Church denies Communion to autistic boy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ziggy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sometimes it seems as though we just can’t see the obvious. This is not about the child’s disability or his rights. He is not receiving the Euacharist if he is spitting it out. Thank you Christus Rex.
Sometimes it is about ensuring that we take whatever action necessary to ensure that all, even those with disabilites fulfill their role within the church. I am positive that progress could be made on this matter, if the church showed willing, it would be far easier for all parties involved.
 
40.png
RichT:
I know a little boy with Down Syndrome who at the age of 6 still can not eat regular food due to his inability to swallow without choking or gagging. He eats through a feeding tube. Obviously we don’t know the exact situation of the boy in this article, but I just wanted to point this out as a possibility. Also the father points out it is a texture issue. This is quite common with Autism and Down Syndrome. My daughter flips out if she gets mashed potatoes on her fingers, yet finger painting is okay. Go figure…
I wonder if Catholics being sustained through a feeding tube can have a drop of consecrated wine added to the mix???

That’s just the thing, there must be some way to get that one drop of wine to these people, that’s all it would take, but as you noted, each person is different.

I guess I would believe or have faith that Jesus would come to the assistance of these people so that the one drop could be received without the usual responses from ‘other’ food types.

From what I gathered from the article, the diocese wants to work with the family to come up with a proper solution. I would like to see the family work with the diocese to find that solution rather than have them dig in their heels to keep doing it the way they’re used to, that’s all.
 
40.png
Libero:
Sometimes it is about ensuring that we take whatever action necessary to ensure that all, even those with disabilites fulfill their role within the church. I am positive that progress could be made on this matter, if the church showed willing, it would be far easier for all parties involved.
The church is willing, its the family that is insisting on allowing him to continue to take communion in this fashion. Read the entire article and you will see that the Diocese is clearly making a valid attempt to help this boy and his family.
 
40.png
YinYangMom:
I wonder if Catholics being sustained through a feeding tube can have a drop of consecrated wine added to the mix???

That’s just the thing, there must be some way to get that one drop of wine to these people, that’s all it would take, but as you noted, each person is different.

I guess I would believe or have faith that Jesus would come to the assistance of these people so that the one drop could be received without the usual responses from ‘other’ food types.

From what I gathered from the article, the diocese wants to work with the family to come up with a proper solution. I would like to see the family work with the diocese to find that solution rather than have them dig in their heels to keep doing it the way they’re used to, that’s all.
Yes they could but it probably wouldn’t work in the normal Communion line and would probably have to be a part of a home visit. In this boys example, it sounds like he can eat some things, but do to the texture of the host, he spits it out. I have a daughter with Down Syndrome, and yes there are issues with both sensory and certain textures for DS kids and Autistic kids. Regarding one drop, the father states that the boy even spits out the wine thay have tried. This is probably something that will eventually work itself out as the boy gets older.
 
40.png
Libero:
Sometimes it is about ensuring that we take whatever action necessary to ensure that all, even those with disabilites fulfill their role within the church. I am positive that progress could be made on this matter, if the church showed willing, it would be far easier for all parties involved.
The Church IS trying to help him, but the parents are wanting to continue putting the host in his mouth then removing it and consuming it themselves becuase he’ll just spit it back out, this is silly and it gives the poor boy the idea that he is receiving when he isn’t. the Church is trying to work with the family to use suitable methods but it sounds like the family is being stubborn.
 
If he can´t eat the host, what can he and the church make? greetings
 
Well, what if someone has celiac disease and is an alcoholic so can’t receive under either species? It is unfortunate that such physical problems may prevent someone from participating in the sacrament of Holy Communion, but one can still make a spiritual communion. And furthermore, Christ would never hold someone accountable for not participating when they were physically incapable. Instead of trying to bend the Church to their family, they should try to prayerfully see where God is leading them with this situation. The desire to protect your child is powerful and rightfully so, but you don’t desecrate the Body of Christ to keep from hurting a kid’s feelings. God first, family second and all else will fall into place.
 
Well, I am absolutely flabbergasted at the attacks on the good Bishop. He is willing to work with the kid and his family to find the solution, so that this kid can actually receive the Eucharist. Currently, the kid is not receiving the Eucharist, and the Bishop is offering assistance to this family to help them enable the kid to receive Jesus. I don’t know the whole story, but the seeming unwillingness of the parents to work with the Diocese in helping the kid out, seems to me to be quite puzzling.
 
40.png
proud2bcatholic:
Well, I am absolutely flabbergasted at the attacks on the good Bishop. He is willing to work with the kid and his family to find the solution, so that this kid can actually receive the Eucharist. Currently, the kid is not receiving the Eucharist, and the Bishop is offering assistance to this family to help them enable the kid to receive Jesus. I don’t know the whole story, but the seeming unwillingness of the parents to work with the Diocese in helping the kid out, seems to me to be quite puzzling.
Amazing isn’t it? The Bishop upholds the teaching of the church and he gets attacked. What is this world coming to?
 
Maybe someone can explain to me why one drop of wine could not be consumed? I thought a drop of wine would just be soaked up by the tongue and not have to be swallow so therefore Matthew couldn’t spit it out??? The church is trying to help the family but in no way is it apporiate for the host to be removed from one person and given to another.That is not showing respect to our LORD at all. The facts are that this child is disable and can’t receive in the same fashion as others so the family and church need to work TOGETHER to follow the guidelines of the church.A document of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, “Guidelines for the Celebration of the Sacraments with Persons with Disabilities,” says, “Cases of doubt should be resolved in favor of the right of the baptized person to receive the sacrament. The existence of a disability is not considered in and of itself as disqualifying a person from receiving the Eucharist.”

GOD BLESS
Beckers
 
40.png
beckers:
Maybe someone can explain to me why one drop of wine could not be consumed? I thought a drop of wine would just be soaked up by the tongue and not have to be swallow so therefore Matthew couldn’t spit it out??? The church is trying to help the family but in no way is it apporiate for the host to be removed from one person and given to another.That is not showing respect to our LORD at all. The facts are that this child is disable and can’t receive in the same fashion as others so the family and church need to work TOGETHER to follow the guidelines of the church.A document of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, “Guidelines for the Celebration of the Sacraments with Persons with Disabilities,” says, “Cases of doubt should be resolved in favor of the right of the baptized person to receive the sacrament. The existence of a disability is not considered in and of itself as disqualifying a person from receiving the Eucharist.”

GOD BLESS
Beckers
If you read the entire article you will see that according to the father the boy spits the wine out as well. I have a child with mild sensory issues, and you would be surprised at how fast she can spit even the tiniest thing out of her mouth.
 
What can this child not particpate in the Eucharist in the Eastern Fashion?

Namely, the method with which the Eastern Catholic Churches communicate infants.

Present him with a gold rod that has been dipped in the Precious Blood.

The amount there is so small that even an infant cannot spit it out, but remains the Full Body, Blood Soul and Divinity of Christ.

It is very true that Christ will not deny Himself. But will the parents be willing to accept Christ as He offers Himself?

Or will they insist that their child falsely attempt to recieve Him in the guise of bread alone?
 
That noise you hear is my BS detector going off.

This is similar to another recent story about a child being “denied communion by the Catholic Church because she is alergic to gluten” (found in wheat.)

All together now, “Communion is complete in either species.”

This child can receive a drop of wine and have a complete communion. The child is not being denied communion, and the purpose of the article is to bash the Catholic Church.
 
vern humphrey:
This child can receive a drop of wine and have a complete communion. The child is not being denied communion, and the purpose of the article is to bash the Catholic Church.
And what I was proposing above is even less than a drop. But it is no less the Complete Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity than the contents of the entire tabernacle.
 
40.png
Brendan:
And what I was proposing above is even less than a drop. But it is no less the Complete Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity than the contents of the entire tabernacle.
And therefore those who say he is denied communion are liars. This is just another version of an anti-Catholic urban rumor.
 
40.png
jman507:
Jesus would never deny Communion because they cannot physically take it. In this desolation there is consolation. As he said those that did not see but yet had faith where more blessed than that that did see and believed, so I’d say it is true that those who cannot recieve but want to are more blessed than those that can and do, atleast as far as regarding recieveing blessings from Communion
If they cannot take it, then how are they receiving it? I suppose one could use a spoon and give a drop of the precious blood, but if he spits it out? We need to use God given reason here and not be overtaken by our emotions.
 
40.png
RichT:
Amazing isn’t it? The Bishop upholds the teaching of the church and he gets attacked. What is this world coming to?
Its the excessive emotionalism of people today. That’s what this world is coming to. That is also why you don’t hear any sermons on the fires of hell either, because that’s just mean and God ain’t no meanie 😛
 
vern humphrey:
That noise you hear is my BS detector going off.

This is similar to another recent story about a child being “denied communion by the Catholic Church because she is alergic to gluten” (found in wheat.)

All together now, “Communion is complete in either species.”

This child can receive a drop of wine and have a complete communion. The child is not being denied communion, and the purpose of the article is to bash the Catholic Church.
I remember that story. The mother objected to the child receiving the precious blood because it was “wine” and children shouldn’t have alcohol. What a dingbat.
 
40.png
RichT:
Amazing isn’t it? The Bishop upholds the teaching of the church and he gets attacked. What is this world coming to?
Teaching or no…sometimes bishops can just come across a little less than pastoral in these situations.
 
40.png
frommi:
Teaching or no…sometimes bishops can just come across a little less than pastoral in these situations.
Let me share with you an observation. I say this as one who is a University professor. It seems to me that our culture has an excessive concern with the possibility of “hurting feelings.” It is as if the only virtue is to avoid causing others emotional pain. The result is, of course, that we are habituating people (not just men) to become sissies. I had a friend who once said that “niceness” is an overrated virtue. I think he’s right. In fact, I would say that it is not a virtue at all. Of course we should try to be pleasant as possible, but that doesn’t mean that pleasantness in itself is some kind of virtue that must always be fostered. Sometimes pain is a good thing. Much of our obsession with being “nonjudgmental” “sweet” “nice” etc. really amounts to our cultural belief that we have a right to feel good as much as possible and people who get in the way of that are just meanies.

Others have suggested that if we had to go through a long term period of serious war or calamity, we would be doomed. And I think they are right. Imagine if we had to go through something like World War II today. It wouldn’t happen because most people have been raised to be total pansies. That includes women as well as men.

I was just watching Gladiator again. Probably my favorite movie, or at least one of my favorites. I must say that after watching movies like Gladiator, Saving Private Ryan, and Hero I 'm ashamed to be a human being in this nation in this generation. Sorry, I just get fed up with all this obsessive with weakness and not hurting anyone. Isn’t there any strength, courage, and virtue anymore?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top