"communicatio in sacris"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monica4316
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As in my “meet and great” post, I am closed completely to the novel heresies that contradict the timeless, infallible, teaching of the Holy Roman Church.
“Heresies” introduced by those who sit upon the Chair of Peter. Which means you’re coming close to becoming what you hate.
 
Another question; can you attend Protestant weddings or Protestant Funerals?

Could my wife attend her mother’s Protestant funeral?
The Church has always taught it is acceptable to attend the funeral services and weddings of our close friends, relatives, and even public officials. Active participation though, in a non-Catholic wedding is forbidden, i.e. acting as a best-man or bridesmaid.
 
Another question; can you attend Protestant weddings or Protestant Funerals?
No more than one at a time, unless they’re in the same place at the same time. [Aristotle, Declaration on corporeal unity and temporal indivisibility 3, 18]
Could my wife attend her mother’s Protestant funeral?
Not if your wife passes first, except in spirit. [Aquinas, On the temporality of life on earth and the separation of body and soul after death 4, 17]
 
No more than one at a time, unless they’re in the same place at the same time. [Aristotle, Declaration on corporeal unity and temporal indivisibility 3, 18]

Not if your wife passes first, except in spirit. [Aquinas, On the temporality of life on earth and the separation of body and soul after death 4, 17]
I don’t understand the answers to those questions.
 
“Heresies” introduced by those who sit upon the Chair of Peter. Which means you’re coming close to becoming what you hate.
**
St. Thomas Aquinas** (Summa Theologica)
“Now sometimes the things commanded by a superior are against God, therefore superiors are not to be obeyed in all things.”
*
**
Galatians 1:8
*
“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.”
 
No more than one at a time, unless they’re in the same place at the same time. [Aristotle, Declaration on corporeal unity and temporal indivisibility 3, 18]

Not if your wife passes first, except in spirit. [Aquinas, On the temporality of life on earth and the separation of body and soul after death 4, 17]
I don’t understand the answers to those questions.
They were said in jest, referring to the metaphysical properties of matter and spirit.
 
**
St. Thomas Aquinas** (Summa Theologica)
“Now sometimes the things commanded by a superior are against God, therefore superiors are not to be obeyed in all things.”
*
**
Galatians 1:8
*
“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.”
Whatever you bind on earth…

He who hears you hears me…
 
So now your going assume the Protestant practice of Scriptural dichotomy?
 
**
St. Thomas Aquinas** (Summa Theologica)
“Now sometimes the things commanded by a superior are against God, therefore superiors are not to be obeyed in all things.”
*
**
Galatians 1:8
*
“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.”
I love Aquinas, but until he wears a fun looking hat and drives a cool car he’s not infallible.

Scripture is great, especially when it says to hold onto what you are taught from those in authority, and how we should respect religious leaders.
 
So now your going assume the Protestant practice of Scriptural dichotomy?
How about the Catholic practice of following the Vicar of Christ on earth?
I love Aquinas, but until he wears a fun looking hat and drives a cool car he’s not infallible.

Scripture is great, especially when it says to hold onto what you are taught from those in authority, and how we should respect religious leaders.
👍

Scripture even goes so far as to tell us how much authority the Pope has: whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose will be loosed in heaven.
 
So now your going assume the Protestant practice of Scriptural dichotomy?
Derek, this is heading around in circles at this point. You refuse to acknowledge that Vatican II is a legitimate and binding Council, and you also think my wife should not attend her mother’s funeral. You also think that a Catholic can’t attend the funeral of their non-Catholic spouse. You also think that a Catholic can’t marry a Protestant.

The Church does say otherwise on these things. Like in Canon Law, I’ll take what they’re saying now, thanks.
 
How about the Catholic practice of following the Vicar of Christ on earth?
So you are practicing Scriptural dichotomy. I follow the Catholic practice of adhering to Papal Infallibility, which is perfectly synchronized with everything in Scripture.
 
So you are practicing Scriptural dichotomy. I follow the Catholic practice of adhering to Papal Infallibility, which is perfectly synchronized with everything in Scripture.
Like “honor thy father and they mother”? Well, except when they’re Protestant. Then you can disobey them and not show up to their funerals.
 
How about the Catholic practice of following the Vicar of Christ on earth?

👍

Scripture even goes so far as to tell us how much authority the Pope has: whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose will be loosed in heaven.
So you are practicing Scriptural dichotomy. I follow the Catholic practice of adhering to Papal Infallibility, which is perfectly synchronized with everything in Scripture.
I think you dropped something.
 
you also think my wife should not attend her mother’s funeral. You also think that a Catholic can’t attend the funeral of their non-Catholic spouse.
You might want to put some glasses on, or re-read my post without the cloud of subjectivity in your eyes.
The Church has always taught it is acceptable to attend the funeral services and weddings of our close friends, relatives, and even public officials. Active participation though, in a non-Catholic wedding is forbidden, i.e. acting as a best-man or bridesmaid.
 
You might want to put some glasses on, or re-read my post without the cloud of subjectivity in your eyes.
I did read that, but since you reject Vatican II and the writings that took place during the last forty years I assumed you rejected that statement as well.

Really, we can say you’re capable of rejecting anything from any Pope or Council at this point. Not saying you do, but you’re capable of doing so since you have with Vatican II.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top