H
HarryStotle
Guest
So people are free to grow or acquire food where they wish. They are not compelled by the State to buy and sell in completely controlled markets. Nothing is forcing them not to buy from the multinationals, but they can purchase locally or grow their own? Nice to have that option in a free market economy.HarryStotle:
The competition is in large part self-manufactured, given how many food companies are ultimately owned by a handful of multinationals.Balto1:
Why, then, is it NOT equally “disgusting” to treat food as a consumer good? Everyone needs food everyday, and in substantive quantity.Nah, it’s the profit motive, treating health care like a consumer good is disgusting. Paying people to sit around all day playing video games and occasionally strangle someone is as effective a use of money as paying them to deny insurance claims.
Yet it is the very fact that food is a consumer good that enables the quantity and variety of foods available in free market economies. The competition and consistent market ensures supply, demand and competition.
Again, we could point to the socialization of BOTH food and health care in Venezuela — which at one time, before socialism ravaged the country, was the wealthiest nation in South America — as a pointed example of what happens when a small group of political ideologues control access and supply.
The competition in relation to food is also in large part possible because a lot of people are capable of growing or making a lot of foods themselves and so removing themselves from the market altogether. Therefore cheap prices are the only thing keeping them buying ready made food from the stores. This is not something that is true of healthcare.