N
Neithan
Guest
Again, that’s not a sufficient or reasonable explanation. But that’s beyond this particular thread.
They could both be wrong, or one right -or more right than the other at least. I found the Quran to be quite uninspiring, but that was just me and at a time when I entertained many different religions as being possibly valid and had no dog in the fight in any case.So could any of you mad historians and scientists help me out here with my big question of Jesus or Allah?
How do you explain the apocryphal gospels? They are obviously partly true are they not?That either really happened, or is an incredibly elaborate hoax.
Jehovah’s Witnesses believe Jesus to be a great Prince and Prophet, but not God. Similarly with Muslims. That is hundreds of millions of people denying your dichotomy.either God or a bad man.
Focus on the factual claims. What is it in an apocryphal gospel you’d like to consider? And why? Please be specific.How do you explain the apocryphal gospels? They are obviously partly true are they not?
Sure, you can assert whatever you want to — argumentum ad populum aside. The issue is if there are reasonable grounds. If I claim that Napoleon was actually a metaphor for the sun god Apollo (see Ven. Fulton Sheen above for this comparison) and the historical reports we have were all corrupted, am I giving you reasonable grounds to believe this? Further to the point, if I say that Napoleon really existed but was just a popular officer who taught military strategy, and writings about him became “messy” with elaboration, is that reasonable?Jehovah’s Witnesses believe Jesus to be a great Prince and Prophet, but not God. Similarly with Muslims. That is hundreds of millions of people denying your dichotomy.