A
ALLFORHIM
Guest
Right back at yaI know the song
Thanks ALL, you are a blessing!
Point of Grace is my favorite christian group:thumbsup:
Right back at yaI know the song
Thanks ALL, you are a blessing!
Well in a sense your right it is probably not good enough, but dont you think Christ would want us to embrace the commonalities and then just discuss(without nastiness)the differences?Very good yâall! What I want to know is what if Catholic wasnât good enough for Luther, than why isnât Lutheran good enough for Baptist, which isnât good enough for Pentecostals, which isnât good enough for Church of Christ, which isnât good enough for Unitarian??? I guess we all just believe in Jesus, which is good enough! NOT!
I somewhat disagree with this, The Catholic Church has dogmatically defined Abortion and ABC as grave evils, this can never be changed and it will last until the second coming, how can you be more anti-abortion and anti-birth control than that?Not exactly so.
Barna did some research on this very topic:
barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=94
If you match up Protestants generally with Catholics, the views are similar.
If you match up those who identify themselves as Evangelical Christians with Catholics, then the Evangelicals are far more pro-life than Catholics.
Interesting to me.
Denominationally, I think that is so, but I also think that what actually is the reality is more important. It would seem strange to be the case, but more Catholics support ABC than Protestants.
Just an aside on the threadâŚbut it does go to show we are even very similar in these areas.
âŚ
We have a lot in common, may I suggest that all who are participating in this thread read the follow links. The first one was given to me by my protestant pastor just before I came in full communion with the Catholic Church. Though I am very much Catholic now I havenât given up my friendships and associations with my protestant brothers and sisters. We do find common ground and it is based on the love of and through Christ.Letâs share what we have in common if thatâs okay with everyoneâŚbeside the obvious of we both believe Jesus is our Lord and Savior. What else is there?
Other statementsby: Various
We together pray for the fulfillment of the prayer of Our Lord: "May they all be one; as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, so also may they be in us, that the world may believe that you sent me.
May 1994
Just a word of caution to others regarding the editor-in-chief (Fr Neuhaus) of your first reference - First Things (i.e. not the referenced article, but the publication in general as regards this topic - which it devotes a lot of print space to, probably itâs number one topic) . The New Oxford Review has challenged him on his - letâs call it over-zealousness - in regard to ecumenism with our separated brethren. His responses to that criticism have been weak, to say the least. For a start on that legitimate criticism you can go to newoxfordreview.org/note.jsp?did=0704-notes-rejectionWe have a lot in common, may I suggest that all who are participating in this thread read the follow links.
Evangelicals & Catholics Together: The Christian Mission in the Third Millennium
Is that all that the catholic church is about Manny? According to your quote above we donât have common ground because protestants ignore Mary âfor the most partâ (whatever this means). If this is the only thing that keeps us from having common ground does this mean that is all you concentrate on in the catholic church?There is no common ground. The only common ground that Catholic have are those with the Eastern Orthodox.
Protestants for the most part ignore Mary.
I think you are refering to every detail of dotting the i and crossing the t.Well in a sense your right it is probably not good enough, but dont you think Christ would want us to embrace the commonalities and then just discuss(without nastiness)the differences?
I cant find it but their is a verse that talks about the fact that we will not agree on all aspects of our faith. I think it is in the OT but maybe not and that is why I cant find it:blush: It has something to do with Jot and tittle or something like thatâanyone know?
Manny you might find this article interesting.There is no common ground. The only common ground that Catholic have are those with the Eastern Orthodox.
Protestants for the most part ignore Mary.
Of course we must use discerment in all that we do, but I have been to able get a few of my protestant brothers to start carrying Hail Mary prayer cards and to read Hail, Holy Queen by Scott Hahn.[
](http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=5417&var_recherche=mary)by Timothy George[
](http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=5417&var_recherche=mary)Copyright (c) 2007 First Things (February 2007).
It is time for evangelicals to recover a fully biblical appreciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary and her role in the history of salvation-and to do so precisely as evangelicals. The question, of course, is how to do that. Can the evangelical reengagement with the wider Christian tradition include a place for Mary? Can we, without forsaking any of the evangelical essentials, including the great solas of the Reformation, echo Elizabethâs acclamation, âBlessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb!â (Luke 1:42), or resonate with the Spirit-filled maid of the Magnificat: âMy soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, for he has looked on the humble estate of his servant. For behold, from now on, all generations will call me blessedâ (Luke 1:46-48)?
Certainly, there is growing evidence of fascination with Mary among evangelical Protestants. Many evangelicals, including a number of Southern Baptists, have begun to observe the liturgical season of Advent, which has led them to ponder more deeply the role of Mary in the history of salvation. In December 2004, I wrote for Christianity Today on âThe Blessed Evangelical Mary,â which drew a strong, mostly positive response. Evangelical scholars have begun to write books about Mary, with two volumes, Tim Perryâs Mary for Evangelicals and Scot McKnightâs The Real Mary, appearing just this past year. More
the way it actually is, is what is inside of the can determines what it should be labeled.well thanks for including me in your labeling
Im glad Im classified, and stuck on your shelf. Makes it easier to deal with things making them all neat and tidy, labels turned out in order.
But, do you ever read whats inside, or open up the cans and look? See what makes up the contents??
If you follow your labels of the different churches, the sterotypical labels youve applied do nothing for the unity of Christiandom.
Perhaps we could try the same list but lets use race instead, then say they all should be white as its meant to be.
That ought to get the unity ball rolling.![]()
We both agree Mary is very blessed.Letâs share what we have in common if thatâs okay with everyoneâŚbeside the obvious of we both believe Jesus is our Lord and Savior. What else is there?
Thanks for the article, but I think Fr Neuhaus wouldnât have converted to the Catholic Church if he didnât believe that is the ultimate need of all in the long run and his idea of ecumenism is based on short term goals of Christian unity, in order to work together on political and social concerns, not to be confused with watering down the faith of Catholics - I could be wrong. One thing I keep in mind is my own conversion to the Catholic Church - which I believe was prompt by God to my understanding of His will in my life and how He used a protestant minister to tell me I just may be right to do so. which I know without doubt I had no other choice, if I was to follow Godâs will.Just a word of caution to others regarding the editor-in-chief (Fr Neuhaus) of your first reference - First Things (i.e. not the referenced article, but the publication in general as regards this topic - which it devotes a lot of print space to, probably itâs number one topic) . The New Oxford Review has challenged him on his - letâs call it over-zealousness - in regard to ecumenism with our separated brethren. His responses to that criticism have been weak, to say the least. For a start on that legitimate criticism you can go to newoxfordreview.org/note.jsp?did=0704-notes-rejection
On all other topics, I have found Fr Neihausâs opining to be very enlightening and I profit greatly from listening to him and reading him.
I see what you are saying but the poster I responded to clearly said this:I somewhat disagree with this, The Catholic Church has dogmatically defined Abortion and ABC as grave evils, this can never be changed and it will last until the second coming, how can you be more anti-abortion and anti-birth control than that?
Well, picking and choosing the Catholics and Protestants that we personally approve of only serves to pad the results in opposition to finding out the reality in the streets. I am sure that you may choose every pro-life Catholic you can find to be the only ones to answer that poll, but the truth would clearly just fly out of the window.If youre talking about individuals, maybe this may be true, but we must take into account Catholics that dont practice their faith, I wouldnt consider them authentic Catholics, and their views would be invalid in my opinion
Though I find myself in agreement with you on the overwhelming majority of your posts - I do think you are wrong on this one. I only linked the one New Oxford Review article. There were many - including back-and-forth responses between the NOR and First Things/Fr Neuhaus. (Some printed in one or the other - and referred to in both).You might want to read them yourself.Thanks for the article, but I think Fr Neuhaus wouldnât have converted to the Catholic Church if he didnât believe that is the ultimate need of all in the long run and his idea of ecumenism is based on short term goals of Christian unity, in order to work together on political and social concerns, not to be confused with watering down the faith of Catholics - I could be wrong.
I still donât see how this excuses a statement such as your earlier one: âA only good Protestant is an Ex-Protestant turn Catholic.âYes but I desire Protestants to be Catholic. Why? Because Catholics are the ORIGINAL Christians.
That is not true at all Manny. Your generalizations arenât doing your credibility any good. Check up on Anglican church doctrine. Where do we say Mary is now and what is she??There is no common ground. The only common ground that Catholic have are those with the Eastern Orthodox.
Protestants for the most part ignore Mary.
Hogwash.Protestants for the most part ignore Mary.
Well put and you are accurate!Hogwash.
This is incredibleâŚ