Christian response to Islam

  • Thread starter Thread starter phoage
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
My interpretation is that Islamic refugees will one day takeover the Vatican. At that time, the one-world religion of the Anti-Christ will be ushered in. It will be the new sensation of hybridization of Islam and Christianity…Chrislam.
My interpretation is that the Jewish Temple will be rebuilt and sacrifices re-instituted under the final Anti-Christ. The plans are already in the making, as there are among the Jews, people tracing their ancestry to the Levitical Priesthood, while others are re-creating the temple vessels needed for the sacrifices for use when the Temple is rebuilt. In the current situation it seems impossibly far-fetched, yet there it is. Hard to say how Islam would react.
 
Your post makes no sense. If a hybrid Christian/Islam religion is instilled by the anti-christ then surely we will be in trouble. It will come.
Hi!

…slowdown a little… take a look at the unfolding; the anti-Christ will force Believers to choose him over Christ… he will not guise himself as a prophet of Christ to institute a hybrid faith-base, but will usurp Christ’s Authority and in deed present himself as Christ:
23 ‘If anyone says to you then, “Look, here is the Christ” or, “He is there”, do not believe it; 24 for false Christs and false prophets will arise and produce great signs and portents, enough to deceive even the chosen, if that were possible.
(St. Matthew 24:23-24)

12 This second beast was servant to the first beast, and extended its authority everywhere, making the world and all its people worship the first beast, which had had the fatal wound and had been healed. (Apocalypse 13:12)
The Beast emulates God’s Holy Trinity but it does not seek a mesh of believers; rather it will demand what Yahweh God Demands: One God, One Faith, One Body.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
…instead of saying it’s Church Doctrine, could you demonstrate through actual citing of text (i.e.: “Jesus wept;” John 11:35 vs. it says so in Romans 1:19)?
Don’t think we can get more authoritative than this?

DECLARATION ON THE RELATION OF THE CHURCH TO NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS said:
3. The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their desserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.
Since in the course of centuries not a few quarrels and hostilities have arisen between Christians and Moslems, this sacred synod urges all to forget the past and to work sincerely for mutual understanding and to preserve as well as to promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral welfare, as well as peace and freedom.
 
I have a serious question about how a Catholic should deal with Islam.
Hi Patrick, your question here seems to be about how to deal with Islam but in your post you mentioned only Muslims. There is a difference here.

(1) The difference between Islam and Muslims is very much similar to the difference between Christianity and Christians. As Gandhi once said ‘I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.’ Just as we would not want the worst excesses of Christians to reflect on other’s view of Christ, neither should we reflect the excesses of Muslims onto Islam itself.

(2) You mentioned a strict reading of the Quran but then just as in Christianity where very few of us are Biblical literalists, most Muslims do not take a strict reading of the Quran. It is normally tempered with a dose of common sense but even this is dependent on the cultural norms. Most of the issues you mention are really issues of culture rather than theology. Yes, the cultural norms are justified using the Quran but then so were many of the excesses of Christians in the recent past - slavery, segregation, apartheid were all justified using the Bible.

(3) As in the Bible, the Quran also have many different verses, some of which seemingly are in opposition. For every Quranic quotation not to befriend Christians and Jews, there are another Quranic quote exalting Christians and Jews. So, I think it is futile for any Christian (or ISIS for that matter) to point to any Quranic verse in isolation and say this is what Islam is like. One can do the same with the Bible as well and be just as equally misleading.

(4) Much of the problems of Muslims stem from a lack of development and education among Muslims. One can of course point to this as evidence that this is the natural state of a backward religion. That would be to ignore the fact that the Islamic world was once far more progressive and richer than the Christian West. (of course there is many factors in play at that time as it is now) Muslims also contend that their ‘backwardness’ is a product of Western policies which enriched the West at the cost of Muslims. I am not stating who is right or wrong, but merely pointing out that the argument is much more complex than what many people think.

Ultimately, I think you have brought the right factors into consideration, much more than many of those who provided simplistic answers in their posts replying to you. I believe your analysis of the situation is in the right direction - that most Muslims reject ISIS; that the mess we are in today is also the fault of Western policies; that most Muslims in US and the West seek integration. So most of those who answered really did not advance your thinking at all.

I also believe that the Christian considerations have been correctly identified: Your quotation from Mt etc. No one ever said being a Christian is easy. We are all called to turn the other cheek (ie., after another bombing). We are all called to open our homes to strangers (ie., the refugee). Jesus made clear that we are to do the right thing in spite of the personal risks to ourselves (the Good Samaritan stopped and helped a Jew in a dangerous place - no stretch of imagination to think that he can be robbed himself; or got conned or got blamed by his hated Jews, etc etc).

Yet, it is only human to seek to protect oneself. Sometimes in our limitations, it would seem to be a either-or kind of balancing act. We all can’t be like Maximilian Kolbe, can we. Or can we? If I end up protecting myself at cost of compromising even one of Jesus’ many injunctions of ignoring my personal risks, then I have probably failed no matter how understandable it is. I have to lift up my failure to turn the other cheek to Jesus and ask for forgiveness. it is tough - which is why I often pray that if I were to be called to my martyrdom, I would go with a lot of courage than I can muster today.

So, Patrick, I think you are on the right track but it is a personal decision each one of us has to make in each situation where we are called to balance off self-preservation with the call of Jesus. At least you are aware of it.

As for the understanding of Islam itself, feel free if you wish to seek confirmation of your understanding. I live in a Muslim majority country subject to the edicts of some power-preserving Muslims leaders who use religion for their purposes. So we know Islam quite well and how it is abused by some Muslims but we also know the good of Islam in our good Muslim friends. I also belong to a Christian community here whose churches have been bombed and yet our leaders (Catholic and Protestants) have risen above it all and publicly forgave those who bombed us but still standing firm in our religious rights. Those public forgiveness made me so proud to be a Christian. So can I say that we have been a Church who have suffered more than the Church in America yet have preserved the love and compassion of Jesus in the eyes of the wider society.
 
Don’t think we can get more authoritative than this?
Hi, Jim!

…are you aware that that declaration was made right around the time that Israel became a state/nation?

The reality of the Church is that she seeks to Unite the Body of Christ; her efforts are geared towards peace and unity.

The reality of Islam is quite different:
The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called ‘hypocrites’ and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter. (thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx
)
The say that the road to hell is paved with good intentions… I think that it cuts both ways… the road to extinction is paved with good intentions, as well!

Should we imitate the ostrich and hide our heads in holes in the ground?

I am not condoning violence nor calling people to war or terrorism… but the truth is that Islam has taken great strides to remain silent as terror, death, and destruction has been unleashed throughout the world in the name of their god and religion.

While the Church uses a call to peace, forgiveness and understanding as a means to sanitize the world, Islam calls for violence, treachery, and outright extermination as means to sanitize the world.

No matter how much “goodwill” is spent on seeking peace and understanding, those who revel in violence, terror, death, and destruction will not yield their mechanisms just to gather around the fire and sing: “Kum ba yah.”

Maran atha!

Angel
 
jimkhong,
I must say that that was one of the most understanding responses I have every heard, and you did a wonderful job explaining the situation.

But … (their is always a “but”) … we also have responsibilities to our family and our communities. And I feel very very obligated, in the name of goodness, to not take steps so that what has happened to you and the christians in your area does not happen to me and mine. As you yourself said, it did happen to you. And we keep getting the same feedback from everyone else who tries to share a living area with them. Now if they are Isam but not Muslim … ok.

I know what I sound like to you … a hate monger. But that isn’t what this is about. It is sincere fear for my fellow brother/sister Catholics and all the other christians around me, beside all the other fellow Americans.

It seems to be always a circular pattern … the nice Muslims come … then the Mosques are built usually by the Brotherhood … then the Sunite teacher enters the Mosque and teaches young men … then the young men work on the nice Muslims … then the nice muslims give in to the not-so-nice Muslims and Shiara Law begins … and then Muslim community begins to seek high political positions … then the laws begin to change in their favor … and then you can fill in the boxes from here out.

billionbibles.org/sharia/hitler-muslim-brotherhood.html

Everywhere I look it is the same … starts out in simplicy and innocence … but it doesn’t end that way … as in your case. In fact in your situation you just proved to me what I have been saying is correct.

I believe we are suppose to do what we can with our intellect and then leave the rest up to God and not the reverse. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. And God love all the Muslims and may they be happy where ever they are because they really do not mesh with our traditional laws or culture. Nothing satisfies them with less than forcing their culture on our society time after time.

Now I do like some of the ideas of the Muslims … like doing away with Hollywood, what a blessing that would be. Or prayer 6 times a day. But most of their living ideas are not good for the west.

I would like to finish by saying it would be a blessing for me to be a martyr, rather then I, and my family, being forced to live under their culture, without a Catholic church, with no freedom to express my love and faith in Jesus Christ openly, and to be looked upon and treated as a second class citizen that is going to hell, and so on. No thank you.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=1036307
It hurts me to say this, but I believe that most Christians are going to Hell because of what the Qur’an says in surah 5:17: “They have certainly disbelieved who say that Allah is Christ, the son of Mary…” As I said before, I don’t want Christians to go to Hell, but I do believe that most of them will.
But … I do want to say … that was a marvelous post. And I do want you to know, I do not have any hard feelings toward Muslims, and I wish them all the happiness in the world right where they are at.

Here is a story of one Christian and her country by being open and wellcoming to the needy Muslims.

Brigitte Gabriel Exposes Muslim Brotherhood Plan To Destroy America
youtube.com/watch?v=PFO1AtjoUoo

By the way, in the next Post, St. Thomas’ thoughts are presented about Muhammed.
St. Thomas is a doctor of our Church and one of the greatest.
 
Thomas Aquinas:

"He (Mohammed) seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh urges us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected; he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity.

He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the Contrary, Mohammed said that he was sent in the power of his arms - which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants. What is more, no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning (1). Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Mohammed forced others to become his follower’s by the violence of his arms. Nor do divine pronouncements on part of preceding prophets offer him any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimony of the Old and the New Testaments by making them into a fabrication of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place faith in his words believe foolishly."
  • Summa Contra Gentiles, Book 1, Chapter 16, Art. 4. Footnote: 1. Sura 21:5, Sura 44:14; Sura 16:103, Sura 37:36
 
I know what I sound like to you … a hate monger. But that isn’t what this is about. It is sincere fear for my fellow brother/sister Catholics and all the other christians around me, beside all the other fellow Americans.
No I do not see you guys as hate mongers and I do believe the fear is sincere. It is understandable to seek the protect oneself and those we love, even if it is at the cost compromising what the Gospel teaches. I can’t speak for Jesus but I would rather think that he will forgive us for doing so, starting with me I hope. Of course America being the large country it is, harbours some racist hate mongers (to use your term) but I do not believe they are in this forum. It remains a minority; vocal yes but a minority nevertheless.

I think you fred, you have also given it some thought and do realise Muslims are not monolithic. The Shiites are religiously more tolerant despite the Iranians’ ‘death to America’ chants. This is by and large a political protest rather than theological although Muslims often do not differentiate the two (political & religious) but we do. Shiites are largely Iranians and even those non-Iranians tend to support Iranian foreign policy and will therefore oppose the US in a similar fashion.

The most tolerant group are the Sufis who lead many inter-religious dialogues with non-Muslims. Ironically and unfortunately they became target of much vitriol from Americans who cannot differentiate between different Muslims groups for seeking to build their mosque near Ground Zero in NYC.

Even the Sunnis are not monolithic. The danger has been the spread of Saudi money since the 80s. Flushed with oil money and in competition with the Iranians, the Saudis funded mosque building all over the world. The rivalry is theological (Sunni vs Shiites), political (leadership of the Muslim world) and ethnic (Arab vs Farsi) and has been running since pre-Islamic times.

The Saudis are Wahabists, an 18th innovation in Islam, with a literalist theology. They basically have a lot in common with Christian evangelists with similar literalist views of scriptures. The Saudis not just funded building of mosques but also the clergy who man them. So, the Saudi Wahabist view of Islam spread throughout the world. That is why many Westerns equate Islam with a literalist view and strict enforcement of the hudud. Hudud is that part of the shariah dealing with criminal law - public whipping, chopping of hands and all that. Normally when we say Syariah, we do not include the hudud and limit shariah law only to law on family and inheritance - relatively benign law which most do not have any objection for it to apply to Muslims provided it comply with the constitution.

More damaging is the spread of Wahabist views among the historically religiously-tolerant Muslim nations. Not just are Wahabists opposing other religions but also other views of Islam. Muslims who do not agree with them are condemned, sometimes as non-Muslim infidels ISIS are basically Wahabists (alternatively also called Salafists - same sect just that Wahabists tend to refer to those in Saudi Arabia) and they differ from mainstream Wahabists only in enforcement and action.

(Continue next post)
 
(Continued)

The problem encountered in Europe is a failure to integrate Muslims. This was originally due to a respect for pluralism in a multi-cultural society - some may say a misplaced respect. There are different models of integration in Europe: German (basically non-integration as most non-Germans do not get citizenship but are allowed to stay and work), French (ignore the minority groups and publicly treat everyone as secular French), British (everyone retain their identity within a British way of life). Many Europeans have now realised that their models of integration are not working. The sense of alienation coming from a lack of economic well-being merely led some to radicalisation. The Dutch has rejected their integration model (similar to the British) and is seeking to insist on Dutch values while the Scandinavians are moving faster to identify factors behind radicalisation and deal with them within the Muslim communities.

Muslims have been taught from young that their religion is a total way of life and is the best among all religions. But when they grow up they see the unavoidable conclusion that Muslims lag behind other religious groups and some respond by blaming others. This is just an example of a cultural factor leading to radicalisation. There are many other factors, many purely cultural, some stemming from the way Islam is organised/practiced and a few from the religion itself. And these factors sometimes differ with the host country.

The American model of integration has been rather more robust as the American identity takes precedence over any ethnic-religious origins one might have. The problem is not so much Americans who became Muslims but rather Muslims who become Americans. It is important that Muslims who did not grow up with American values can be Americanised or at least their children will be. By Americanised, I mean imbued with American values of tolerance, democratic decision-making, separation of church & state, etc. But what will you do with those who cannot or refused to be Americanised and find themselves on the wrong side of the socio-economic dice? Are the tools of the past still relevant? I don’t know but it is an answer Americans must decide where their values lead them.
In fact in your situation you just proved to me what I have been saying is correct.
There is a difference. In my country Christians are a minority but Muslims are an even smaller minority in US. There is a lot you can do and do not underestimate the power of the American dream, American values, America as an ideal. America has always been aspirational to the rest of the world. A Green card is still more valuable than a Platinum card. People still wants to come to America because of their dreams for their children. You just have to make sure that they are willing to give up that part of their identity incompatible with that dream. They must become American-Muslims: Americans who happen to be Muslims, not Muslims who happen to have a right to work in America.

We have our own model of integration in my own country but it got hijacked by corrupt political powers. Muslims in my country are instinctively tolerant but get confused or fearful when Saudi-influenced religious authorities tell them otherwise. A generation of political conditioning and education have also eroded our tradition of tolerance. But now broader minded Muslims in Malaysia and Indonesia are organising themselves to oppose the Wahabist thinking. I have faith in human nature and in the Holy Spirit and the night will pass. We just have to endure because as they say, the night is always the darkest before the dawn.

You are right fred to place your trust in the Holy Spirit but we only do that after doing all that we can. The question is what do you do up to that point: How do you imbue migrant Muslims with American values without betraying the symbolism of the Statue of Liberty and our common Gospel values?
 
(Continued)

The problem encountered in Europe is a failure to integrate Muslims. This was originally due to a respect for pluralism in a multi-cultural society - some may say a misplaced respect… British (everyone retain their identity within a British way of life)… while the Scandinavians are moving faster to identify factors behind radicalisation and deal with them within the Muslim communities.

Muslims have been taught from young that their religion is a total way of life and is the best among all religions. But when they grow up they see the unavoidable conclusion that Muslims lag behind other religious groups and some respond by blaming others. This is just an example of a cultural factor leading to radicalisation. There are many other factors, many purely cultural, some stemming from the way Islam is organised/practiced and a few from the religion itself. And these factors sometimes differ with the host country.

The American model of integration has been rather more robust as the American identity takes precedence over any ethnic-religious origins one might have. The problem is not so much Americans who became Muslims but rather Muslims who become Americans. It is important that Muslims who did not grow up with American values can be Americanised or at least their children will be. By Americanised, I mean imbued with American values of tolerance, democratic decision-making, separation of church & state, etc. But what will you do with those who cannot or refused to be Americanised and find themselves on the wrong side of the socio-economic dice? Are the tools of the past still relevant? I don’t know but it is an answer Americans must decide where their values lead them.

There is a difference. In my country Christians are a minority but Muslims are an even smaller minority in US. There is a lot you can do and do not underestimate the power of the American dream… A Green card is still more valuable than a Platinum card. People still wants to come to America because of their dreams for their children. You just have to make sure that they are willing to give up that part of their identity incompatible with that dream. They must become American-Muslims: Americans who happen to be Muslims, not Muslims who happen to have a right to work in America.

We have our own model of integration in my own country but it got hijacked by corrupt political powers. Muslims in my country are instinctively tolerant but get confused or fearful when Saudi-influenced religious authorities tell them otherwise. A generation of political conditioning and education have also eroded our tradition of tolerance. But now broader minded Muslims in Malaysia and Indonesia are organising themselves to oppose the Wahabist thinking. I have faith in human nature and in the Holy Spirit and the night will pass. We just have to endure because as they say, the night is always the darkest before the dawn.

You are right fred to place your trust in the Holy Spirit but we only do that after doing all that we can. The question is what do you do up to that point: How do you imbue migrant Muslims with American values without betraying the symbolism of the Statue of Liberty and our common Gospel values?
Hi, Jim!

Clearly you have a greater exposure and understanding of the Muslim mind than most (at least me) on this side of the boarder (ocean)…

It also seems that you have a stronger conviction (or at least willingness) to follow Christ’s Word and to Stand even if it means facing threats, oppression and even death… living in a culture that has not mobilized towards the extinction of Christians makes us here in the US… well, soft Christians…

But do you truly believe that Christ’s Call is that Christians should face extinction rather than to fight against extermination?

Saddam Hussein was a terrible despot, yet the second his iron grip was removed from the neck of the people Muslims raised themselves against Christians and other Muslims… and while Muslims do come under the exploitation of other Muslims, Christians suffer the greatest horrors from rape and enslavement to extermination.

Saddest thing is that the “good” and “tolerant” Muslim majority remains indifferent to the Christian plight–don’t get me wrong the West is just as indignant and as apathetic, save those Christian agents that have been mobilizing to help and pray for their fellow Brothers and Sisters.

While it does take two to tango… it seems to me that Muslims have been reluctant to give up the “anger” part of their cultural experience when they migrate into a “new” world. Just about a decade ago a news program televised a documentary that explored the Muslim integration in N. America:
  • young men and women calling the nine eleven terrorists “martyrs”
  • young women, being more vocal (I think no one expected them to be so open), not only supported these “martyrs” but spoke as being proud to become the next “martyrs”
  • these same young women (the young men were more diplomatic–almost silent) spoke of “death” to the infidels (favorite target, Jews; next, Americans)
  • The report was cut and the new taping/recording now presented a softer more allegorical take
  • During the same program a segment displayed the inculcation of Muslim values which included training elementary-age children to give death to the infidels and the discovery of an elementary school text that teaches, amongst other things, that male Muslims are worth two non-Muslims.
Basically, mosques in America being used to train Muslims to hate and kill infidels–which includes, Americans!

Could you not see the fear of allowing a mosque to be built near Ground Zero?

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Could you not see the fear of allowing a mosque to be built near Ground Zero?
Of course I can see your fear. But then didn’t John tell us the love drives out fear?

Each one of us has to decide how much we intend the Gospel to guide our actions. I cannot speak for you, only for myself. You make your own choice and it is not me you need to justify your decision to. There is a time and place for that. I too have to justify my own myself and that too is not to you.
 
Of course I can see your fear. But then didn’t John tell us the love drives out fear?

Each one of us has to decide how much we intend the Gospel to guide our actions. I cannot speak for you, only for myself. You make your own choice and it is not me you need to justify your decision to. There is a time and place for that. I too have to justify my own myself and that too is not to you.
Hi, Jim!

…when I speak of fear I mean that as in the causality of life.

As you’ve pointed out “tolerant/peaceful” Muslims came into your country… soon followed by not so “tolerant” Muslims…

Given the Muslim experience (their world conquest bent) putting a mosque on top of a previous “holy” ground is one of their “conquest” tells (mark)… would that not become a magnet/symbol and signal to encourage the not so “tolerant” Muslim that America has in deed been conquered and would that not embolden them to commit to larger and more consistent “foot-on-the-ground” deployment?

Yes, we are Called to peace and Love… but do you truly believe that nazis, and others such as them, left to their own device, would simply yield to Love and understanding?

Consider the fact that when brought to Jesus, Jesus did not demand that the Roman centurion cease being a military officer in order for Him to heal his servant.

While we are Called into the radical theology of Love, I doubt that those around us would accept “peace” and “Love” as the currency to end their hostilities.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Yes, we are Called to peace and Love… but do you truly believe that nazis, and others such as them, left to their own device, would simply yield to Love and understanding?
No but then I am not answerable for how the Nazi respond to God. Or for the response of ISIS or anyone who persecute me, for that matter. Any more than the early Christians were answerable for those who threw them to the lions. I am only answerable to how I respond to God’s invitation to love and to a much smaller extent for my family and those close to me.

I am also not answerable for your response. My responsibility ends with my passing on the message of Jesus and if necessary persuade to the extent of the persuasive abilities God has given me. So, really it is not necessary to justify to me your response.

If you choose to accept the call to peace and love (your words) in words but not in action that is how you choose to respond. I am not in the position to say you are right or wrong. That reckoning is by someone else in another time and another place. And I really do not know what the judgement will be any more than I know what the judgement on my decision will be. I can only respond to God’s invitation in the way he led to me understand it.
But do you truly believe that Christ’s Call is that Christians should face extinction rather than to fight against extermination?
The reason why I am a Christian today is because some two millennia ago, bands of my ancestors in faith chose extinction with full trust in God rather than compromise the injunctions of Jesus and fight against extermination. Had those brave souls gave in to the fear that drives out God’s love in them, then there is no reason for any of us to be Christians today. And from the watering of their blood sprang the tree that became the Church under which we all shelter today. But should someone else come along and cut it down - burn every single chapel, seize every single school, profane every single altar - it does nothing more than bring us back to those days when we had nothing but our dependence on God.

I am not advocating that only a hermit with no worldly attachment can be a true Christian. All I am saying is that nobody wants to be persecuted and nobody wants to live in fear. But if we were to be in that situation, the history of the Church tells us that the only legacy to leave behind is the stories of steadfastness to Gospel values. No matter the persecution, the Church survives, be it communist Poland, shogun Japan, or pagan Rome.

Still I do not think the Church in America is anywhere near to such persecution. And let us not ask for her to undergo such persecution. The choice is the way of the world or the way of Christ. The way of the world is easy and tempting, but those who live by the sword will die by the sword, or whatever other implement contrary to the Gospels one may choose to use. The way of the Church could mean integrating Muslims into the American way of life just as the Church in times past integrated pagans into the Church. The Viking terror did not end in their defeat in a world-ending conflagration but in their baptism. I believe the jidadhist threat to America will not end with the expulsion of Muslims from the US but rather when their children one day make their daily pledge to the flag with sincere American values in their hearts.
 
No but then I am not answerable for how the Nazi respond to God. Or for the response of ISIS or anyone who persecute me, for that matter. Any more than the early Christians were answerable for those who threw them to the lions. I am only answerable to how I respond to God’s invitation to love and to a much smaller extent for my family and those close to me.

I am also not answerable for your response. My responsibility ends with my passing on the message of Jesus and if necessary persuade to the extent of the persuasive abilities God has given me. So, really it is not necessary to justify to me your response.

If you choose to accept the call to peace and love (your words) in words but not in action that is how you choose to respond. I am not in the position to say you are right or wrong. That reckoning is by someone else in another time and another place. And I really do not know what the judgement will be any more than I know what the judgement on my decision will be. I can only respond to God’s invitation in the way he led to me understand it.

The reason why I am a Christian today is because some two millennia ago, bands of my ancestors in faith chose extinction with full trust in God rather than compromise the injunctions of Jesus and fight against extermination. Had those brave souls gave in to the fear that drives out God’s love in them, then there is no reason for any of us to be Christians today. And from the watering of their blood sprang the tree that became the Church under which we all shelter today. But should someone else come along and cut it down - burn every single chapel, seize every single school, profane every single altar - it does nothing more than bring us back to those days when we had nothing but our dependence on God.

I am not advocating that only a hermit with no worldly attachment can be a true Christian. All I am saying is that nobody wants to be persecuted and nobody wants to live in fear. But if we were to be in that situation, the history of the Church tells us that the only legacy to leave behind is the stories of steadfastness to Gospel values. No matter the persecution, the Church survives, be it communist Poland, shogun Japan, or pagan Rome.

Still I do not think the Church in America is anywhere near to such persecution. And let us not ask for her to undergo such persecution. The choice is the way of the world or the way of Christ. The way of the world is easy and tempting, but those who live by the sword will die by the sword, or whatever other implement contrary to the Gospels one may choose to use. The way of the Church could mean integrating Muslims into the American way of life just as the Church in times past integrated pagans into the Church. The Viking terror did not end in their defeat in a world-ending conflagration but in their baptism. I believe the jidadhist threat to America will not end with the expulsion of Muslims from the US but rather when their children one day make their daily pledge to the flag with sincere American values in their hearts.
Hi, Jim!

I think we’ve (at least, I) exhausted this tangent.

Thank you for your thoughts.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Originally posted by jimkhong
The reason why I am a Christian today is because some two millennia ago, bands of my ancestors in faith chose extinction with full trust in God rather than compromise the injunctions of Jesus and fight against extermination. Had those brave souls gave in to the fear that drives out God’s love in them, then there is no reason for any of us to be Christians today.
Jim, in the days of early Christianity one Emperor outlawed Christians, and the next Emperor let them be. It was an off and on situation. The Christians did not have part in how things would be run in the world, but rather were run by the world.

Toay, we live in America, and we pray for religious liberty for all. That is what should have been done from the beginning. Now we have the chance and choice to protect that liberty for all since we live in a country that gives us a choice. And if we see a real danger threatening that liberty, then we should pray and work to keep it. The early Christians did not have that chance or choice. Not until Constintine who gave religious liberty to all religions. And I might mention, which our history books don’t do, that there were a ton of Christians who weren’t faithful as well. Maybe the weak Christian would have survived in a society where religious liberty prevailed. The whole story is about the sinners too, the smoldering wicks.

I’m thinking of the KKK who started just with a handful, and like the proverbial snowball rolling down hill, just got bigger and bigger. It starts from the inside and grows by putting pressure on others. Lenin was the same, so small in the beginning.
And this is exemplified by the 12 apostles who also started small.

I really do admire your courage and your faith and it is nice to hear from someone so loving. And I’m sure your kindness will do much good. Maybe it boils down to the need of the “good” cop and the “bad” cop.
 
Thanks for your kind words, fred. I am not sure if I am that loving or which cop I am. Sometimes I really don’t know. In my country I do have a ministry to catechise our youths who are exposed to Muslim conversion. We explain to them the differences between Islam and Christianity in apologetics courses. In explaining the truth about Islamic theology and Muslim thinking I sometimes have to worry at which point I overstep the line into Islamophobia.

Before I studied Islam, I used to think that it is just an accident of birth that I am not Muslim but I now realise that being Muslim (as is currently being taught) is incompatible with the values I currently hold. It is clear that some cultural values underpinning the way Muslims practice their religion in some countries creates vulnerabilities exploitable by jihadists.

Those same cultural values will make those same Muslim communities resistant to integration into American society and way of life. Some Muslim communities are already integrated but I would expect some of the more resistant migrant communities to take many generations or maybe centuries to integrate.

I will pray for America and invite you to pray too for our youths to be protected by the Holy Spirit from Muslim conversions obtained by duress, deception or bribery.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top