are so many branches and offshoots of this movement that do all sorts of insane things claiming them to be of divine origin.
Not. We must listen to the Church, who has the primary task of examining each and every movement to detect possible heresy, and then speak on God’s behalf to the faithful. With the attestation of three popes saying the movement is of God, we have no duty to examine further. It is not required of us, other than to trust the Church who is Divinely appointed to guide us.

The problem lies with those who wear the mask of the sheep, infiltrate the fold, and attempt to foil God’s work with the insane things that are not from Him. This is where local authority has the duty of shepherding.

And let’s not forget that there are many things we are unable to understand due to one’s own faith formation being limited. It is very possible to err with private judgment simply due to lack of proper understanding and/or a lawful call to a certain movement. Those who are not called, are not ready, and will not understand, as Pani Rose mentioned above. Let him embrace it who is called.
 
Another timely providential message from Rome this morning in my inbox [edited for brevity]:
ROCCA DI PAPA, Italy, MAY 15, 2008 (Zenit.org).- Bishops are gathered near Rome to invoke the Holy Spirit’s aid in welcoming movements and communities into the fabric of local Churches.
A key for these days, he said, is the common invoking of the Holy Spirit to “better know and understand the project of God in these new charisms, correctly discern their genuine character and ordered use in the bosom of Christian communities, welcome them with trust and gratitude into the fabric of the Churches entrusted to our pastoral care” and to offer them support “in their mission with an authentic spirit of spiritual fatherhood.”
“Pastors – and this has to be forcefully emphasized – should not see movements and new communities as another ‘problem’ they have to deal with, but rather as a ‘providential gift’ that the Church should receive with gratitude and a sense of responsibility, so as not to waste the resource they represent,” he added.
Discernment
This gift implies duties for laypeople as well as for bishops, Cardinal Rylko affirmed. He noted how Pope John Paul II insisted that these new realities are called to insert themselves into the dioceses and parishes “with humility …] at the service of the mission of the Church and avoiding any type of exclusiveness or …] attitudes of superiority regarding others.”
Cardinal Ratzinger, as the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, highlighted that “in the Church there is no contrast and contraposition between the institutional dimension and the charismatic dimension, of which the movements are a significant expression,” Cardinal Rylko recalled.
And Cardinal Ratzinger affirmed that “integration can never mean homologation because ecclesial communion is not an absolute uniformity, but rather unity in diversity,” Cardinal Rylko added.
He continued, “As Pope, [Ratzinger] continues insisting on the importance of the criteria of docility to the action of the Spirit in the bosom of the ecclesial communion.”
Regarding Church-movement relationship, Cardinal Rylko stated, the current Pope has given priority to the Pauline rule “do not snuff out the charisms,” …
 
Una Fides:
Here is a book I recommend to you and to anyone who wants to really learn more about the charismatic movement. traditioninaction.org/tiabk010.htm.
I am astounded that anyone would lead an honest inquirer to read a book from a website, titled, The Charismatic Movement Exposed and not offer the teachings of the Church so the person can hear both sides. This website is flagged red danger and is notorious for its opposition to the Catholic Church and her leaders.

Was this thread transferred from Traditional Catholic Forum? I see many posts that are objectioning to CCR due to the highly conservative nature of those who post in that forum. It explains the one-sided unfounded bias. :rolleyes: One is perfectly within their right to cling to those traditions that speak to one’s soul as a matter of personal preference, but it is wrong to impose that preference upon others as though one is not following the Church and in danger of hell-fire.
 
I am astounded that anyone would lead an honest inquirer to read a book from a website, titled, The Charismatic Movement Exposed and not offer the teachings of the Church so the person can hear both sides. ** This website** is flagged red danger and is notorious for its opposition to the Catholic Church and her leaders.
Was this thread transferred from Traditional Catholic Forum? I see many posts that are objectioning to CCR due to the highly conservative nature of those who post in that forum. It explains the one-sided unfounded bias. :rolleyes: One is perfectly within their right to cling to those traditions that speak to one’s soul as a matter of personal preference, but it is wrong to impose that preference upon others as though one is not following the Church and in danger of hell-fire.
Yuck. Follow the “Examples” link. The site has pure libel against the Pope. I fail to see how any Catholic could endorse everything this site says.
 
Having been away from my computer a bit, I see there has been much that has gone on and said back and forth. I have reached one conclusion and that is I will let JOYSONG and DEBCHRIS do my light fighting. WOW. such direct, reasoned and document supported answers. Good work.

For those who do not want to be a part of the Charismatic Renewal, if you feel this is not for you, it is not for you. Period. No one is twisting your arm and saying you have to be part of it or that you are any less Catholic because of it. I believe Joysosng quoted one of the cardinals as saying that we can have unity in diversity. As part of the Mystical Body, we are all different parts and each of us has a different function. We should use our strengths in supporting Holy Mother Church instead of fighting among ourselves. We are not all popes, cardinals, bishops, priests or deacons. Each of us is a saint want to be. Your form of prayer is not mine and mine is not yours. God works in each of us in different ways, with one goal. Eternity with him. Lets support each other in this quest and pray for each other.

We have saints in religious orders and in lay people, ;and unfortunately sinners in each. This is why we pray for each other, everyday and always. I would say, do be careful of the web sites you use or the books you use. Especially those which always say they are pointing out all that is bad with some part of the Church in order to make it better. That only hurts all of us. and is of Satan. If you ask why is the Catholic Church always under attack, just remember the wolf does not attack the false sheep.
Prayers & Blessings
Deacon Ed B
 
Having been away from my computer a bit, I see there has been much that has gone on and said back and forth. I have reached one conclusion and that is I will let JOYSONG and DEBCHRIS do my light fighting. WOW. such direct, reasoned and document supported answers. Good work.

For those who do not want to be a part of the Charismatic Renewal, if you feel this is not for you, it is not for you. Period. No one is twisting your arm and saying you have to be part of it or that you are any less Catholic because of it. I believe Joysosng quoted one of the cardinals as saying that we can have unity in diversity. As part of the Mystical Body, we are all different parts and each of us has a different function. We should use our strengths in supporting Holy Mother Church instead of fighting among ourselves. We are not all popes, cardinals, bishops, priests or deacons. Each of us is a saint want to be. Your form of prayer is not mine and mine is not yours. God works in each of us in different ways, with one goal. Eternity with him. Lets support each other in this quest and pray for each other.

We have saints in religious orders and in lay people, ;and unfortunately sinners in each. This is why we pray for each other, everyday and always. I would say, do be careful of the web sites you use or the books you use. Especially those which always say they are pointing out all that is bad with some part of the Church in order to make it better. That only hurts all of us. and is of Satan. If you ask why is the Catholic Church always under attack, just remember the wolf does not attack the false sheep.
Prayers & Blessings
Deacon Ed B
How well said for the above and the other thread you and I both participated yesterday!

It is important to have words as such from a church deacon who has better training than most lay people.

How right you are that we have to be careful about websites that mix truth and fall statements together to trick people. How true that there are many wolves out there in sheep’s skin. That is nothing new, Jesus has already warned that.

The problem I see is that many Catholics are not alert enough about the enemy’s tactic. Even real spiritual people could be momentarily tricked if not carefully evaulate what they glanced on a website.

It is never my intention to raise any debate with anybody; but it is critical to raise a red flag when it is necessary.

Thanks for your (name removed by moderator)ut above and the (name removed by moderator)ut you gave yesterday on another thread.
 
In 800 messages (at least as of this post), the scope of the original post grew beyond the bounds and intents of the original poster. This sort of organic growth and tengential exploration is a part of what is called “dialog”, and typically occurs naturally when there isn’t someone attempting to quash such a development.

Nevertheless, you have your wish. This will be my last post in this or any CAF forum. So long as I have the “option” of taking or leaving the CCR, I will leave it. In spades. Running. In the opposite direction. Rapidly.

Insofar as the “movement” will ALLOW me to “take it or leave it”, I will do so. As I encounter it (or likely, as it encounters me) I would be ill-served to simply be steam-rolled by something I don’t buy. So I will continue to voice my concerns.

Nice dodge of LG 12, btw. 👍

Toodles, folks. Would like to say it’s been real, and it’s been fun, but it hasn’t been real fun. Enjoy your blah-blah.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top