-Quote (Originally by Mark121359)—
When you realize that the Catholic Church teaches *_authoritatively _*that homosexuality is an intrinsic evil (And I can’t emphasize that enough!!!) then you should without a doubt see why the Church cannot and should not advocate placing a child into this situation!
So now you are saying that the homosexual condition is evil? My understanding was the homosexual sex is disordered, not the individual. You are saying that a chaste homosexual is still intrinsically evil…
I wholeheartedly agree with Mark121359.
He is not saying or implying at all that the homosexual condition is evil. He is saying that the sexual acts of homosexuality are intrinsically evil and thus why it is wrong to place children with a homosexual couple. A chaste homosexual is no different to a single parent and therefore would be treated as such when it comes to these issues.
Please consider this - A Child also needs role models, which are the parents to mimic, whether people want them to or not, they will mimic them and their lifestyle if they are homosexual or heterosexual, because it’s all they know, there is no magical choice that they can make, because their choice is bias, with heterosexual parents their choice will be bias towards heterosexuality regardless if they are homosexual or heterosexual (they will try heterosexuality before they realise whether they are heterosexual or homosexual), same with homosexual parents, their choice will be bias towards homosexuality regardless if they are homosexual or heterosexual (they will try homosexuality before they realise whether they are heterosexual or homosexual), they mimic their parents in how to live their life by what they do, kids are very observant.
Please consider this:
A) The nature of homosexuality means using your organs in a manner they are not designed to be used for (this is why we say that homosexual desires are disordered and immoral desires to act on)
B) The greatest role models or influences in a Child’s life are their parents, not what they say, but what they do. (Example when a parent say’s to their Child “Don’t Smoke” the chances of that Child smoking are greatly increased simply because the parents smoke)
Every child should have a right to a mother and father when it comes to adoption, why do you think some children should have that and others have less when it comes to adopting out children?
Children are not commodities.
We do not use “supply and demand” when it comes to adopting children, if the demand for healthy heterosexual parents adopting children goes down, while the supply of children remains or increases, we should not lower the standards for adoption (price level) when it comes to adopting out children.
Children should have a right to a mother and father, if the demand doesn’t meet the supply than you should not reduce the price of adoption, the price being the standards for adoption, the standards of children having a right to a mother and father.
Thank you for reading
Josh
