C
CrypticWritings
Guest
There is nothing wrong with making time to talk to your pastor about your concerns. And there is nothing wrong with giving up on your aspirations to be a lector in order to remain as you were previous to this dilemma.
There is also nothing wrong with attending a different parish as we must be guardians of our own faith and try (reasonably) within our means to place ourselves in an authentic Catholic environment that is (most) conducive to our growth in faith and virtue. Even aside from the clergy, part of (perhaps often but not always) the reason leaders persist in their actions whether right or wrong is because people allow them to and they see that people are accepting of their mandate, directive, discipline, practice etc.
If you do choose to confront him, be charitable, direct and stand your ground, but do remember charity. It is always best to thank people for the good that they do and offer, even when you must confront them with a problem. After all, he is a priest and ordained so proper respect must be given. I don’t know for sure, but I would say that it is possible the reason so many bishops and priest are disobedient to tradition is because they have all the support of the dissenters, and little, if any support of the good orthodox Catholics. Leaders need good and faithful followers who charitably and justifiably correct them when wrong and stand behind them when they are right. I understand that there are extreme circumstances or situations/problems, but this is just a generalization.
Using the GIRM would be difficult for anyone to challenge him or anyone else with. From what I have read of the GIRM posted here so far by previous forum users the language of the GIRM is not very directive although it is claimed that the GIRM is a directive itself. In other words, the GIRM doesn’t seem to use language that is fit for use in a directive.
Phrases like:
“But they should kneel at the consecration…”
You can take that to your priest and tell him that the GIRM instructs the faithful to kneel.
However, he can direct you toward that exact same line and tell you that the word should implies that he or a bishop has the liscence to carry out that part of the liturgy as he sees fit.
While this wording was most likely used to account for the faithful who are not physically able to kneel (due to age or handicap), and expresses a norm for the faithful to follow, it is still weak wording.
To be a directive it would be less problematic to read:
“The faithful must kneel at the consencration…”*
*except in cases of age, handicap, etc…
That is much (not all) of the problem with much of the post concicular documents in that they contain weak wording that leaves them too open for interpretation.
Pray for him (your priest) and it wouldn’t hurt to let him know you do such a holy spiritual work for his beloved soul.
There is also nothing wrong with attending a different parish as we must be guardians of our own faith and try (reasonably) within our means to place ourselves in an authentic Catholic environment that is (most) conducive to our growth in faith and virtue. Even aside from the clergy, part of (perhaps often but not always) the reason leaders persist in their actions whether right or wrong is because people allow them to and they see that people are accepting of their mandate, directive, discipline, practice etc.
If you do choose to confront him, be charitable, direct and stand your ground, but do remember charity. It is always best to thank people for the good that they do and offer, even when you must confront them with a problem. After all, he is a priest and ordained so proper respect must be given. I don’t know for sure, but I would say that it is possible the reason so many bishops and priest are disobedient to tradition is because they have all the support of the dissenters, and little, if any support of the good orthodox Catholics. Leaders need good and faithful followers who charitably and justifiably correct them when wrong and stand behind them when they are right. I understand that there are extreme circumstances or situations/problems, but this is just a generalization.
Using the GIRM would be difficult for anyone to challenge him or anyone else with. From what I have read of the GIRM posted here so far by previous forum users the language of the GIRM is not very directive although it is claimed that the GIRM is a directive itself. In other words, the GIRM doesn’t seem to use language that is fit for use in a directive.
Phrases like:
“But they should kneel at the consecration…”
You can take that to your priest and tell him that the GIRM instructs the faithful to kneel.
However, he can direct you toward that exact same line and tell you that the word should implies that he or a bishop has the liscence to carry out that part of the liturgy as he sees fit.
While this wording was most likely used to account for the faithful who are not physically able to kneel (due to age or handicap), and expresses a norm for the faithful to follow, it is still weak wording.
To be a directive it would be less problematic to read:
“The faithful must kneel at the consencration…”*
*except in cases of age, handicap, etc…
That is much (not all) of the problem with much of the post concicular documents in that they contain weak wording that leaves them too open for interpretation.
Pray for him (your priest) and it wouldn’t hurt to let him know you do such a holy spiritual work for his beloved soul.
