I would be very interested indeed to read anything official (encyclical, letter etc.) that states the religious life and priesthood are superior vocations. I did do a search but could not come up with anything, only three links I think that were Catholic reputable sites but not official statements from Rome - and these three sites stated that there is no’superior’ vocation. I will post these links if anyone is interested.
But something from Rome would settle and decide the matter in my mind anyway.
Blessings and Peace - Barb
Pius XII, in his 1954 Encyclical, “
Sacra Virginitas”, paragraph 32, stated the following:
“This doctrine of the excellence of virginity and of celibacy and of their superiority over the married state was, as We have already said, revealed by our Divine Redeemer and by the Apostle of the Gentiles; so too, it was solemnly defined as a dogma of divine faith by the holy council of Trent, and explained in the same way by all the holy Fathers and Doctors of the Church”. In other words, Jesus taught it, St. Paul taught it, all the Fathers and Doctors of the Church taught it, and the Council of Trent made it an infallible dogma of the Church. This latter point makes me wonder how this conversation could have gotten this far to begin with. The “superiority” of celibacy is an infallible Article of Faith! In fact, if you do NOT acknowledge it, the Council of Trent anathematizes you! Ouch!
Now, Barb, that is something from Rome - does that “settle it” for you in your mind?
The fact is: there is an OBJECTIVE reality and a SUBJECTIVE reality here.
Objectively speaking, celibacy IS superior to marriage.
Subjectively speaking, however the “
superior” call for an individual is the one to which he has been called. The man or woman called to marriage who decides to become a priest or a nun has chosen the “
inferior” vocation “
subjectively” - the one he or she was not called to. The man or woman who is indeed called to marriage and who does marry, “
subjectively speaking” embraced the “
superior” call, even though “
objectively speaking” he or she has embraced a call that is “
inferior” to the call to celibacy. Does this make sense?