College conservatives branded 'hate group' for refusing LGBT sensitivity training

  • Thread starter Thread starter gam197
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gam197

Guest
foxnews.com/us/2015/03/09/college-conservatives-branded-hate-group-for-refusing-lgbt-sensitivity-training/?intcmp

A conservative student group at a Washington, DC, college has been branded a “hate group” and fears it could lose its funding for refusing to take part in gay, lesbian and transgender-oriented sensitivity training…

Allied in Pride, a campus LGBT group, told The College Fix Young America’s Foundation is guilty of “intolerance and a pattern of hate” for inviting former Sen. Rick Santorum, a conservative Republican, to speak. The group also stated the conservative club’s funding should be revoked.
 
What I find sad is that there has to be sensitivity classes. Like, what happened to treating people how you want to be treated?
 
Yes, this “hate group” mentality will be one of the strongest or currently is the strongest tactic against people who stand for what is right regarding homosexuality.

We need to develop an apologetic framework so we can point out the holes in this comparison.

Don’t think it should be too hard. Is a choice to live a homosexual lifestyle really the same thing as being black or asian or Jewish? If we can’t argue against this notion, then we are in hot water.

Unfortunately moral relativism has dug in deeply in the U.S. as well as all around the world.

The whole scenario is starting to remind me of the book of Revelation.
 
Yes, this “hate group” mentality will be one of the strongest or currently is the strongest tactic against people who stand for what is right regarding homosexuality…
This and anti-bullying laws being twisted into targeting Christians for saying that homosexual behavior is sinful. Under the control of militant gays and anit-Christs the anti-bullying definition of exactly what ‘bullying’ is can be stretched to include any moral ‘judgementalism’ they see.
 
It’s Orwellian Newspeak. If you disagree with something, anything, then you hate. It’s absurd to us now, but younger generations will fall right in line. It will seem natural and self-evident to them.
 
It’s Orwellian Newspeak. If you disagree with something, anything, then you hate. It’s absurd to us now, but younger generations will fall right in line. It will seem natural and self-evident to them.
It’s not absurd to a continually growing number. I think that side will become the majority.
 
Perhaps the conservative students group could offer some sensitivity training on how to be sensitive to young Christian conservatives. Might be helpful.
 
What I find sad is that there has to be sensitivity classes. Like, what happened to treating people how you want to be treated?
I think what’s worse is that it’s all one-sided…If you disagree with someone’s lifestyle then it’s called hate. We’ve lost the true meaning of what hate really is…People need to check out what’s happening to Christians in other countries and watch some documentaries of Adolph Hitler’s concentration camps…that’s is pure unadulterated hate…
 
Demographics are on OUR side after all.
What about on college campuses? :bigyikes:

What’s that famous quotation again?

"Give me license, or give me death." hmmm…no. That doesn’t sound quite right. 🤷
 
If the majority can be convinced that homosexuality is indeed not a choice but simply the way you were born and a human freedom that ought to be championed, I think we are in trouble.

If this is believed to be true, then essentially this group is not different from other minorities that have been oppressed throughout history.
 
I think what’s worse is that it’s all one-sided…If you disagree with someone’s lifestyle then it’s called hate. We’ve lost the true meaning of what hate really is…People need to check out what’s happening to Christians in other countries and watch some documentaries of Adolph Hitler’s concentration camps…that’s is pure unadulterated hate…
Maybe it is because every place I have ever lived has been quite conservative, but I have never been hated on for my beliefs. It truly shocks some Christians that I’m even more relaxed on the whole gay thing. See, I grew up being taught homosexuals are going to hell. You like the opposite sex or burn, baby! It was an eye opener to learn what the Catholic Church teaches. Finding the same sex attractive doesn’t give you a one way ticket to hell!
So, in some places I see a lot of discrimination that doesn’t seem very just towards gays. if I was told even liking someone was going to make me burn, what’s going to stop me from acting on those feelings, ya know?
 
I think what’s worse is that it’s all one-sided…If you disagree with someone’s lifestyle then it’s called hate. We’ve lost the true meaning of what hate really is…People need to check out what’s happening to Christians in other countries and watch some documentaries of Adolph Hitler’s concentration camps…that’s is pure unadulterated hate…
Agreed. I’m sick of it. In my opinion, this has gotten so out of hand it’s irritating and frightening. The whole world has gone batty. This must be the worst time we’ve ever lived in, as far as our current “issues” go. Just look at all of the threads in the news and social sections on this board? Abortion, same-sex, etc. It’s all you ever hear about anymore. I don’t remember it being this way just ten or more years ago.
 
See, I grew up being taught homosexuals are going to hell. You like the opposite sex or burn, baby! It was an eye opener to learn what the Catholic Church teaches. Finding the same sex attractive doesn’t give you a one way ticket to hell!
I don’t believe same-sex attraction sends a person to hell. The sin is in acting on it. And even in the case of sinning, it isn’t for us to judge, only God. He sees the heart. But He isn’t all marshmallowy either. You need to understand (not you in particular, I mean people in general) that there needs to be some understanding and respect for what is right and what is wrong. Our culture seems to be striving to make wrong things “right,” and they just never will be able to attain it. They’re only fooling themselves. If we do this, where is the line drawn? Why not just start demanding that siblings can “marry” too, just because they have "feelings’’ for each other? Where would it ever end if we just let everyone do everything they wanted? There needs to be discipline. And no one seems to understand that. I just don’t understand why and never will. They don’t want to listen. They close their minds and use words such as “haters” and “bigots,” etc., and whine that we call them names? :rolleyes:
 
I don’t believe same-sex attraction sends a person to hell. The sin is in acting on it. And even in the case of sinning, it isn’t for us to judge, only God. He sees the heart. But He isn’t all marshmallowy either. You need to understand (not you in particular, I mean people in general) that there needs to be some understanding and respect for what is right and what is wrong. Our culture seems to be striving to make wrong things “right,” and they just never will be able to attain it. They’re only fooling themselves. If we do this, where is the line drawn? Why not just start demanding that siblings can “marry” too, just because they have "feelings’’ for each other? Where would it ever end if we just let everyone do everything they wanted? There needs to be discipline. And no one seems to understand that. I just don’t understand why and never will. They don’t want to listen. They close their minds and use words such as “haters” and “bigots,” etc., and whine that we call them names? :rolleyes:
This wasn’t the point I was trying to make. You went from agreeing to church teaching to talking about siblings marrying.
 
I wonder what exactly their problem was with the sensitivity training. I mean, did they think that learning to be sensitive to a gay person’s feelings was going to a) send them to hell or b) turn them gay? It’s utter nonsense. Kendra was right: we really shouldn’t need classes to teach us the golden rule.
 
They close their minds and use words such as “haters” and “bigots,” etc., and whine that we call them names? :rolleyes:
I went to the Fox link and found this astonishing, mind-boggling piece of absurdity:
“…their refusal to use **preferred gender pronouns **should be considered an act of violence”!!!

Hold on, WHO decided these unwords are pronouns, let alone “preferred”?

SUBJECT PRONOUN, OBJECT PRN, POSSESSIVE PRN, REFLEXIVE PRONOUN
____ is an activist. I am proud of _____. That is _____ book. -or
That book is _____. That person likes _____.

She her her/hers herself
He him his himself
Ze* hir hir/hirs hirself
Ze* zir zir/zirs zirself
E or Ey em eir/eirs eirself or emself
Per per per/pers Perself
Hu hum hus/hus Humself
They (are)** them their/theirs Themselves

*Additional alternate spellings for “ze” are “zie”, “sie”, “xie”, and “xe.”
** more and more people are using “they”, “them”, and “their(s)” as singular, gender inclusive pronouns
from: www.gsafewi.org/wp-content/uploads/What-the-heck-is-a-PGP1.pdf

The above is sheer intellectual Bolshevism. Not only are they destroying the whole moral structure of Western Civilization, they are replacing it with a snarky newspeak. What the Heck, indeed, and they are calling it “Safe”???**
 
An why do the “sensitivity trainers” have the arrogance to claim they speak on behalf of the entire lgbt community anyway? I would turn the argument around on them.

It is terrible how society is at the mercy of lobby groups. Who are they do define what sensitivity or normalcy is?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top