"Chaste" same-sex dating ok with Church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ToeInTheWater
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As a Catholic with SSA, I feel a need to weigh in on this. There are too many posts to respond to individually, so I will simply state my mind on this issue and respond only to one earlier post.

First, I think the notion that two homosexual Christians could be involved in chaste, same-sex “dating” without presenting immense spiritual dangers to themselves is ridiculous, and the pursuit itself probably constitutes sin of some sort. A guy and a girl don’t get involved in chaste dating for friendship; they do it to test the waters of romance and discern marriage and mature sexual union. Likewise, two homosexual Christians can’t get involved in anything that could conceivably be called dating without such an end in play, even if they’re in denial about it.

With that said I turn to the same-sex friendships of homosexuals. First, not implying that anyone in this thread has so claimed, the notion that a male homosexual like myself cannot be involved in loving and deep friendships with other men without presenting spiritual danger to oneself is both ludicrous and insulting. I have a few very deep friendships with other Christian men, and the goodness and joy of those relationships has actually given me strength and rest in the fight against my homosexual urges. We hug each other regularly, go to movies or restaurants both one-on-one and in a group, have heartfelt man-to-man conversations, write letters to one another, and say “I love you” to each other. They’re all heterosexual, if you want to know.

I’m sure many guys out there would balk at such activity between friends. This, I think, is a major contribution to the problem: the idea of male friendships has been so impoverished with the growing societal presence of homophobia and warped ideals of masculinity. The reason why I am able to participate in such living relationships is because I discovered that true, Christian, and biblical friendship is not about what kind of emotional sustenance I can get out of it; it is about mutual sacrifice, love, and growth as Christian men.

My friendships with these men are not about me, my homosexuality, or what kind of perverse or pathetic, grasping sustenance I can get out of them. I pour my heart out for my friends’ sake; I give myself for them in the hopes that they can be loved, loving, and mature Christian men.

Now that I’ve made that clear, I also agree with the many here who emphasize the need to be discerning and honest about one’s intentions and feelings when involved in same-sex friendships. If before God you honestly can’t say that you aren’t having struggles with romantic or sexual thoughts toward friends of your gender, then you must be doubly cautious of the level of intimacy, especially physical, you participate in. While it may or may not be silly to completely cut off contact with the friend, you must take steps to ensure your spiritual health.

Congratulations on your joining the Catholic faith, brother. I was fully initiated only two years ago. I’m now 23 years old, and from my own experience, I must advise you to take major precautions in your struggle here. I fooled myself into thinking I could get into an intimate friendship with someone I had very similar feelings about, and over time it simply got more and more out of control. I came out of that situation having done some pretty severe spiritual damage to myself; thankfully through both the strength and purity of my other friendships and my eventual separation from this friend God has achieved much healing in me.

I ask you in all humility, brother, to take counsel in prayer with God and yourself. Ask him for wisdom and clear sight in this struggle, and the strength to do what needs to be done to guard your fidelity to him, who is to be our most beloved above all others.

To give something of an answer to your questions, I don’t think you should concern yourself mostly with “was the hug a sin?” or “would hugging him be a sin?” (personally, I don’t think accepting a hug from him would be sinful) but the examination I noted above.
Oh for Pete’s sake.

Dating is a series of actions meant to engender romance. Can a married man licitly have romance with a woman other than his wife? No. Why not? Because it is ordered toward union. That union is called marriage.

If two people court and then break up, one might remark that “it never went anywhere”. Well, where does it actually go? Marriage and sex is where it is supposed to go.

I’m sure it’s a tough personal problem to suffer from SSA. It’s tough as a heterosexual male to have lust issues. Maybe you don’t “choose it” or “ask for it” (or maybe you do… let’s set that aside because it doesn’t matter). The fact is, it is our responsibility to choose rightly.

If two individuals experience SSA, especially if they experience it for one another, they should refrain from physical contact beyond what would be the norm for two heterosexual male friends. No holding hands, no backrubs, no kissing. No foot massages, right?

It’s not merely our responsbility to avoid performative sins, it’s also our responsibility to avoid near occasions of sin. It can be a difficult journey sometimes. But we all know what the destination is, and what happens in the event of failure. If we want to show our love for God, we need to keep His commandments. One of the main things that takes is trust. Trying to skirt around the rules implies a lack of trust.

If you’re drawn to something that you know is sinful, don’t put yourself in that situation. Avoid it, do something else.
Couldn’t say it better myself. Thanks. 👍
 
Thanks. I actually have a lot of friends. The better ones aren’t practicing Catholics, unfortunately.

I was addressing the general tone taken towards people with SSA by Catholics in general…a tone of fear and mistrust, so keep them separate and let’s not even make the pretense of being equal…homosexual people are inferior to others in the Church. Can’t be priests or religious, can’t get married. Can’t have romantic relationships. Can’t do this. Can’t do that. It’s all about what people with SSA can NOT do.

Now, I believe that SSA can be overcome by some people and I’ve made progress in that area. To be honest, I stopped asking God to help me because He never seemed interested in healing me from SSA, so I’m pursuing healing as best as I can. Hmmmm. How do you KNOW that God is not answering you now? Sometimes we have to take action too.🙂 I see other men much differently than I used to and I am starting to see women differently too.🙂 I’m starting to see both more completely, which helps me to relate to each appropriately, seeing them as a full human being, just like me.
 
Elts1956 was suggesting I recieve the help of a counselor, when I have clearly dealt with SSA my entire life, and believe its effects (as well as the “disorder” as Elts1956 might consider it) cannot be countered to say the least. What should I reconsider? I am labeled as “disordered” by many who would also call me “brother”, His Holiness would also consider me “disordered”.

There is no one to talk to, and infact my parents don’t even know of my SSA. All of my support I recieve from Catholic Answer Forums. I am alone. My parents would disown me if they found out, I have no friends worthy of trusting, and now it even seems God has abandoned me. My options are few.
Your entire post is a mass of reasons why it would be a really good idea for you to find someone to talk to. You’ve been dealing with this for so long on your own you are under a lot of stress. I don’t care if SSA is not going to turn into opposite-sex attractions, but it will relieve you significantly to find someone to talk to. What about a teacher or guidance counsellor?
 
I dunno, I got the same kind of tone from her post. To me, it seemd like she just JUMPED on it, a;;, omigoodness, you like guys, you need to go see your priest right now so you can know why you’re like this!"
a “counselor” ain’t gonna do nothing. getting to the root of any psychological damage, assuming there IS any, would take years with a trained clinical psychiatrist, not some social worker.

Sorry, but in my exoerience, counselors and social workers and the like just talk about how to ignore stuff and move on. My last one actually had to go to WIKIPEDIA to diagnose my depression.

ANYway, my pont is, he was offended by the fact that she automatically assumed there was something to CAUSE this, that there was some horror in his past that made him like guys
I’m glad you understand how I felt when I read her post. I agree, a counselor is not needed.
You are talking eternity here Phil. This is a spiritual matter as well as emotional. If I were you, I would get all the help I could from dependable sources such as a priest for spiritual guidance and a non judgemental Catholic counselor who is experienced in matters such as this. Counselors come in many shapes and sizes. Nothing to fear in admiting one needs help. And you do. You have some serious business going on within you. I notice you “jumped” on Shondrea’s? opinion you don’t need help. Sometimes the answers we want are not the ones we need. Although I am In fear of being assumed judgemental, I will pray for you.
 
Bravo To Chris258 for your courage and sound insight. You have my deepest respect, sir.

God Bless,

Truth Addict
 
Depends on what type of counselor you go to. I have seen some great changes in folks who have someone who is non-jugemental to talk to about their confusions, anxieties etc. And since active sexual homosexuality is a Mortal sin (I’m not saying this young man has delved into this, get it straight please), don’t you think some good spiritual advice would be called for?" This isn’t just a gee what movie am I going to see next situation, but one that will affect his eternal life.
Not really no. Everytime I’VE gone to see a pritest about some problem, its the exact same advice. Pray, read the Bible, be strong. He knows this already. I doubt most priests would give any advice that isn’t common sense. Hey yo, don’t go doin guys. It’s kinda hot in hell this time of year. All Catholic KNOW this already. I don’t see how that would do him any better than seeing a liscenced professional. You can’t get a grasp of your religious self if your mentla self is a wreck
 
So, let me get this straight (no pun intended) –

The Church considers homosexuality gravely disordered and demands that homosexuals remain celibate, as it does all other unmarried heterosexuals.

Yet, this thread claims that two homosexuals who are attracted to one another cannot go to a movie together, to dinner together, to a party together, travel together, or any other “fun” activity that can be considered “dating” events, even if they remain 100% chaste at all times and have NO intention to ever be involved sexually… and even if they are celibate, practicing, committed Catholics.
Chastity is more than abstainance. No one in this life is 100% chaste. It is a virtue we are striving to obtain and to grow in whether we have same sex attraction or not.

I would say it is totally appropriate for people with same sex attraction to foster good Christian friendships with each other. Christian friendship can indeed be profoundly deeper than what the secular culture tells us that friendship is. In fact, I recently listened to NPR accuse Ven Cardinal John Henry Newman as homosexual simply because he had a deep and profoundly Christian friendship with another man that had such an impact on him, they were originally buried together in the same grave.

I recently listened to a talk on Christian friendship in a talk geared toward men located here: catholicaudio.blogspot.com/2010/09/fr-john-riccardo-male-friendship.html

In brief though, I’d say look at the friendship of Sam and Frodo. They supported each other on a shared cause and were there for each other.

The problem is that in our language, we have one word, “love”, that refers to multiple different experiences and we have trouble because of that identifying when we are fostering a good chaste friendship and when we are striving to satisfy eros by techniqually avoiding obvious sexual sin but not getting the fullness of what chastity is. In fact, I do believe that the Catechism says that chastity is rooted in Christian friendship.
 
Because I pretty much stopped talking to Him and that’s when the healing began.
hmmm I take issue with the fact that your stopped suffering so much as soon as you stopped asking God for help.

Not that help isn’t bad, but if for some reason abandoning your reliance on God is helping you, I dare say something wrong is going on.
 
hmmm I take issue with the fact that your stopped suffering so much as soon as you stopped asking God for help.

Not that help isn’t bad, but if for some reason abandoning your reliance on God is helping you, I dare say something wrong is going on.
So would I. It seems that He doesn’t want to help me and would rather leave me in much and mire of same-sex attractions with no help or comfort whatsoever, just white knuckle it and remain a third-class citizen in the Kingdom.

Actually, in light of a video that just came out (Vortex episode Catholic and Homosexual on YouTube), I see it being a possibility that God not only allowed SSA to develop in me but actually FOISTED it upon me. It was hard enough to trust Him when He sat by watching the abuse that went on in my life and He did NOTHING whatosever to comfort or help me. If it’s true that He foisted it upon me, how can He be trusted. If God would do that to me (which feels like a betrayal), how can He be relied on for anything?

Look at it this way. You have a son you love very much and you want him to love you. You walk up to him, say, “I love you” and proceed to hit him as hard in the stomach as you can. As he doubles over, you take your fists, put them together hit him on small of the back and tell him that you want him to love you back. That’s what SSA is like. First, God gives me the SSA (the punch to the stomach) and then draws me to a Church where I am not even a second class citizen (the hit on the back). That’s what this feels like, to me. How can I trust someone who would do that to me?
 
Same-sex couples are not allowed to date or do anything that those who date would normally do, like kiss.

This is because dating is done to discern marriage. Since same sex couples cannot be married they cannot date (or court).
Dating is typically to find a strong mutual connection, not always specifically for marriage–it varies depending on the case. I think saying it’s just for marriage is a selfish personal opinion.

Think to yourself, if a straight person would do this, would I have the same reaction? Try not to judge, do the Christ-like thing.

Of course there are those limits, like heavily making out in public around children–children, or people for that matter don’t need to see that, straight or gay. I think it’s extremely disrespectful when people do so, but I also think a lot of people go SEVERELY too far if it’s a homosexual doing ANYTHING slightly sexual.
 
Not really no. Everytime I’VE gone to see a pritest about some problem, its the exact same advice. Pray, read the Bible, be strong. He knows this already. I doubt most priests would give any advice that isn’t common sense. Hey yo, don’t go doin guys. It’s kinda hot in hell this time of year. All Catholic KNOW this already. I don’t see how that would do him any better than seeing a liscenced professional. You can’t get a grasp of your religious self if your mentla self is a wreck
If Phil were to talk to a Priest in Confession, the Graces he receives from that Sacrament would help if he will let them in. Or has Confession been abandoned altogether by the younger generation?
 
You have a son you love very much and you want him to love you. You walk up to him, say, “I love you” and proceed to hit him as hard in the stomach as you can. As he doubles over, you take your fists, put them together hit him on small of the back and tell him that you want him to love you back. That’s what SSA is like.
Hi LCMSNM. Look, I’m really sorry that some Catholics have made you feel like a third class citizen. I’m sorry if this topic has made you feel less welcome. I really didn’t realize that this topic would develop this way. I’m still a little confused as to how the Church teaches someone with SSA should behave, but this is really more a theoretical question for me. Obviously, it’s not theoretical for you.

Philology, if you’re still following this, my heart goes out to you, too. I’m sorry if my question has resulted in causing you more pain, too.

So, if either one of you thinks this topic should be closed at this point, please let me know and I will ask the mods to do so. I understand that as the OP I am able to do that.
 
Depends on what type of counselor you go to. I have seen some great changes in folks who have someone who is non-jugemental to talk to about their confusions, anxieties etc. And since active sexual homosexuality is a Mortal sin (I’m not saying this young man has delved into this, get it straight please), don’t you think some good spiritual advice would be called for?" This isn’t just a gee what movie am I going to see next situation, but one that will affect his eternal life.
You must not be understanding brother; I have no one to turn to but you here on this lovely forum. I am not a Catholic at this moment, but within a year I will most likely start my process into joining the faith. There is no possible way for face to face conversation for me on the subject. I thank you for your help, but there is no where left to turn but here.
 
If it is alright with you, I think the disscussion should be closed. I am venting to much frustration on this thread (as are others), and I think it would be best for everyone if this thread was closed.
 
I think I understand what you are saying here but I don’t think it applies in all cases. When I was a nun I had intimate relationships with many os my sisters. We shared all on a spiritual and emotional level and would often embrace and kiss the cheek as a sister was going away from the convent for some purpose. I loved and was loved deeply there and there was never a hint of anything sexual going on. I think we need to be open to uplifting people of either gender and to deny these close friendships would be to deny one of God’s gifts to us. I don’t wish to inflame anyone. I’m just sayin’…

QUOTE=Earnest Bunbury;7102313]If a married man can have a chaste relationship with another woman than his wife then what “Toe in the Water” suggests is fine. But the married man cannot do this because it is not just about sex but it is about intimacy. This is part of the deeper spiritual level we nurture by our external actions. Something that is not bad “in an of itself” still may not be the “good” that we are called to seek and to do in union with God and to merit by those actions, heaven. This is the storing up of treasures we are to do.

An intimate relationship with a member of the same sex, even without sexual stimulation, is spiritual and this is not the complementary help we need nor have been called to nurture for ourselves. Friendship does not rise to this level of intimacy and seems to me to be where we are to keep same sex relationships, separating ourselves from even this if we cannot avoid falling into levels of intimacy with them.

Women complement men in deeply spiritual levels and help make him who, in his nature made by God, is supposed to be.
 
Hi LCMSNM. Look, I’m really sorry that some Catholics have made you feel like a third class citizen. I’m sorry if this topic has made you feel less welcome. I really didn’t realize that this topic would develop this way. I’m still a little confused as to how the Church teaches someone with SSA should behave, but this is really more a theoretical question for me. Obviously, it’s not theoretical for you.
Actually, I’ve been working on a lot of the issues that lead me to become SSA. The third class citizen thing has to do with the practically nonexistent options for vocations available to someone like me: no priesthood, no marriage, no religious life.

Basically, the Church’s teachings on SSA is don’t act on it. End of line. It says more than that, but there’s nothing about options for vocations or how one is to live one’s life. It’s something that no heterosexual person can possibly understand. Think about it…if you’re straight, you have a world of options. You can become a priest, join a religious order, get married, etc. You have choices that you can make based on what you think will work best for you.

Add this to the equation. Generally speaking, people with same-sex attractions tend to have a greater need for human contact and affection, which they can never, ever have fulfilled, especially considering the fear and loathing directed towards people with SSA. You may have no idea what a hug can do for a person, but I do because sometimes, that’s ALL I need. Just a little hug, but according to many, that’s a near occasion of sin and I’m to avoid it. God isn’t in the business of giving hugs, at least physically, except through His people. Think about that…all you want is a hug. Not a grope, not a kiss, not sex, just a simple embrace and even that is considered taboo. How would you feel after realizing that is all you will ever know for the rest of your life, and maybe after?

Personally, I don’t buy the no hug rule and give and receive hugs freely because I see no sin in them.

Now, take the lack of options for vocation along with that and you may only begin to see the exquisite suffering that many people with SSA live with. Now, add to THAT the constant condemnation coming from Catholics of homosexuality and the continual threats and warnings about chastity (as though a person with SSA could FORGET!) and how virtually all discrimination against people with SSA is just discrimination. It seems as though other people feel superior to people with SSA, who are relegated to some sort of sub-human status. That’s the third class citizen thing I was talking about. Some say that God loves people like that more intensely than most and that He uses their suffering to help people. I see SSA as a curse, not a cross.
Philology, if you’re still following this, my heart goes out to you, too. I’m sorry if my question has resulted in causing you more pain, too.
So, if either one of you thinks this topic should be closed at this point, please let me know and I will ask the mods to do so. I understand that as the OP I am able to do that.
 
I see SSA as a curse, not a cross.
I believe that simple sentence defines why the way so many Catholics approach homosexuality is a problem. When someone makes the struggle with their sexuality known (like Philogy has), the most common responses are “that’s a problem you should get fixed” and “don’t have sex” and “there is no gay gene.” I know that most people mean well when they offer advice, I just believe there is a better way.

Every, single human being’s sexuality will, at some point or another in their lives, be a cross to bear. For someone dealing with a homosexual orientation, that cross can be more “all-encompassing”, if you will. A person with a homosexual orientation isn’t offered a healthy or “non-sinful” outlet to the PHYSICAL aspect of their sexuality. I believe true help and healing can only come by looking at what someone with a homosexual orientation IS offered. That, I believe, is the key.

Every cross should be embraced. If all we do is tell someone that they must change their cross or that the very cross itself is disordered, we help to turn what could be a redemptive cross into a suffocating curse. It’s as if we say, “You shouldn’t even carry that cross because it’s so ugly.”

We must be able to face the undeniable fact that for many (SO very many), their homosexual orientation does not go away with counseling and prayer. We have got to ask ourselves, “What then?” Can we encourage someone to embrace even THAT cross?

I pray every day that God will make me exactly the man he wants me to be. If that man happens to be SSA, I’m okay with that. In fact, I will embrace that because I know that the most passionate, loving, beautiful love in the history of the world had nothing to do with sex and everything to do with a cross. THAT love, I will never be denied. What I will ask myself (and God), and what I would ask anyone with SSA to ask themselves is this: In what way can I offer the love my soul wants so badly to offer? How can I give of myself while I embrace this cross?

It’s not a matter of what I can’t do, or what I’m not allowed to do. It’s a matter of what I CAN do, how I CAN share my love. If you ask God to help you love, He simply cannot leave that prayer unanswered because He IS love. God loves you and He loves me. God even loves my sexuality. Why? Because it is a gift I CAN offer to Him.

Peace,
Kolbe
 
I have requested the topic be closed, but I would like to say that I do not personally consider people with SSA to be any worse sinners than the rest of us. There are many who have inclinations to drink to excess, lash out violently, participate in gossip, be envious of others, etc. I think those who act on those inclinations are certainly worse sinners than those who suffer with SSA and heroically continue to live a chaste life. I don’t think God looks at such people as “subhuman”, but it seems that many individual Catholics may have that tendency (as do many people of other religions, or even no religion at all). I think it is sometimes too easy to point fingers at other people for sins that you figure you could never fall into yourself. But I think of Jesus and the woman caught in adultery. Perhaps the men who wanted to stone her were guilty of adultery themselves, and it seems some people interpret the story that way. But in that case the message would be “Yes, you can throw stones, but only at people who have committed different sins than you”. And it seems some Catholics do behave as if that was indeed the message. I think, though, that while some in the crowd likely had committed sexual sin, it wasn’t all of them. Yet even those who weren’t guilty of that particular sin did not cast any stones at her, once challenged by Jesus. I think that is something to think about.
 
I believe that simple sentence defines why the way so many Catholics approach homosexuality is a problem. When someone makes the struggle with their sexuality known (like Philogy has), the most common responses are “that’s a problem you should get fixed” and “don’t have sex” and “there is no gay gene.” I know that most people mean well when they offer advice, I just believe there is a better way.
Someone finally mentioned something I have been saying about SSA for years now…in that Vortex vid on “Catholic and Homosexual.” It boils down to no non-homosexual person has any clue as to what it feels like to be a homosexual person. This is true. I have SSA and I despise it with every fiber of my being. Why? Because I see it as a poison that affects every single aspect of my life. Why? Because of the underlying causes…low self-esteem, poor body image, lack of self-confidence, etc. If I don’t believe in myself, am I going to apply myself in any aspect of my life? No…why should I? It’ll all turn out bad anyway. For me, those are the things that conspire, along with a somewhat unhappy, lonely childhood, to have made me the SSA underachiever genius (yes, I’m practically a genius) that I am today. I should give up on changing those underlying issues (which, in turn have started to reorient me sexually) and just accept that I’m destined to be an SSA underachiever genius for the rest of my life? Seriously?
Every, single human being’s sexuality will, at some point or another in their lives, be a cross to bear. For someone dealing with a homosexual orientation, that cross can be more “all-encompassing”, if you will. A person with a homosexual orientation isn’t offered a healthy or “non-sinful” outlet to the PHYSICAL aspect of their sexuality. I believe true help and healing can only come by looking at what someone with a homosexual orientation IS offered. That, I believe, is the key.
That sounds almost…deterministic. “Well, you turned out that way, so live with it. It’s your cross, so just deal…”
Every cross should be embraced. If all we do is tell someone that they must change their cross or that the very cross itself is disordered, we help to turn what could be a redemptive cross into a suffocating curse. It’s as if we say, “You shouldn’t even carry that cross because it’s so ugly.”
How in the world can SSA be redemptive in any way whatsoever?
We must be able to face the undeniable fact that for many (SO very many), their homosexual orientation does not go away with counseling and prayer. We have got to ask ourselves, “What then?” Can we encourage someone to embrace even THAT cross?
For those who have that as their cross, then I don’t know what to say. The Church gives little to no options in terms of vocations…it’s all about “no” for homosexual persons.
I pray every day that God will make me exactly the man he wants me to be. If that man happens to be SSA, I’m okay with that. In fact, I will embrace that because I know that the most passionate, loving, beautiful love in the history of the world had nothing to do with sex and everything to do with a cross. THAT love, I will never be denied. What I will ask myself (and God), and what I would ask anyone with SSA to ask themselves is this: In what way can I offer the love my soul wants so badly to offer? How can I give of myself while I embrace this cross?
I pray you are given a better cross than SSA. Believe me, the humiliation of having to make up a lie when people ask you why you’re still single at 38 is not something I would wish on anyone…and that’s an easy one. Try the deep, desperate feeling of loneliness and despair that occasionally grips the heart of those with SSA…knowing that they’ll never, ever have a life companion and are destined to be alone forever.
It’s not a matter of what I can’t do, or what I’m not allowed to do. It’s a matter of what I CAN do, how I CAN share my love. If you ask God to help you love, He simply cannot leave that prayer unanswered because He IS love. God loves you and He loves me. God even loves my sexuality. Why? Because it is a gift I CAN offer to Him.
Peace,
Kolbe
Except everything for the SSA person is NO. No priesthood, no marriage, no life companion, no vocation (except to work…oh, :rolleyes: joy)…no social life (all the people your age are married and altogether far too busy for a loser like one, except for the pity invitation to Easter dinner or something), no nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top