P
pepipop
Guest
There was a lady on the TV show last night who had it done at 18, without her consent. The procedure involves breaking bones in the pelvic area, which do not necessarily heal properly or reset in a another position. When she was released from hospital she could not walk at all, and went on to have permanent incontinence and numerous other symptoms, cancer of the womb etc.Barbaric practice ?
I know in medicine techniques. The technique was bad. If it was used since the 1600s then it should be “baddest”. I mean there are extremely violent medical techniques today which are perfectly successful and bring no pain.
So, the whole thing is rather strange unless explained thoroughly.
Ireland continued with the practice due to the high mortality rate for caesarean:-
“Research has shown that the procedure of symphiosotomy was performed in Ireland from the early 20th century. This was at a time when Caesarean Section had a high mortality rate due to sepsis (blood poisoning) and symphiosotomy was regarded as a life-saving measure for both mother and baby. From 1950’s onwards, symphysiotomy was gradually replaced by the modern Caesarean Section as antibiotics were available by then to treat infection and sepsis was less of a hazard.”
A statement from a discussion at the Irish parliament:-
The Minister said symphysiotomy is not a barbaric act. In strict terms, he is correct. Amputation is not a barbaric act but the amputation of a healthy limb by a medical professional would be a barbaric act. What was perpetrated on these women needlessly, unnecessarily and with their knowledge was barbarism by medical professionals. It shocks us to the core to think it could have happened.
debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2012/03/15/00005.asp