Chronic struggle with discontentment

  • Thread starter Thread starter TBenedicta
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
TBenedicta said:

“My baby has been “high needs” since she was born and has a few different allergies and GI issues that mean that she nurses MORE at nine months than she did as a newborn. She doesn’t sleep well, either (it’s getting better as she gets older). So, “attachment parenting” has sort of fallen into my lap as a way to stay somewhat sane.”

What does your pediatrician think the prognosis is on this and have you consulted a pediatric gastroenterologist yet? There may be something that your pediatrician is missing. There’s also a possibility that the baby will do better on a special formula.

It might also just be for the next several months if you’re lucky. I have a cheese and dairy-loving friend whose breastfed baby was horribly allergic to any dairy in her diet to the point that my friend was literally wasting away from deprivation (there’s dairy in EVERYTHING). But then, one fine day, the baby suddenly wasn’t allergic to the dairy and my friend was able to come back to the land of the living.

One more thing–if you are purposely reducing your fertility, that is contraception, even if the method is just adding breastfeeding sessions.
No, purposefully reducing your fertility by continuing to breastfeed is not contraception. Good grief, the lowering of fertility as a result of breastfeeding is an integral part of how the reproductive system works.

If therefore there are well-grounded reasons for spacing births, arising from the physical or psychological condition of husband or wife, or from external circumstances, the Church teaches that married people may then take advantage of the natural cycles immanent in the reproductive system and engage in marital intercourse only during those times that are infertile, thus controlling birth in a way which does not in the least offend the moral principles which We have just explained. –Humanae Vitae

There are places where the grocery stores have not joined the century that recognizes lactose intolerance, but in most places a lactose-intolerant person will not come remotely close to “wasting away”. As noted earlier, the Eastern Orthodox fast from dairy all of the time; it isn’t that hard. This is why so many populations have high lactose intolerance: that is, their adult populations do not ever eat dairy after they are weaned from their mothers. Methinks perhaps your cheese-loving friend decided to be a picky eater.
 
TBenedicta said:

“I find it hard to believe someone “wasted away” simply by not eating dairy! There are so many other healthful foods to choose from-”

Not sleeping, having an emotionally needy older special needs child, severe hormonal issues from the breastfeeding that caused a lot of emotional and psychological issues, and having a husband that works long hours all probably made their contribution. She was going into some sort of hyper-lactational amenorrhea that really messed with her head. She was truly wasting away–but you’re right that it wasn’t just diet, but diet was part of it. I’ve seen cancer patients who looked way better. Once she was able to eat dairy again and able to just eat stuff without thinking about what was in it and her baby started sleeping better, things got better very quickly.

Do your Eastern Catholic relatives really require that pregnant and nursing mothers drop dairy for long fasts? Because that sounds like a medically very dangerous plan.

Come to think of it, are you yourself having any unusual symptoms? You may be focusing so much on your baby that you are missing some red flags with regard to your own health. Could you have postpartum depression or some other physical issue?

“It is patently false. Ecological breastfeeding falls under the scope of Natural Family Planning, and also God’s design for women to give of themselves through nursing their children with their own bodies.”

If you are nursing to feed and care for your baby, that’s obviously fine. If you are doing extra nursing with the intention of inducing infertility, that is contraception. It doesn’t matter if the means are “natural” if the end is to lessen fertility. If you post that on the moral theology forum, that’s exactly what they will tell you.
 
The intent is very important for moral reasoning. If you have a hysterectomy or take hormonal birth control in order to be infertile, that would be contraceptive, while if you have a hysterectomy or take hormonal birth control to treat a medical problem, that is OK. Just because breastfeeding is “natural,” that does not make it legitimate to intentionally produce infertility via breastfeeding, for instance by nursing on a particular schedule. However, if feeding your baby is your intention, and infertility is simply an accidental by-product of feeding your baby (rather than one you are intentionally pursuing), that is quite all right.

I am married to a Catholic ethicist, although not specifically a medical ethicist. He finds some of the Kippleys’ stuff about ecological breastfeeding very morally problematic.
 
EasterJoy said:

“There are places where the grocery stores have not joined the century that recognizes lactose intolerance, but in most places a lactose-intolerant person will not come remotely close to “wasting away”.”

As I said, it was one of several really bad factors. She was having to avoid pretty much all baked goods she didn’t make herself, as hidden dairy was causing a lot of problems. One ill-considered cookie would cause the baby 12 hours of tummy problems and sleeplessness for her. Just having to be that careful about everything she ate probably made her a little nuts, without counting the hormonal effects of the extreme amenorrhea, caring for a special needs older child with his own behavioral and dietary quirks (i.e. eating next to nothing), etc.

I don’t think that Eastern Catholics are a good example because 1) they almost certainly have exceptions for pregnant women and nursing mothers and 2) I bet they generally don’t worry that hard about trace amounts of dairy (any more than we have to worry during Lent about the fact that jello is technically an animal product).
 
We’ve strayed a bit from topic. Anyway, my point is that your baby’s sensitivities could be contributing to a lack of well-being on your part, and that you need just as much TLC as your baby does. There’s a possible virtuous circle here, where the better the baby feels, the better you will feel, and the happier you are, the happier the baby will be (this will be particularly true once the baby gets just a little older), etc. So, if you can improve either your well-being and happiness or your baby’s well-being and happiness, there may be a chain reaction where things suddenly get better and better.

It would be really sad if your husband’s being in medical school meant that you and your baby were medically neglected.

Oh, and to your original post, I have to add that babies of the same mother can differ considerably. For instance, my first two babies were both unable to nurse and one spat up a fair bit, and the second was very refluxy and colicky. Fast forward to our third baby, who is some sort of breastfeeding genius (she taught me everything I know, starting from her first hours), and who spat up at most maybe once a month. Up until this baby, I believed that spitting up was just what babies do, but I’m now realizing that that isn’t the case at all.

The fact that this baby is very needy does not mean that all of your future babies will be equally needy.
 
The intent is very important for moral reasoning. If you have a hysterectomy or take hormonal birth control in order to be infertile, that would be contraceptive, while if you have a hysterectomy or take hormonal birth control to treat a medical problem, that is OK. Just because breastfeeding is “natural,” that does not make it legitimate to intentionally produce infertility via breastfeeding, for instance by nursing on a particular schedule. However, if feeding your baby is your intention, and infertility is simply an accidental by-product of feeding your baby (rather than one you are intentionally pursuing), that is quite all right.

I am married to a Catholic ethicist, although not specifically a medical ethicist. He finds some of the Kippleys’ stuff about ecological breastfeeding very morally problematic.
If a person were to express her milk and throw it away because her intention was to lower her fertility instead of to feed a baby, I suppose you’d have a point. There is nothing wrong, however, with letting our bodies work precisely as our bodies were meant to work. That breastfeeding itself lowers fertility is obviously according to the divine plan. Let her be.
 
Easter Joy said:

“If a person were to express her milk and throw it away because her intention was to lower her fertility instead of to feed a baby, I suppose you’d have a point. There is nothing wrong, however, with letting our bodies work precisely as our bodies were meant to work. That breastfeeding itself lowers fertility is obviously according to the divine plan. Let her be.”
  1. Some of the LAM stuff takes this further than is morally acceptable. Consider, for example the “rule” that I keep hearing that says that the baby can’t sleep longer than six hours at night for LAM, which means that LAM mothers are (in some cases) waking babies up on purposes to feed, just to prevent the return of fertility. Here’s a recent thread from CA, entitled “waking up child for LAM.”
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=828423

I think that really undercuts the whole idea of “natural mothering” and “being in tune with the baby”, if for the sake of LAM, the mother is feeding a baby that doesn’t really want to be fed.
  1. Then there’s the medical side of this. TBenedicta’s baby has a lot of gastrointestinal stuff going on. Are we totally sure that all this round-the-clock feeding is medically good for this baby? It might, in fact, be the case that the baby is feeding constantly because of being in discomfort, but that the constant feeding is in turn contributing to the discomfort. (I accidentally did that to one of my babies when he was small and colicky–sorry, baby!). Also, chronic disturbed sleep from round-the-clock feedings and co-sleeping may be dragging TBenedicta into postpartum depression.
Of course, TBenedicta may have this totally under control, in which case forget I said it. It doesn’t sound like it’s under control, though.
  1. TBenedicta has expressed a lot of unhappiness with her current situation.
“But I feel so dissatisfied with my life every single day.”

“The reality of this being my life for the next twenty plus years as I keep having babies and supporting my HUSBAND’S dreams is setting in. There is “nothing better” for me.”

Obviously, something is not working. It might very well be that the round-the-clock breastfeeding is bad for her and bad for the baby and I think that deserves investigation, as do other elements of their daily routine. It isn’t kindness to tell her to keep on doing what she’s doing, because what she’s doing isn’t working for her.
 
Then there’s the medical side of this. TBenedicta’s baby has a lot of gastrointestinal stuff going on. Are we totally sure that all this round-the-clock feeding is medically good for this baby? It might, in fact, be the case that the baby is feeding constantly because of being in discomfort, but that the constant feeding is in turn contributing to the discomfort. (I accidentally did that to one of my babies when he was small and colicky–sorry, baby!). Also, chronic disturbed sleep from round-the-clock feedings and co-sleeping may be dragging TBenedicta into postpartum depression.

Obviously, something is not working. It might very well be that the round-the-clock breastfeeding is bad for her and bad for the baby and I think that deserves investigation, as do other elements of their daily routine. It isn’t kindness to tell her to keep on doing what she’s doing, because what she’s doing isn’t working for her.
A couple of points, quickly.

Our expectation as a society has really become distorted… babies NEED their mothers, and it’s not unusual at all in other cultures for babies to feed throughout the night well into his/her first year. The breast is functional in terms of comforting/bonding as well as fulfilling nutritional needs. Even with allergies, breastmilk is the nutritionally superior choice to formula.
This does not mean it is any less difficult to be a present parent throughout the night! No. It’s difficult. But worthwhile. I do not have issues with postpartum depression, but rather spiritual discontent due to my lack of (I think) a servant’s heart and having not been brought up to serve others. I was brought up in a home with a (wonderful!) working mother, so I have no model for what it means to truly cultivate an attitude of joy while providing a stable, happy, healthy Catholic home. None. I also feel very lonely at times, living so far away from family (that is also quite a recent/distorted phenomenon, living away from family). I don’t think I’m unique in that, which is why I asked for help.

Also- just in regards to your friend who couldn’t eat dairy… there are so so so many healthful options to get daily protein/fat. Hummus, avocado, meats (poultry, fish, a bit of red meat or bacon here and there!), nuts (and if nut-free: sunflower seeds and sunflower seed butter). Snacks like popcorn, corn tortilla chips with salsa, cinnamon on sprouted grain toast, apples and a nut/seed butter. Just off the top of my head. I don’t think it was merely a matter of nutrition for your friend. It’s certainly not for me. I’m one of the healthiest eaters I know- and I have no issues reading labels because it’s second nature to me. I grew up doing it as a vegetarian and continued to do so into adulthood because I like to eat minimally processed food and less of the junk.

Anyway, thanks for your thoughts and obvious concern. Blessings to you!
 
Our expectation as a society has really become distorted… babies NEED their mothers, and it’s not unusual at all in other cultures for babies to feed throughout the night well into his/her first year. The breast is functional in terms of comforting/bonding as well as fulfilling nutritional needs. Even with allergies, breastmilk is the nutritionally superior choice to formula.
Breast milk is nature’s way, but high infant mortality is also “nature’s way”, so of course we do not take what is usually the best as always being the best. A child can be allergic or intolerant to her own mother’s breast milk. If that is the case, the child will suffer if that is what the child is fed. If a doctor recommends alternatives that could make the child more comfortable, it is worth considering. That comment is for the record, however. If your child’s pediatrician does not believe breast milk to be your child’s problem, then that doesn’t apply to your situation.
This does not mean it is any less difficult to be a present parent throughout the night! No. It’s difficult. But worthwhile. I do not have issues with postpartum depression, but rather spiritual discontent due to my lack of (I think) a servant’s heart and having not been brought up to serve others. I was brought up in a home with a (wonderful!) working mother, so I have no model for what it means to truly cultivate an attitude of joy while providing a stable, happy, healthy Catholic home. None. I also feel very lonely at times, living so far away from family (that is also quite a recent/distorted phenomenon, living away from family). I don’t think I’m unique in that, which is why I asked for help.
How did the professional who diagnosed you differentiate between depression and discontent, and how did that person conclude that you are not suffering from some amount of both? I am curious to hear how that was explained to you.

My children did not sleep through the night until they were, oh, about five years old. At least one of them always figured out a pretext for a social call in the middle of the night. (I am soft enough to not let them suffer the fate of the boy who cried “wolf!”) IOW, you’re not talking to someone who threw the kids into their cribs and locked the door at night.

Our children’s pediatrician suggested that while I continue to visit the boys at night if I was so inclined, that I gradually feed them less. They had started out low weight, and had become accustomed to eating a lot at night, but at some point, this became more of a habit than a need. Sure enough, when I fed them less, they slept more. As a consequence, I slept more. It turns out that I was a lot easier to get along with when I was not so sleep-deprived.

Having a servant’s heart does not make you into an angel that has no physical limits. You have to pace yourself, you have to take care of yourself. Just as you will learn to set up your child for behavioral success by making certain they have enough rest and nutrition to face social situations with ease, just so you need to set yourself up for success by seeing to your own physical needs. There are times when exhaustion cannot be avoided because of the demands of duty, but that does not mean that there is no duty to avoid exhaustion to the extent it can be avoided! So do look for ways to shoot these rapids straight, instead of with your boat sideways. It is plenty challenging if you do it the “easy way”, you can trust us on that one!! 😃

I think most of us will agree that this is one of the biggest mistakes that new parents make: that is, thinking they are failing their child when they choose an option because it is easy on the parent. Nothing could be further from the truth. If it is hard on you, then you had better come up with some reason for yourself that the hard alternative needs to be chosen over the easier one. Christianity is not an exercise in masochism, and neither is good parenting. Learn to conserve your energy, because that is a habit your child will need you to have developed. Trust me on that one, too!
 
TBenedicta said:

“This does not mean it is any less difficult to be a present parent throughout the night! No. It’s difficult. But worthwhile. I do not have issues with postpartum depression, but rather spiritual discontent due to my lack of (I think) a servant’s heart and having not been brought up to serve others. I was brought up in a home with a (wonderful!) working mother, so I have no model for what it means to truly cultivate an attitude of joy while providing a stable, happy, healthy Catholic home. None. I also feel very lonely at times, living so far away from family (that is also quite a recent/distorted phenomenon, living away from family). I don’t think I’m unique in that, which is why I asked for help.”

I would encourage you to make a life for yourself and invite your baby to join you on your grownup adventures, rather than trying to create a life that revolves around your baby, and wondering why you are bored and unfulfilled. This is a lot easier to get going when you have just one baby, so I would suggest starting now. This wouldn’t be selfishness on your part–it will mean creating a more interesting and stimulating life for your baby as a by-product of creating one for you.

By the way, I really like Penelope Leach’s “Your Baby & Child” for being a very middle-of-the road, reassuring, but very insightful book on child development with really beautiful photographs. She talks about babies your baby’s age as being very challenging.

EasterJoy said:

“There are times when exhaustion cannot be avoided because of the demands of duty, but that does not mean that there is no duty to avoid exhaustion to the extent it can be avoided!”

Right. At the extreme, if one is going to be operating a motor vehicle, being well-rested and as fresh as possible could be the difference between an uneventful morning and inflicting a tragedy upon several families. Even in less dire circumstances, exhaustion makes us crabbier, more emotional, and makes us worse at solving problems that we could easily tackle if we were just more rested.

“I think most of us will agree that this is one of the biggest mistakes that new parents make: that is, thinking they are failing their child when they choose an option because it is easy on the parent. Nothing could be further from the truth. If it is hard on you, then you had better come up with some reason for yourself that the hard alternative needs to be chosen over the easier one. Christianity is not an exercise in masochism, and neither is good parenting. Learn to conserve your energy, because that is a habit your child will need you to have developed. Trust me on that one, too!”

Yes. The fact that something is hard does not mean that it’s the right thing to do.
 
TBenedicta said:

I would encourage you to make a life for yourself and invite your baby to join you on your grownup adventures, rather than trying to create a life that revolves around your baby, and wondering why you are bored and unfulfilled. This is a lot easier to get going when you have just one baby, so I would suggest starting now. This wouldn’t be selfishness on your part–it will mean creating a more interesting and stimulating life for your baby as a by-product of creating one for you.

By the way, I really like Penelope Leach’s “Your Baby & Child” for being a very middle-of-the road, reassuring, but very insightful book on child development with really beautiful photographs. She talks about babies your baby’s age as being very challenging.

EasterJoy said:

“There are times when exhaustion cannot be avoided because of the demands of duty, but that does not mean that there is no duty to avoid exhaustion to the extent it can be avoided!”

Right. At the extreme, if one is going to be operating a motor vehicle, being well-rested and as fresh as possible could be the difference between an uneventful morning and inflicting a tragedy upon several families. Even in less dire circumstances, exhaustion makes us crabbier, more emotional, and makes us worse at solving problems that we could easily tackle if we were just more rested.

“I think most of us will agree that this is one of the biggest mistakes that new parents make: that is, thinking they are failing their child when they choose an option because it is easy on the parent. Nothing could be further from the truth. If it is hard on you, then you had better come up with some reason for yourself that the hard alternative needs to be chosen over the easier one. Christianity is not an exercise in masochism, and neither is good parenting. Learn to conserve your energy, because that is a habit your child will need you to have developed. Trust me on that one, too!”

Yes. The fact that something is hard does not mean that it’s the right thing to do.
Thank you both for your advice! I’m praying on it and taking it to heart.
 
I guess I’m full of stories on this thread, but I have one more. I can really relate to the op because she is where I was, 20 years ago.

At my 2nd Catholic homeschool conference, a speaker was talking about how she had struggled after a move because she was feeling very alone and depressed. She said that she was sitting, drinking her coffee trying to gather the strength to get through the day and she realized…

at this point, my mind filled in that she would say that she got out and started a new homeschool group and a rosary group and life became joyful again. Instead, she said…

"Jesus said, “take up your cross daily, and follow me.”

I was stunned. I didn’t expect to hear this answer. I spent months pondering it. I still struggle with my little crosses DAILY.

OP, this is the time for you to really develop your relationship with Christ and his mother. It’s okay to feel lonely sometimes. Ask God to supply you with what you need. I think He will send you a few very good Catholic friends. Keep your eyes open for those opportunities.

However, don’t make that your focus. Grow in faith. Read solid Catholic books. listen to Catholic audio. Pray.

Hold that baby. And don’t listen to the world telling you what is important. Growing is hard. Being a young mom with a needy baby away from family is hard.

You are doing a wonderful thing in a most wonderful way.

“The world promises you comfort, but you weren’t made for comfort. You were made for greatness.” Pope Benedict XVI
 
Screwtape Letters, #6

MY DEAR WORMWOOD,

I am delighted to hear that your patient’s age and profession make it possible, but by no means certain, that he will be called up for military service.

We want him to be in the maximum uncertainty, so that his mind will be filled with contradictory pictures of the future, every one of which arouses hope or fear. There is nothing like suspense and anxiety for barricading a human’s mind against the Enemy. He wants men to be concerned with what they do; our business is to keep them thinking about what will happen to them.

Your patient will, of course, have picked up the notion that he must submit with patience to the Enemy’s will. What the Enemy means by this is primarily that he should accept with patience the tribulation which has actually been dealt out to him-the present anxiety and suspense. It is about this that he is to say “Thy will be done”, and for the daily task of bearing this that the daily bread will be provided. It is your business to see that the patient never thinks of the present fear as his appointed cross but only of the things he is afraid of.

Let him regard them as his crosses: let him forget that, since they are incompatible, they cannot all happen to him, and let him try to practise fortitude and patience to them all in advance. For real resignation, at the same moment, to a dozen different and hypothetical fates, is almost impossible, and the Enemy does not greatly assist those who are trying to attain it: resignation to present and actual suffering, even where that suffering consists of fear, is far easier and is usually helped by this direct action.

An important spiritual law is here involved. I have explained that you can weaken his prayers by diverting his attention from the Enemy Himself to his own states of mind about the Enemy. On the other hand fear becomes easier to master when the patient’s mind is diverted from the thing feared to the fear itself, considered as a present and undesirable state of his own mind; and when he regards the fear as his appointed cross he will inevitably think of it as a state of mind. One can therefore formulate the general rule; in all activities of mind which favour our cause, encourage the patient to be un-self conscious and to concentrate on the object, but in all activities favourable to the Enemy bend his mind back on itself. Let an insult or a woman’s body so fix his attention outward that he does not reflect “I am now entering into the state called Anger-or the state called Lust”. Contrariwise let the reflection “My feelings are now growing more devout, or more charitable” so fix his attention inward that he no longer looks beyond himself to see our Enemy or his own neighbours.

As regards his more general attitude to the war, you must not rely too much on those feelings of hatred which the humans are so fond of discussing in Christian, or anti-Christian, periodicals. In his anguish, the patient can, of course, be encouraged to revenge himself by some vindictive feelings directed towards the German leaders, and that is good so far as it goes. But it is usually a sort of melodramatic or mythical hatred directed against imaginary scapegoats. He has never met these people in real life-they are lay figures modelled on what he gets from newspapers. The results of such fanciful hatred are often most disappointing, and of all humans the English are in this respect the most deplorable milksops. They are creatures of that miserable sort who loudly proclaim that torture is too good for their enemies and then give tea and cigarettes to the first wounded German pilot who turns up at the back door.

Do what you will, there is going to be some benevolence, as well as some malice, in your patient’s soul. The great thing is to direct the malice to his immediate neighbours whom he meets every day and to thrust his benevolence out to the remote circumference, to people he does not know. The malice thus becomes wholly real and the benevolence largely imaginary. There is no good at all in inflaming his hatred of Germans if, at the same time, a pernicious habit of charity is growing up between him and his mother, his employer, and the man he meets in the train. Think of your man as a series of concentric circles, his will being the innermost, his intellect coming next, and finally his fantasy. You can hardly hope, at once, to exclude from all the circles everything that smells of the Enemy: but you must keep on shoving all the virtues outward till they are finally located in the circle of fantasy, and all the desirable qualities inward into the Will. It is only in so far as they reach the will and are there embodied in habits that the virtues are really fatal to us. (I don’t, of course, mean what the patient mistakes for his will, the conscious fume and fret of resolutions and clenched teeth, but the real centre, what the Enemy calls the Heart.) All sorts of virtues painted in the fantasy or approved by the intellect or even, in some measure, loved and admired, will not keep a man from our Father’s house: indeed they may make him more amusing when he gets there,

Your affectionate uncle
SCREWTAPE
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top