M
MonteRCMS
Guest
The industry has ways of removing the pollution.Yes, if you get electricity from a coal burning plant you’re still polluting the air. Thanks for the links posted above, incidentally.
Or mitigating the pollution.
The industry has ways of removing the pollution.Yes, if you get electricity from a coal burning plant you’re still polluting the air. Thanks for the links posted above, incidentally.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=13731Yes, if you get electricity from a coal burning plant you’re still polluting the air. Thanks for the links posted above, incidentally.
Yes, I’ve always been a big fan of nuclear power for that reason (cleanliness). I guess it has its own problems though.The mix of fuels used for electricity generation in the United States is changing - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Electricity Monthly Update - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Hydro and nuclear are the cleanest.
Hydro is basically all used up … no additional sources available …
Nuclear requires a masters degree.
The U.S. gets 20% of its electricity from nuclear.Yes, I’ve always been a big fan of nuclear power for that reason (cleanliness).
And Japan too is or used to be highly dependent on nuclear energy. Why the disparity? I think it’s an irrational fear of nuclear power but what the source is other than popular culture (the Simpsons, etc.) I couldn’t say. Actually I think it’s more likely that popular culture reflects that sentiment rather than generates it.The U.S. gets 20% of its electricity from nuclear.
France gets 80% of its electricity from nuclear.
Why such a huge disparity?
The problems are more hype than reality.Yes, I’ve always been a big fan of nuclear power for that reason (cleanliness). I guess it has its own problems though.
Yeah, right? It’s almost enough for me to have a bumper sticker printed up (in fact I may just quote your post on my bumper sticker if that’s all right).The problems are more hype than reality.
I’ll know the world is serious about controlling CO2 when they go big on nuclear.
https://www.engadget.com/2017/08/28/thorium-reactor-experiment/
Japan had ~ 52 nuclear reactors, but owing to blind panic, shut all of them down after the earthquake/ tidal wave in 2011. About nine have been restarted so far.And Japan too is or used to be highly dependent on nuclear energy. Why the disparity? I think it’s an irrational fear of nuclear power but what the source is other than popular culture (the Simpsons, etc.) I couldn’t say. Actually I think it’s more likely that popular culture reflects that sentiment rather than generates it.
Virtually all of the related deaths came from evacuating people instead of sheltering in place.Japan had ~ 52 nuclear reactors, but owing to blind panic, shut all of them down after the Fukushima earthquake/tidal wave. About nine have been restarted.
A May 2012 United Nations committee report stated that _none of the six Fukushima workers who had died_* since the tsunami had died from radiation exposure. According to a 2012 Yomiuri Shimbun survey, 573 deaths have been certified as “disaster-related” by 13 municipalities affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.Virtually all of the related deaths came from evacuating people instead of sheltering in place.
The disparity results because France decided not to be dependent on the Mid-East for energy any further.The U.S. gets 20% of its electricity from nuclear.
France gets 80% of its electricity from nuclear.
Why such a huge disparity?
They have deep underground storage. Nuclear produces far lest waste than any other form of power generation, including solar.One wonders what France does with its nuclear waste. Must be a lot of it. They used to dump it at sea around French Polynesia. Then I believe they shipped it to Russia to be buried in some secret place nobody knew much about. I don’t know what they do with it now. I think they just put it in temporary storage pending some kind of deep underground thing.
I thought they and the Japanese had found some way of safely recycling and reusing it? Sounds too good to be true, I know.One wonders what France does with its nuclear waste. Must be a lot of it. They used to dump it at sea around French Polynesia. Then I believe they shipped it to Russia to be buried in some secret place nobody knew much about. I don’t know what they do with it now. I think they just put it in temporary storage pending some kind of deep underground thing.
I don’t follow this comment, Europe has significantly increased their wood pellet imports because it is ‘green’It is easy to argue against wood when no one is arguing for it.