Church should not pursue conversion of Jews, pope says

  • Thread starter Thread starter TomD123
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
From a Jewish perspective, while it is easier for the Gentile then for the Jew to get into the world to come, any Jew who breaks his/her eternal covenant with God and adopts beliefs as those in Christianity, is cut off forever from God and from the Jewish people.

I would posit that neither the Catholic Church nor Catholics every truly sought or desired mass conversion of the Jews. The Roman pagans who became the Roman Catholics, who declared that they were now the “true” Jews and the new holders of the new covenant, created the image of “the Jew” as a malignant and detrimental force to Christianity and to Christian society. “The Jews” (a collective inclusive term in the Christian scriptures) were painted as having killed the Christian messiah, as killing Christian children for their rituals and for making matza, as desecrating the Eucharist. An early Catholic saint would write that these Christ killers were subhuman (as “beasts of burden”) deserving of death (“fit only for slaughter”). The Catholic Church would place the Jews in ghettos, make them wear special and humiliating articles of clothing marking them as Jews, deny and prevent them from sharing the same basic civil rights as those enjoyed by the Christian populace, deny and prevent any social or work interaction between Jews and Christians . The reasoning behind these acts was that contact of the Jew with the Christian was something to be avoided lest the Christian be tainted, lest the Jews succeed in undermining Christian faith and institutions.

It should therefore be of no surprise that the first Shoah, the massacring of some one half of European Jewry, occurred during the Crusades by Christian Crusaders on their way to decide which non Jews should occupy the eternal homeland of the Jews.

That is not to say that Catholic mobs rampaging and murdering Jews did not often shout “convert or die”. However, when a large group of Spanish Jewry, after some five thousand Jews had been murdered, responded to the Catholic pogroms by actually converting, the result was fear, hate, jealousy and mistrust by Catholics of these converts. The end result was the Spanish Inquisition and the total destruction of the one thousand year old Jewish community on the Iberian peninsula. Every Jew would end up be either being murdered, converted or expelled.

More than half a century after the 1492 expulsion of the Jews, the Church would introduce racial purity laws denying assistance to those Christians carrying “tainted” Jewish blood. The Jesuit order would require any Catholic who wished to join the order to show that they were free of Jewish blood back five generations. This requirement was only changed in 1946 after the Shoah.

Some posters feel that **not ** converting the Jews is “anti-Semitic”. This ignores the obvious. We Jews are apparently too deficient of character, or genetically marred or lacking in intelligence to understand the “Truth” staring them in the face, to know what’s good for them. This certainly was the basis for the Catholic justification of the Mortara affair.

So if treating Jews and Judaism with respect rather than disdain is anti-Semitic, then let’s hear it for the anti-Semites.👍
 
The Church has always taught, and defined as a dogma at the Council of Florence, that all Jews who die without entering the Catholic Church will “descend immediatly into hell to be punished with the devil and his angles”. What could be more anti-Semetic than saying we should not seek to convert the Jews? Do we want them to be lost for all eternity?
This is not what the Church teaches about Jews. The Church teaches that Jews can be saved because “On account of their fathers this people remains most dear to God, for God does not repent of the gifts He makes nor of the calls He issues.” Lumen Gentium 16.
 
I think Papa Benedict is just trying to be diplomatic. I read the article and he states he believes “Isreal is in God’s hands,” and who’s better hands are there to be in but God’s? I feel so sorry for our Pope. He’s damned-if-he-does and he’s damned-if-he-doesnt these days.
 
Perhaps Benedict XVI needs to read what the Church infallibly declares below…

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Cantate Domino,1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans ** but also Jews ** or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives…”

We can see that the Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all who die as Jews go to the fires of Hell
 
Perhaps Benedict XVI needs to read what the Church infallibly declares below…

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Cantate Domino,1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans ** but also Jews ** or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives…”

We can see that the Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all who die as Jews go to the fires of Hell
The Church does not teach that “all who die as Jews go to the fires of Hell.”
 
Perhaps Benedict XVI needs to read what the Church infallibly declares below…

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Cantate Domino,1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans ** but also Jews ** or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives…”

We can see that the Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all who die as Jews go to the fires of Hell
No, Pope Benedict XVI is definitely not in error. Benedict XVI knows a bit more about what was revealed by God in the 569 years since Pope Eugene IV walked this small world. For examle, when Pope Eugene IV made that statement there was only Judaism, Catholicism and Islam. But Pope Benedict XVI sees 100s of Christian denominations, Jews and Muslims, with some very devout and dedicated members who love and worship God just as much as some Catholics do. The Church can no longer influence national leaders to round up Jews, Muslims, and Christians who deviate from what the Church teaches, question them, and put them to death if they don’t pass the Catholic Test. The Church can do very little, if at all, to prevent others from not being Catholic.

There is no reason in the world why the early Church Fathers wouldn’t threaten hellfire and damnation for anyone who wouldn’t join them. How else would they get compliance at that time period? As the Church grew and developed, along with the rest of the world, they were able to see other peoples’ efforts to nurture their relationship with God, and they know these people will be rewarded for it.

I don’t see how someone can be saved just by saying, for fear of bodily mutilation and/or death that they are Catholic, when in their hearts they are no more Catholic after their forced conversion than they were before 🤷
 
Oh pishtosh. There is no ‘difference’ from the teaching of Pope Eugene and the teaching of the Church today. There is a greater understanding for which we can probably thank, ironically enough, the protestant 'reformers.

Because when they ‘split’ from the Church it became obvious that even though they separated in PART from the universal Catholic Church, they still remained with PART of the truth. And that even though they are not formal members of the Catholic Church, they are still tied to that Church because they ‘split’ away. A tree branch which has been cut partly away from the tree is still part of the tree; if it is living it is because the TREE is still living and supplies to it enough nutrients that it still survives even though it is no longer completely bound and wholly belonging the tree.

Because the Church itself is the fulfillment of Judaism we can also go backward and see that the ROOTS of the Church are Jewish roots. Some of those roots still feed the "tree’ of Christianity. Of course, some roots have been pulled out and ‘uprooted’, and some have twisted on themselves and deviated far from the tree. . .but they are still ‘part’ in some way.

Even those who are not part of the tree at all exist in a way that affects the tree. The soil of humanity existed in the beginning and in order for the tree to grow the roots must take nourishment from the soil, from the rain and the air, etc. Those are the people who are not part of the Judeo-Christian tradition. They are still in a sense ‘part of the tree’ in helping the tree to live, and thus, those who are ‘saved’ are saved through their efforts in regard to the tree (of Christianity).

You will note that in Catholic teaching that all humans are part of the Church in some way (as above) and that it is not said that they WILL be saved who are not formal members of that Church, but that they MAY be saved. That is God’s choice and decision. Being a member of the Catholic Church does not guarantee salvation, for as St. Paul reminds us, we must strive to win the race and not think that just because we have ‘accepted Christ’ that we no longer need to try to run!
 
I take it to mean that, given the history of Jewish persecution at the hands of Christians, it is unseemly today for the Church to endorse specific plans that target the Jews for conversion. We should leave it in God’s hand, and not target them. That doesn’t mean that we stop praying for everyone to be converted, or that we don’t accept Jews who want to convert.
 
It’s interesting how so many Catholic apologists are able to answer Protestant propaganda against the Church exaggerating persecution, and pretending blamelessness and uninvolvement in any of it, but when it is from what are viewed as Jewish sources, they instead embrace the propaganda and condemn the Church.

This says something… it says a number of things for thoughtful people.
 
It’s interesting how so many Catholic apologists are able to answer Protestant propaganda against the Church exaggerating persecution, and pretending blamelessness and uninvolvement in any of it, but when it is from what are viewed as Jewish sources, they instead embrace the propaganda and condemn the Church.

This says something… it says a number of things for thoughtful people.
Yea, I see your point. It appears some Catholics will refute protestant attacks against the Church’s past, but embrace and even agree with jewish attacks against the Church’s history. It appears to be a Catholic/Jewish lovefest going on.

Plus, I’m amazed that some earlier posters claim the infallible statement from the Church I posted, which says all jews go to Hell, is no longer applicable. Gee, I thought Catholic dogma never changed. Guess they think it does.
 
Yea, I see your point. It appears some Catholics will refute protestant attacks against the Church’s past, but embrace and even agree with jewish attacks against the Church’s history. It appears to be a Catholic/Jewish lovefest going on.

Plus, I’m amazed that some earlier posters claim the infallible statement from the Church I posted, which says all jews go to Hell, is no longer applicable. Gee, I thought Catholic dogma never changed. Guess they think it does.
The CCC says this about those who are not Catholic, and those who are not Catholic includes Jews:
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:
Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.337
To deny the above as a teaching of the Church, is denying Catholic teachings. And heck, it’s okay if you reject the Church’s teachings, we’re not perfect, there are many things I don’t accept as true either. So who am I to criticize you for rejecting certain Church teachings? Everyone encounters their stumbling blocks at one time or another on their journey through life. But it’s right there in black and white in the catechism. 🤷

So while you may not agree with it, it would be hard to say it’s not a Church teaching when it’s right there in the Catechism for the world to see.
 
Plus, I’m amazed that some earlier posters claim the infallible statement from the Church I posted, which says all jews go to Hell, is no longer applicable. Gee, I thought Catholic dogma never changed. Guess they think it does.
I’m not amazed at all.

When you consider that its only you who are making the claim that the statement is infallible and since you are the Pope or the Church, it gets dismissed as a rant.
 
Wow did this post get a response.

Ok: as a convert to the church from a traditional Jewish background, I have a few observations. First, those of us who do convert frequently recieve all sorts of anger and malice. However, according to Halacha (Jewish law) nothing abrogates a Jews responsibility for observance… What does happen if a Jew becomes an apostate (by accepting membership in another religion) is the Jew loses their privileges within the community (for example, the modern right of return). So, for example Edith Stein will forever be viewed as an apostate for her conversion. When I converted, the reaction among my family was swift and harsh. However, I was led to believe that I could return to observant judaism … A Jewish identity (according to Halacha) Is never erased.

I agree with the two posters who mentioned two ugly facts. The first us the abysmal catechesis that exists. The church must undo the damage of the past several decades and re-evangelize the faithful. The church has lost so many of our own members… And it makes sense to concentrate there first. This forumn should not be the place for people to get the information they require. And btw, the RCC is not the only religious community that would benefit greatly from a return to basics in education .

The other area that I agree on is that the history of Christian leaders throughout the past 1000 years has been very ugly. The Dominicans of the Spanish inquisition, as well as the Jesuits of the past were equal to the antisemitic vitriol of Luther and Calvin. There were reasons why Lumen Gentium as well as other documents from Vatican 2 as well as JPII’s apology at he western wall. However, let’s not forget that during the crusades, the safest Jewish communities were in ITALY. Let’s not forget the thousands of Jews saved by the pope during ww2. Let’s not forget Bishop Graf Von Galen, as well as thousands of other priests and bishops who fought the Nazis. We especially owe it to those clerics (like Dietrich Bonhoeffer as well as countless others) who died fighting the Nazis.

The holy father s cognizant of theology as well as history. Let’s trust him on this issue in particular. He is urging us as a commnity not to target Jews…
 
It’s interesting how so many Catholic apologists are able to answer Protestant propaganda against the Church exaggerating persecution, and pretending blamelessness and uninvolvement in any of it, but when it is from what are viewed as Jewish sources, they instead embrace the propaganda and condemn the Church.

This says something… it says a number of things for thoughtful people.
This is a Catholic source: “Jews and Judaism” Original Catholic Encyclopedia (guaranteed free from Jewish propaganda 👍)

"The obligation of wearing a distinguishing badge was of course obnoxious to the Jews. At the same time, Church authorities deemed its injunction necessary to prevent effectively moral offenses between Jews and Christian women. The decrees forbidding the Jews from appearing in public at Easter-tide may be justified on the ground that some of them mocked at the Christian processions at that time; those against baptized Jews retaining distinctly Jewish customs find their ready explanation in the necessity for the Church to maintain the purity of the Faith in its members, while those forbidding the Jews from molesting converts to Christianity are no less naturally explained by the desire of doing away with a manifest obstacle to future conversions.

It was for the laudable reason of protecting social morality and securing the maintenance of the Christian Faith, that canonical decrees were framed and repeatedly enforced against free and constant intercourse between Christians and Jews, against, for instance, bathing, living, etc., with Jews. To some extent, likewise, these were the reasons for the institution of the Ghetto or confinement of the Jews to a special quarter, for the prohibition of the Jews from exercising medicine, or other professions. The inhibition of intermarriage between Jews and Christians, which is yet in vigor, is clearly justified by reason of the obvious danger for the faith of the Christian party and for the spiritual welfare of the children born of such alliances. With regard to the special legislation against printing, circulating, etc., the Talmud, there was the particular grievance that the Talmud contained at the time scurrilous attacks upon Jesus and the Christians (cf. Pick, “The Personality of Jesus in the Talmud” in the “Monist”, January, 1910), and the permanent reason that “that extraordinary compilation, with much that is grave and noble, contains also so many puerilities, immoral precepts, and anti-social maxims, that Christian courts may well have deemed it right to resort to stringent measures to prevent Christians from being seduced into adhesion to a system so preposterous” (Catholic Dictionary, 484).

History proves indeed that church authorities exercised at times considerable pressure upon the Jews to promote their conversion;"
 
Why do so many people think Catholics that reject Vatican II (Traditonalists) hate Jewish people?
 
Why do so many people think Catholics that reject Vatican II (Traditonalists) hate Jewish people?
Because some of them do, and unfortunately those that do (1) tend to bellow their thoughts more loudly than the others and (2) make for better press.
 
So exactly what did the Pope say? I would like to hear that first, but why do I think this is another statement that causes confusion among the faithful? How is this helpful?
 
It seems very likely that the mandate here is very similar to the instructions that Catholics are to follow with regard to the Eastern Orthodox, that individual laypeople should not attempt to convert individual Jews.
 
It seems very likely that the mandate here is very similar to the instructions that Catholics are to follow with regard to the Eastern Orthodox, that individual laypeople should not attempt to convert individual Jews.
Yes, it would seem that way. But would that make sense based on past traditional dogmatic teachings of the Catholic Church? It would seem to contradict past dogmatic teachings of the Catholic Church. Would it not? So is Benedict XVI claiming that the Orthodox and Jews of today are OK where they are? Is he saying it is better the Orthodox and Jews of today remain outside the Catholic Church, instead of inside of it? Is he claiming that the Jews of today don’t need to accept Jesus Christ to receive Salvation?
 
Yes, it would seem that way. But would that make sense based on past traditional dogmatic teachings of the Catholic Church? It would seem to contradict past dogmatic teachings of the Catholic Church. Would it not? So is Benedict XVI claiming that the Orthodox and Jews of today are OK where they are? Is he saying it is better the Orthodox and Jews of today remain outside the Catholic Church, instead of inside of it? Is he claiming that the Jews of today don’t need to accept Jesus Christ to receive Salvation?
Well, the mandate for individual lay Catholics not to attempt to evangelize to individual Orthodox is a very long-standing one (centuries old, at least). That’s based on the principle that evangelization involves principles that are very complex and that laypeople are not capable of dealing with properly without years of study, and that this sort of evangelization needs to be carried out bishop to bishop and Pope to Patriarch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top