Communion givers must hate me

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nap66
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Absolutely, the Eucharist is the predominant reason why I’m a Catholic. The Holy Sacrifice of the mass is something I could not imagine being without. I left the church from 18 to 25 (i.e. went to mass only a few times a year) and was thus a revert so when I met someone who wasn’t Catholic, it didn’t cause me to stray in my faith as it makes me appreciate it more. I don’t take my Catholic faith for granted.

I agree. I have only once abstained from Catholic communion and there are countless times where I was unsure whether I had committed a venial or mortal sin. There was one time where I was certain and unfortunately it took me 3-5 weeks to make it to the confessional and so I was finally able to take the Eucharist again which was such a huge blessing. My mortal sin was my deliberate attempt to make my fiance jealous.
Please keep in mind that the “Eucharist” is more than the Blessed Sacrament. It’s the celebration of the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ to His Father. So many seem not to understand just how important it is to be at Mass – to be suffused with the grace stemming from the Sacrifice and not simply to receive Holy Communion.
 
Very true. I think that this grace we are to have received is something that we forget about unless we’re actively thinking about what it means and what he did for us thru the power of the Holy Spirit.

I don’t agree that Catholics haven’t heard about being saved. We hear about it in the Nicene Creed. We also hear about it a lot on Catholic retreats. And some priests do a better job at others at reminding us at least indirectly about Jesus being the atonement of our sins on the Cross.

I think God does forgive those who truly don’t understand what the communion means but when one does so out of disobedience or out of willful ignorance, it’s a different matter. He still likely forgives but he probably weeps in the same way that he weeps for the prodigal son (while he’s in a state of sin). And when we’re in a state of sin, we are at risk of going to Hell for eternity which is a scary concept and why missing mass is the first step off the ledge.

Protestants believe that one is in a state of sin only before they are saved. That said, a Protestant sometimes will say that some people who were saved were not really saved. I think they’re trying to avoid the belief that you can lose your salvation and that once saved, always saved. They don’t want to admit that charity or your ability to forgive others is the fruit of one’s salvation and that the fruit matters. What ultimately matters is what’s in your heart but the fruits of your salvation can help you understand if your heart is truly genuine and holy.
 
Last edited:
Alter servers aren’t required strictly speaking. However, allowing girls to serve is a vital service to the priests who rely on them.
EMsHC are definitely not an “integral” part of the OF Mass. By definition they are extraordinary, although their overuse is quite common. Ideally they wouldn’t be used at all.

Providing altar servers to serve the OF Mass is an important service to the celebrant. That doesn’t necessitate that females be allowed to serve, but they are and that’s that – at least for now.
 
Very true. I think that this grace we are to have received is something that we forget about unless we’re actively thinking about what it means and what he did for us thru the power of the Holy Spirit.

I don’t agree that Catholics haven’t heard about being saved. We hear about it in the Nicene Creed. We also hear about it a lot on Catholic retreats. And some priests do a better job at others at reminding us at least indirectly about Jesus being the atonement of our sins on the Cross.
It’s not up to me or you. It’s up to the Church and it does not teach that its adherents are “saved” (or lost) during their temporal time here on Earth as that would be usurping God’s final judgement of our souls. The Catholic teaching is that we are redeemed – the road to Heaven has been opened by the Blood of Christ, but it’s still up to us whether or not we choose to take the high road and how successful we are in doing so.
 
Last edited:
As far as I can tell – at least with respect to the OF in the U.S. – this USCCB Newsletter of January 2012 would appear to suggest that stand and hand are absolutely okay?!

Mebbe even quasi-normal… 😁
 
Last edited:
Now that I’m back at church, everyone seems to take communion in their hands. I still stick out my tongue.
Then they’ll wish the altar servers were there with the little metal plate under my chin
There is a church that my family and I go to sometimes. There you must receive the Holy Eucharist on the tongue. They also use those little metal plates to make sure the Eucharist doesn’t fall on the floor. This is a sign of great respect that we don’t see often in other churches anymore.
 
Communion givers must hate me
I don’t think that the “Communion givers” hate you, it is just that they probably don’t give the Eucharist to many people on the tongue or they don’t know how.
 
It’s not up to me or you. It’s up to the Church and it does not teach that its adherents are “saved” (or lost) during their temporal time here on Earth as that would be usurping God’s final judgement of our souls. The Catholic teaching is that we are redeemed – the road to Heaven has been opened by the Blood of Christ, but it’s still up to us whether we take it or not we choose to take the high road and how successful we are in doing so.
I think I agree with your point that humans attempting to define how we are saved does usurp God’s final judgment. Whether Evangelical Christians are correct that we say a prayer that will lead to our direct conversion or in the Catholic whether we attempt to make our life of conversion only to complete it in purgatory or some other way is up to God and his divine authority. All I hope for is that I will have a conversion of heart and be humble and willing to repent my sins not only at one time for their forgiveness (which for Catholics is at baptism) but all the time and be given the will to know what mortal sins I may have committed so that I can repent these too and not be afraid to ask for forgiveness of these sins. I also hope to continue to forgive people and improve how I forgive people and be more charitable as I can be a glutton, a scrooge, and even envious. I can forgive people I know, even my enemy, but may commit the sin of wrath for some group half way around the world. It’s so frustrating how easy it is to sin. Just a water given to a thirsty man can be adequate to get to heaven or an acknowledgement of one’s sins at time of death or the second prior to death.

That said, our works don’t get us to heaven at least not by a scale. Our works that outflow from our salvation do get us into heaven. Our works from the Holy Spirit get us to heaven. Someone could have only one good work and go to heaven whereas someone else could have had more good works than bad works yet go to Hell. God’s divine providence determines whom is Holy and who makes it into purgatory or those who don’t make it. Purgatory means we’ve made it to Heaven and are simply making reparations for our sin here on Earth.

Dear St Michael: pray for all those souls who need your protection, who need your redirection. Pray for them to turn to God and that they will not bring others into sin and eternal damnation.

St Michael Prayer: St Michael the Archangel. Defend us in battle. Keep us protection against the wickedness and snares of the Devil. May God rebuke him we humbly pray. And to thou the prince of the Heavenly Host. By the power of God, thrust into Hell Satan and all the evil spirits who prowl around/about the world seeking the ruin of souls. Amen

Fatima Prayer: Oh my Jesus. Forgive us our sins. Save us from the fires of hell. Lead all souls to heaven, especially those who have most need of thy (your) mercy.
 
Last edited:
I think I agree with your point that humans attempting to define how we are saved does usurp God’s final judgment. Whether Evangelical Christians are correct that we say a prayer that will lead to our direct conversion or in the Catholic whether we attempt to make our life of conversion only to complete it in purgatory or some other way is up to God and his divine authority.
First, if our souls make it to Purgatory, they’ll spend eternity in Heaven. Purgatory is not part of our “conversion.” Lost souls go directly to Hell. All that said, the notion of being “saved” here on Earth is a foreign, man-made tradition in the eyes of Catholicism, Orthodoxy and parts of Protestantism.
That said, our works don’t get us to heaven at least not by a scale. Our works that outflow from our salvation do get us into heaven. Our works from the Holy Spirit get us to heaven. Someone could have only one good work and go to heaven whereas someone else could have had more good works than bad works yet go to Hell. God’s divine providence determines whom is Holy and who makes it into purgatory or those who don’t make it. Purgatory means we’ve made it to Heaven and are simply making reparations for our sin here on Earth.
Salvation is strictly through the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ to His Father for our sins. However, following Jesus Christ in our temporal lives will necessarily result in good works. So no, our good works do not get us to heaven, but the total absence of them is a product of not following Jesus Christ and the consequences that come with that.
 
Last edited:
There is a church that my family and I go to sometimes. There you must receive the Holy Eucharist on the tongue. They also use those little metal plates to make sure the Eucharist doesn’t fall on the floor. This is a sign of great respect that we don’t see often in other churches anymore.
While their sign value is appreciated, those communion patens do more harm than good in practice in my experience.
 
Last edited:
First, if our souls make it to Purgatory, they’ll spend eternity in Heaven. Purgatory is not part of our “conversion.” Lost souls go directly to Hell. All that said, the notion of being “saved” here on Earth is a foreign, man-made tradition in the eyes of Catholicism, Orthodoxy and parts of Protestantism.

whichwaytogo47:
Trying to learn something new everyday. Thanks for the heads up. I was thinking that people in purgatory started their conversion journey here - it was unfinished and they weren’t lost souls (thankfully) as they’re going to spend an eternity in heaven - praise the Lord.
Salvation is strictly through the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ to His Father for our sins. However, following Jesus Christ in our temporal lives will necessarily result in good works. So no, our good works do not get us to heaven, but the total absence of them is a product of not following Jesus Christ and the consequences that come with that.
I agree with this too. Thanks for taking the time to reply. I am glad that following God can lead to good works. I am glad that it can get us to do the right things for our neighbor. Thanks for your help - it’s so appreciated.
 
Yikes, this thread is kind of frightening. A lot of accusatory remarks. I will say, though, I much prefer receiving on the tongue. To know that the saints all received on the tongue as well- it’s a good feeling.
 
Last edited:
Why do you think that it does more harm than good?
From observation. An adult holding a paten (or better yet a folded corporal) right under someone’s chin is one thing. A kid trying to maneuver a communion paten at the end of a long stick is something entirely different. They’re largely for show.
 
Yikes, this thread is kind of frightening. A lot of accusatory remarks. I will say, though, I much prefer receiving on the tongue. To know that the saints all received on the tongue as well- it’s a good feeling.
But the fact is they did not, particularly in the early church.
 
I’m sorry, but this part is nonsense. Kids are virtually clueless about the Eucharist.

And there are plenty of adults who, through no fault of their own, have little more than the same as a child’s understanding of the Eucharist.
You are wrong. First not all kids are ignorant about the Blessed Sacrament. Not by a long shot.

The distributor of the sacrament says “The Body of Christ” and we respond “amen” (I agree) or we go without. If we really don’t know what that means, or if we don’t agree with it then we shouldn’t be receiving until we do.

“Kids” who have not been prepared to receive first holy communion should not. Further, those that have been through a preparation process at their parishes and remain “virtually clueless about the Eucharist” should also not present themselves for Holy Communion. It’s gravely wrong for them to do otherwise until they know what’s going on.

While the lion’s share of the responsibility in preparing children to receive Holy Communion rests with the pastor, cathechists, sponsors and parents, in the case of adults a great deal also rests on the shoulders of the individual communicants. If they “are virtually clueless about the Eucharist” they should seek some quality cathechesis before receiving again.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I didn’t mean all saints. A majority would be better wording.

However, technically, early Christians never received the Eucharist in the hands (bare). They would carry a cloth in their hands and the priest would place the host on the cloth- because they felt it was too sacred to touch. They believed only the priest could touch the host.

When they switched to receiving it on the tongue, it became the norm. Only in times of persecution was a layperson allowed to touch the host or administer the host to themselves.
 
Sorry, I didn’t mean all saints. A majority would be better wording.

However, technically, early Christians never received the Eucharist in the hands (bare). They would carry a cloth in their hands and the priest would place the host on the cloth- because they felt it was too sacred to touch. They believed only the priest could touch the host.

When they switched to receiving it on the tongue, it became the norm. Only in times of persecution was a layperson allowed to touch the host or administer the host to themselves.
Again, simply not true. Do you have any proof to share? What you describe may have been true in limited cases, but I can think of plenty where it is not. Also, from a purely logical standpoint why is it OK for a priest to hold the Blessed Sacrament (keep in mind that the hands of Eastern Catholic and Orthodox priests are not anointed) and/or for a layperson to hold it when using a cloth? What is the function of the cloth? It simply makes no sense.

This thread really concerns me. There are people struggling to prove that their chosen way to receive communion is somehow “better” than the other way and that’s simply impossible to do and it’s very divisive. People should just choose a way (so long as it’s approved where they live) and be content rather than trying to justify their choice.
 
I had a little chuckle as I too have experienced the same when recieving communion on the tongue. I take all steps in making sure I am in the priests line and not EM’s.

The occassional time, when the priest pauses for a second or two. I think this is because he is in a ‘roll’ in giving out communion.

Welcome home Nap66!

THT
 
I don’t recall where I heard it; it was awhile ago that I discovered this information. I can do some more digging but honestly I don’t know if I’ll be able to find it again, sadly.

To my knowledge, the cloth would have been used because lay people were not to the touch the Eucharist. Only priests.

It is a known fact that communion in the hand did come from disobedience. This is true. This makes communion in the hand an exception, but not the rule. Communion on the tongue is still the universal way of the Church as it has been for many years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top