Church Exorcist and Pro Life Priest Warns Against Harry Potter

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brooklyn
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Excuse me, but if my motives need to be questioned when I offer prayers on a Catholic message board, then I don’t think I should be here.
I’m not addressing this to you personally, because I haven’t read all your posts – this is an “in general” comment –

I don’t think it’s the “I will pray for you” part that irritates people; it’s more the way there often seems to be an unspoken addition of “because you are obviously lost since you don’t agree with my view.” That tone is used a lot, and certainly not just in this thread.
 
Sorry, the morality of the books is not at all grey. It is black and white.

Evil is evil. Good is good.

Again- a key, if not the key, point of the books is that it is the next life that is important. That no matter what happens in this life, win, lose, wield power or wealth- if we commit evil and destroy our soul we have lost for eternity. That if we have committed evil our only recourse is true remorse and repentance.

To paraphrase, it being too late to look it up and cut paste. The books are an exposition on fear of death, dangers of materialism, error in attachment to things of this world:

What gain, then, is it for anyone to win the whole world and forfeit his soul?

The critics of these books are ignoring or misrepresenting what they actually contain. The magic in ‘Frosty the Snowman’ is just as dangerous as HP if we use its opponents stated position.
Lil_flower_luv:

Peace and charity, we’ll assume our prayers for each other are in good faith.🙂 But, could you respond to my summation of the main theme to the book? How is a book which depicts evil ruining one’s soul for eternity unchristian? How is a book which emphasizes self-sacrifice and depicts the futility of attaching oneself to things of this world un-christian? How is a book with the message that we are in fact living for the next life unchristian? How does a book which flat out states that the only hope for the evil people of this world is true remorse? (No magic rites, no ceremonies, no potions, no invocation of spirits- just true remorse)

In HP, these are not subtle symbols. The focus of the last two novels is on the bad guy literally attaching his soul to things of this world to avoid death. With the contrast of the good guy being willing to give his very life to protect others- No greater love hath a man then to lay down his life for his friends and all that. Again, not hidden or subtle it’s the driver to the action and flow of the novel, the motivation for the conduct of the major characters. And the depiction of the ruin of the evil guy- again not in this world but the next- is shown, not implied, with the statement that the only hope for his salvation was true remorse- no appeal to magic or anything else, his own complete rejection and remorse for the evil he had done. Is that un-christian?

I won’t vouch for the movies, because a lot is wrapped up in the last novel and I can’t know if the movies will be in-line with the books.

But this is the frustration for those of us who have actually read the novels and talked about them with our kids. That’s what is in the books. No occult, no demons, no invocation of supernatural beings to acquire power.
 
If you need more specifics, they are literally strewn throughout this thread by we who enjoy Harry Potter and remain staunch Catholics. If you notice some of the previous threads, there are talks about ‘children or adults who may be confused’ avoiding these books. We have preached this from the start, and in those cases, this book can cause people to gain a curiosity for the Occult (although I don’t think reading the books ever caused possession, and no one has proven any case of that yet). However, for appropriate readers who can differentiate fact from fiction and pick out the morality in books, we find them enjoyable, especially in comparison to the filth that you find on tv. There aren’t sexual acts, abuse of drugs or alcohol, nor foul language - how many prime-time shows can claim not to have any of those for their entire run?
Hi Mumbles, thank you for your post. You and I do not disagree here.
Peace and charity, we’ll assume our prayers for each other are in good faith.🙂 But, could you respond to my summation of the main theme to the book? How is a book which depicts evil ruining one’s soul for eternity unchristian? How is a book which emphasizes self-sacrifice and depicts the futility of attaching oneself to things of this world un-christian? How is a book with the message that we are in fact living for the next life unchristian? How does a book which flat out states that the only hope for the evil people of this world is true remorse? (No magic rites, no ceremonies, no potions, no invocation of spirits- just true remorse)


But this is the frustration for those of us who have actually read the novels and talked about them with our kids. That’s what is in the books. No occult, no demons, no invocation of supernatural beings to acquire power.
🙂 God’s peace to those who have been patient with me and charitable even though we don’t see eye to eye on a few things! Thanks for the prayers.

My view has always been as our Pope was quoted to say, “Harry Potter] is a subtle seduction, which has deeply unnoticed and direct effects in undermining the soul of Christianity before it can really grow properly.”

Again, I think we agree on more than we think. HP can have long term negative and damaging effects—like any contemporary novel–on those who do not have a strong moral conscience. That has been my view as well as the view of other Catholics. I am not with the group who condemns you as “less of a Christian” because you read them. I hope you see that now.

Curly, I try to bring as much logic into the discussion as I can…you all agree with what HP can do to those who are not among us in our beliefs and practices…our Faith. Thank you to those who have kept the discussion charitable and fair.

Therese
 
Michael O’Brien’s critiques are badly written in the eyes of those who cannot just step back and look anew at what you’re defending for even a second.
Michael O’Brien’s critique of Harry Potter is obviously incongruous with the text. Take his claim that the books suggest that the end justifies the means. In reality, that the end does not justify the means is such an obvious, in-your-face theme of the seventh book that it’s almost embarrassingly didactic. Dumbledore’s acceptance of the idea that the end justifies the means literally led to his sister’s murder and a lifetime of repentance from the idea.
Have you any evidence of Rowling’s Christian beliefs?
You mean the Christian beliefs she publicly acknowledges and says are obviously expressed in her books?

hogwartsprofessor.com/ms-rowling-discusses-christian-content-of-novels/
And if we want this discussion to go anywhere, I would like page numbers and paragraphs proving the Christian symbolism in Harry Potter.
Ok.

Harry is helped by a Christ figure in the climax of every book, as John Granger easily demonstrates.
  • Book 1: The philosopher’s stone itself, which is a Christ symbol in spiritual alchemy
  • Book 2: Phoenix
  • Book 3: White stag
  • Book 4: Phoenix song
  • Book 5: Phoenix, again, sacrificing his life in Dumbledore’s battle with Voldemort.
  • Book 6: Dumbledore himself, hippogriff
  • Book 7: Harry himself, or Lily, whose original sacrifice is once again the key in Harry’s “resurrection.”
If you really want page numbers, I’ll get them. Can you give me page number of passages that are morally unacceptable?

We haven’t even talked about how the seventh book directly quotes the Bible twice. Or about how the climax of the second book exactly follows the format of an allegorical medieval passion play. Or about how Voldemort’s evil rebirthing party is an inversion of the Christian Sacraments (Voldemort goes into the waters as a baby and comes out an old man, the opposite of Baptism).
And no comparing HP himself with Jesus, if you can help it.
The character whose birth and defeating of the evil one is prophesied and who then sacrifices his life to save his friends isn’t admissible as a symbol for Christ?
 
(name removed by moderator): Your last several replies made my day (your repetition of “oh dear…”). I laughed so hard! Well done, sir. Well done!
I’ve read LOTR twice (on my third time), and you know what, unless you’re looking for the Christian symbolism you’re going to miss it
Indeed. Thematically and in terms of worldview it’s a strikingly Christian work (and I think it’s easily the best out of any book brought up in this thread), but Harry Potter is actually more explicitly Christian (due to the books’ alchemical structure and the presence of an allegorical Christ figure at each novel’s climax). I’d say it’s in between Narnia (which, while not an allegory itself of course, does have elements which can legitimately be described as allegorical) and Lord of the Rings.
Look at The Hobbit, the morals expressed there include stealing is good, breaking the laws of a land is ok, and the book includes a copious amount of deception by the main characters (to keep secrets or because of greed, both are motives). Now, unless this book was written by Tolkien people would be all over this book.
Indeed. By the standards of the anti-Potter crowd, The Hobbit would be a terrifyingly morally corrosive book for a child.
Lewis praises someone who uses astrology in his book.
Yep, Glenstorm. Also, Lucy reads some pretty unscrupulous spells from a spell book in Dawn Treader - and even uses one successfully - though when Aslan shows up to rebuke her, it’s nonetheless revealed that the magician who owns and uses the book is a dedicated servant of Aslan and is presented by the narrator as a good guy.

Again, by the standards of the anti-Potter crowd, this would dangerously suggest that the Lord approves of manipulative magical practices for some individuals…
I can comfortably say the age-old argument that HP books have Christian content is nothing but an insult to the Church you are part of.
You wouldn’t even know, judging by your passionate demonstrations of enthusiastically spectacular ignorance of the content and themes of Harry Potter.
Lewis and Tolkien, real Christian fantasy authors, wrote from a Christian perspective, therefore their books contained clear Christian symbolism. Have you any evidence of Rowling’s Christian beliefs? And if we want this discussion to go anywhere, I would like page numbers and paragraphs proving the Christian symbolism in Harry Potter. And no comparing HP himself with Jesus, if you can help it.
Okay, I’ll give you a tiny sampling of the immensely numerous examples of all these - in three sections: (a) Rowling’s personal faith, (b) positive spiritual and moral lessons from the novels, and (c) clear and conspicuous Christian symbolism.

(A) Rowling’s Personal Faith

Wikipedia is the easiest way to verify this (it cites its sources here). It verifies that - as numerous interviews attest - Rowling has been a practicing Christian (she’s Church of Scotland/Church of England) virtually all her life. For instance, when asked if she is a Christian, she responded, ‘‘Yes, I am… every time I’ve been asked if I believe in God, I’ve said yes, because I do, but no one ever really has gone any more deeply into it than that, and I have to say that does suit me, because if I talk too freely about that I think the intelligent reader, whether 10 or 60, will be able to guess what’s coming in the books.’’

SOURCE: Wyman, Max. “‘You can lead a fool to a book but you can’t make them think’”. Vancouver Sun. accio-quote.org/articles/2000/1000-vancouversun-wyman.htm. 26 October 2000. Retrieved 29 October 2007.
 
(B) Positive spiritual and moral lessons from the novels

There are many positive spiritual and moral lessons in the novels. Sadly I do not have time to document a selection that does justice to just how prevalent they are. Also, many of the most beautiful themes are reiterated repeatedly (obedience to good, choosing what’s right over what is easy, love/courage/self-sacrifice is stronger than the bad guy’s power, etc.), so I’ll refrain from citing more than one example of any.

At the end of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, the first novel, Harry is shocked to discover that Dumbledore thinks it’s okay that the Philosopher’s Stone - which can provide immortality and wealth - has been destroyed. On p. 320 of the U.K. edition, Dumbledore tells Harry, “You know, the Stone was really not such a wonderful thing. As much money and life as you could want! The two things most human beings would choose above all - the trouble is, humans do have a knack of choosing precisely those things which are worst for them.”

On that same page in Philosopher’s Stone, as well as on p.722 of Goblet of Fire, and elsewhere, Dumbledore emphasizes that truth is always superior to falsehood.

Also in Goblet of Fire, p.724: “Remember, if the time should come when you have to make a choice between what is right and what is easy, remember [Cedric Diggory, whom Voldemort murdered].”

This theme of doing what is right rather than what is easy is reiterated elsewhere as well.

The books glorify selfless mercy. For instance:

Deathly Hallows, p.741, Harry knows he can destroy Voldemort, but he tries to get him to repent before he attacks him: “But before you try to kill me, I’d advise you to think about what you’ve done… Think, and try for some remorse… It’s your one last chance,” said Harry, “it’s all you’ve got left… I’ve seen what you’ll be otherwise… Be a man… try… Try for some remorse…”

This echoes what Hermione said earlier in the book on p. 103 when asked if there’s a cure for the grave spiritual self-mutilation that Voldemort has deliberately inflicted on himself in order to gain evil power: “Isn’t there a way of putting yourself back together?” Ron asked. “Yes,” said Hermione with a hollow smile, “but it would be excruciatingly painful… remorse. You’ve got to really feel what you’ve done.”

Okay, I can’t resist one more example of the series’ glorification of heroic mercy. This is also an example of doing what’s right versus what’s easy:

Prisoner of Azkaban, p.375. Peter Pettigrew is exposed as having handed over Harry’s parents to Voldemort: “You don’t understand!” whined Pettigrew. “He would have killed me, Sirius!”
“Then you should have died!” roared Black. “Died rather than betray your friends, as we would have done for you!”
Black and Lupin stood shoulder to shoulder, wands raised.
“You should have realized,” said Lupin quietly, “if Voldemort didn’t kill you, we would. Good-bye, Peter.”
Hermione covered her face with her hands and turned to the wall.
“NO!” Harry yelled. He ran forward, placing himself in front of Pettigrew, facing the wands. “You can’t kill him,” he said breathlessly. “You can’t.”
“Harry, this piece of vermin is the reason you have no parents,” Black snarled. “This cringing bit of filth would have seen you die too, without turning a hair. You heard him. His own stinking skin meant more to him than your whole family.”
“I know,” Harry panted.

On this page, it is Harry’s mercy that saves Peter Pettigrew.

The importance of moral integrity and spiritual well-being:

Deathly Hallows, p. 104: “Look, if I picked up a sword right now, Ron, and ran you through with it, I wouldn’t damage your soul at all.”
“Which would be a real comfort to me, I’m sure,” said Ron. Harry laughed.
“It should be actually! But my point is that whatever happens to your body, your soul will survive, untouched.”

The context here is the way Voldemort has used murder to make himself evil enough to tear apart his soul, since hiding pieces of his soul brings him closer to bodily invincibility.

Voldemort’s ends-justifies-the-means battle against death doesn’t save him. All this echoes Christ’s words, “He who seeks his life will lose it; and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.” (Matt. 10:39).

Speaking of which, here are some quotations from the climax of the last novel:

Deathly Hallows, p. 691, after Harry finds out that in order for Voldemort to be destroyed he has to sacrifice himself (if you want to know the reason, read the books; it would take too long for me to explain here): “Harry understood at last that he was not supposed to survive. His job was to walk calmly into Death’s welcoming arms.”

The chapter after Harry makes this sacrifice is titled “King’s Cross” (Chapter Thirty-Five).

There’s much I wish I could quote and explain from that chapter, but I don’t want to spoil anything in it in case you ever do decide to read the series, lil_flower_luv.

This sampling is pitifully incomplete. I wasn’t exactly sure where to look to find the exact page numbers for all of the wonderful lessons that always stuck with me. But there you have it.

Oh, one more thing: the Bible quotations from Deathly Hallows. On Christmas Eve, Harry and Hermione visit the graveyard where Harry’s parents and Dumbledore’s mother and sister are all buried. Matt. 6:19-21 is on the latter pair’s tombstone, and 1 Corinthians 15:26 is on the former pair’s tombstone.

Here’s a link about that scene: phoenixweasley.wordpress.com/2010/12/20/christmas-in-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows/

I’m glad I found it, because at the bottom it advertises a book I hadn’t heard of: The Lord of the Hallows: Christian Symbolism and Themes in J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter by Denise Roper. I’ll have to check it out!
 
Finally, I would like to close with three paragraphs from an article I found by someone named Lisa Cherrett:

"We all know about the furore in some sections of the Christian church over the supposed wickedness of Harry Potter. I don’t intend to give much air-time today to the arguments of the anti-Potter protestors. Suffice it to say that, as a Christian myself, I don’t believe at all that Harry is an evil and corrupting influence on his fans. In fact, my view is that when we look closely at the ideas about moral choices and the nature of good and evil that are contained in the story, we find surprising parallels to themes that are prominent in biblical Christianity.

Or perhaps they’re not so surprising, if you concur with C.S. Lewis, author of the Narnia Chronicles, who believed that what he called ‘sub-Christian’ values can be identified in much of the best secular literature, even the pagan myths that he loved from childhood and throughout his life. By sub-Christian values he meant images and principles that can form a foundation for understanding fully-fledged Christian doctrine (Lewis, Christian Reflections 39–40) . He also believed, perhaps more controversially, that human beings are designed by God to be deeply attracted to ideas in literature that draw us closer to a knowledge of God.

This is not to say, of course, that J.K. Rowling has deliberately included biblical Christian imagery in Harry Potter. Even C.S. Lewis, at the moment when the inspiration for the Narnia Chronicles first came to him, wasn’t intending to write specifically Christian children’s fiction (Lewis, On Stories 53). The Christian parallels in those stories emerged naturally from his deep personal faith; they were not pasted in as the ‘lesson for today’."

Nonetheless, Christian imagery and lessons made their way into Rowling’s imagination as she wrote Harry Potter just as they did when Lewis wrote Narnia.

(C) Clear and conspicuous Christian symbolism

Transformer began to cover this in the reply above mine. He offered to give you more specifics if you wanted. Or you could get books by John Granger or the one by Denise Roper that I said I discovered in that link above.
 
Lil_flower_luv:

Peace and charity, we’ll assume our prayers for each other are in good faith.🙂 But, could you respond to my summation of the main theme to the book? How is a book which depicts evil ruining one’s soul for eternity unchristian? How is a book which emphasizes self-sacrifice and depicts the futility of attaching oneself to things of this world un-christian? How is a book with the message that we are in fact living for the next life unchristian? How does a book which flat out states that the only hope for the evil people of this world is true remorse? (No magic rites, no ceremonies, no potions, no invocation of spirits- just true remorse)

In HP, these are not subtle symbols. The focus of the last two novels is on the bad guy literally attaching his soul to things of this world to avoid death. With the contrast of the good guy being willing to give his very life to protect others- No greater love hath a man then to lay down his life for his friends and all that. Again, not hidden or subtle it’s the driver to the action and flow of the novel, the motivation for the conduct of the major characters. And the depiction of the ruin of the evil guy- again not in this world but the next- is shown, not implied, with the statement that the only hope for his salvation was true remorse- no appeal to magic or anything else, his own complete rejection and remorse for the evil he had done. Is that un-christian?

I won’t vouch for the movies, because a lot is wrapped up in the last novel and I can’t know if the movies will be in-line with the books.

But this is the frustration for those of us who have actually read the novels and talked about them with our kids. That’s what is in the books. No occult, no demons, no invocation of supernatural beings to acquire power.
lil_flower_luv, I hope you don’t miss this superb reply, either. I’ve quoted it to ensure that you don’t miss it because of my long replies.
 
Ok, time for all you Harry Potter fans to come at me with your worst, because I know you will. But I saw this article, written about a very holy priest on the front line in our spiritual battle against Satan, and I have to put it out here, even though I know it will meet with ridicule and even hate coming from Harry Potter fans. But here goes.

catholic.org/hf/faith/story.php?id=37447

There, I’ve done my part. Hopefully this will be of help to someone who is not so sure about Harry Potter. For all you die-hard fans, I know it’s hopeless. It’s scary how much of a hold these stories have over some people so that they won’t even consider that there might be something wrong with them. If only people would hold to the dogma of the Church as rigidly.
I agree with Father. At first, I thought this was a total exaggeration until I began reading the Sorcerer’s Stone and stopped in disgust. This is more than fantasy, there are spells, witches etc. that the children are encouraged to emulate. I also judge a book on how it is written, and granted it is written for children, it is still sloppy writing. She can’t compare with C.S. Lewis Narnia series.
 
I agree with Father. At first, I thought this was a total exaggeration until I began reading the Sorcerer’s Stone and stopped in disgust. This is more than fantasy, there are spells, witches etc. that the children are encouraged to emulate. I also judge a book on how it is written, and granted it is written for children, it is still sloppy writing. She can’t compare with C.S. Lewis Narnia series.
In the immortal words of Jharek Carnelian: oh dear…
 
I wonder if you have drawn those conclusions from my posts? Nope!

Jherek, my friend, you are too hasty to put a label on my forehead.
 
I wonder if you have drawn those conclusions from my posts? Nope!

Jherek, my friend, you are too hasty to put a label on my forehead.
He’s not talking about you, just anti-Potter/anti-fantasy posts in general. Don’t take it personal. 😉

And in all honesty? Jharek’s not the only one noticing this recent trend in anti-imaginative thinking. From what we’ve read, you’d think having an artistic imagination alone is a sin to these people. :rolleyes:
 
:clapping:

does sound kinda fundy doesn’t it…??

Me thinks some give evil too much press…as evil is vain…I am sure it enjoys the attention.

Imagination is a wonderful thing. I enjoy a movie escape whether it’s The Notebook or Stephen King’s Christine.😛
 
Not to mention they can be fired against all other works in the fantasy genre. There goes my chances of reconciling my faith with my dream of having a career writing fantasy. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
The renaming of the first novel for the U.S. market is a pet peeve of mine as well.

Did I refer to it in any of my replies as Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, (name removed by moderator)? Yikes. I thought I never did that. The renaming irks me quite a bit, since Rowling didn’t make up the idea of a “Philosopher’s stone”: it’s a standard alchemical legend, and renaming it significantly affects the whole spiritual foundation of the series. Obnoxious publisher…
And in all honesty? Jharek’s not the only one noticing this recent trend in anti-imaginative thinking. From what we’ve read, you’d think having an artistic imagination alone is a sin to these people. :rolleyes:
I’ve noticed it too.

Welcome home, (name removed by moderator)!

I hope you won’t let yourself be discouraged by an apparent trend of growing hostility among Christians toward imagination and fantasy. I really do think it’s mainly a crazy Internet thing. The vast majority of Catholics I know do enjoy or at least respect fantasy, and they have great imaginations. You’re in good company, (name removed by moderator), company that certainly includes C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, J.K. Rowling, and numerous others, both authors and those who simply enjoy fantastical stories.

It reminds me of how Chesterton praises “penny dreadfuls” in Orthodoxy: he says that although he didn’t know it at the time, they “were indeed written in a healthy and heroic spirit of Christianity.”

It also reminds me of how Lewis says in Dawn Treader that Eustace didn’t know anything about dragons because he “hadn’t read any of the right books.” 😛
 
Well, a lot of the controversy around HP has been due to the fact it’s targeted at the ‘tween’ demographic. I haven’t seen a lot of vitriol directed at adults reading fantasy, it seems to be the idea that the young and impressionable can be influenced by them negatively.

I don’t agree with that argument either, especially the HP novels, but again I don’t see a blanket condemnation of fantasy, just the idea that some fantasy series would be inappropriate for 'tweens.

As I’ve said before, I read a lot of sci-fi and fantasy as a kid- Asimov, Heinlin, Asprin, Bradbury, Stephen King and I think everything Zelazny ever wrote. None of it ever interested me in dabbling in anything like the occult. But I was raised in a strong Catholic home where there was also an appreciation for literature.
What I did see influencing my peers, was the idea that what people think of as supernatural (spirits, demons, visions etc.) were actually naturally occurring but poorly understood phenomena. Particularly psychic, several of them had some bad experiences trying to develop their ‘natural’ ESP/psychic abilities. Can’t help but think of it when I see reference to new age practises, or the potential of quantum mechanics as a possible explanation for these kinds of things including multiple parallel universes as a source of beings we describe as angels/demons. (Myth series by Asprin was comedic twist on idea of multi-verse) Dinesh D’souza (sp?) actually references quantum mechanics and multi-verses in his defense of an after-life in “Life After Death”.
 
Not to mention they can be fired against all other works in the fantasy genre. There goes my chances of reconciling my faith with my dream of having a career writing fantasy. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
I’ve always encouraged you to write about what you love writing about, Lost! May God use your talents. He gave you that creative mind. 🙂
It also reminds me of how Lewis says in Dawn Treader that Eustace didn’t know anything about dragons because he “hadn’t read any of the right books.” 😛
Very true, FB. And I love that book.

From where I’m sitting, HP can not be put into the same category as Narnia. But no matter. 🙂 We are all entitled to our opinion. You know where I stand so I will surely take my leave now. Leave the deep debate for those who do not want Catholics or Christians to be reading the books–they will have their ideas, so please be respectful. I personally don’t like Potter books and don’t endorse them, but that is where my conscience has put me.

May you receive blessings in abundance this Christmas.
God bless,
Therese
 
Well, a lot of the controversy around HP has been due to the fact it’s targeted at the ‘tween’ demographic. I haven’t seen a lot of vitriol directed at adults reading fantasy, it seems to be the idea that the young and impressionable can be influenced by them negatively.

I don’t agree with that argument either, especially the HP novels, but again I don’t see a blanket condemnation of fantasy, just the idea that some fantasy series would be inappropriate for 'tweens.
Oh, I agree, for the most part.

But occasionally someone does come along with statements like, “I don’t think faithful Catholics should want to fill their heads with that garbage,” or “Hey, it’s your conscience,” or “I don’t think we should be promoting such morally problematic works.”

But of course I admit you’re right: most detractors simply don’t want young people to read them.
From where I’m sitting, HP can not be put into the same category as Narnia. But no matter. 🙂 We are all entitled to our opinion. You know where I stand so I will surely take my leave now. Leave the deep debate for those who do not want Catholics or Christians to be reading the books–they will have their ideas, so please be respectful. I personally don’t like Potter books and don’t endorse them, but that is where my conscience has put me.

May you receive blessings in abundance this Christmas.
God bless,
Therese
Merry Christmas, Therese!
 
I personally don’t like Potter books and don’t endorse them, but that is where my conscience has put me.
Now, now, saying your conscience bothers you about it still doesn’t seem quite right. It sounds more like you’re confusing “conscience” with personal dislike or personal allergy. Some people are allergic to peanut butter for instance, however, that doesn’t mean their immune system is telling them that peanut butter is bad. 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top