N
Nicholas_Larkin
Guest
In your own mind, what would you consider “common” liturgical abuses? How would you present these abuses to your priest?
Just yesterday I emailed to our priest, as a question a problem I have been encountering the past 3 or 4 weeks were the cantor has changed the wording of the Agnus Dei…The changing of this chant is prohibited in the GIRM…
- Encouraging the holding of hands at the our Father
- Changing words in the Sacramentary when there is no option to do so, especially for inclusive language (when is the last time you have heard Eucharistic Prayer IV prayed as written?)
- Talking before or after Mass
- EEM’s handling the Eucharist without proper reverence.
- Anthropocentric music.
- The priest leaving the sanctuary during Mass.
- Poorly-catechized permanent deacons.
- Inventing new and unusual liturgical actions, like dance.
- Allowing the Sign of Peace to last for more than three seconds.
- Referring to God as “mother.”
You should see the congregation at the parish I attended here in Fort Lauderdale. There was so many handmovements I though I was with the Shakers and not the Catholics!!!I agree especially with number 1 above…The holding hands/armwaving has gotten out of hand at some churches I have visited…
I feel your pain and agree with your point where you remind your daughter that she knows better…As I watch the hand holding and raising the hands high I say a little prayer to myself for those people that in some way they can remember that our focus should be on Christ and the Mass that is unfolding before us instead of the “feel good” they are getting from holding hands across the pews…You should see the congregation at the parish I attended here in Fort Lauderdale. There was so many handmovements I though I was with the Shakers and not the Catholics!!!
At one point my older daughter started to do the “Backatcha” movement without thinking. I leaned down to her and said, “Stop. You know more than these people. Don’t make it about you.” Although everyone of those people may have “felt” the need to make the movements, for her it made the focus on the crowd and not Our Lord.
Even at nine, she questioned the tabernacle on the side and the procession bowing to the presider’s chair behind the altar. God Bless my Holy Parish, our wonderful Pastor and every volunteer in our CCD classes!!!![]()
.
Please be sure and remind your daughter that all this hand holding and people raising clasped hands high (even though it transformed one of the Wonder Twins into water/Ice and the other into an animal on the cartoons) will never increase or raise to a higher level the prayer you are reciting and professing with your mouth and heart…It does not change the efficacy of prayer !!!
“Wonder Twin powers activate! Form of a giant liturgist! Shape of an ice priestess!”
Gee, i r gong to skool to lurn so i kin bee smart to.IIt’s a charismatic act which has crept into the Catholic Church and sadly many are not educated about our faith enough to reject this act…
I guess they are desiring to transfer all this spiritual energy among themselves…
John,Gee, i r gong to skool to lurn so i kin bee smart to.
No, it’s not a charismatic act, and no, it has nothing to do with lack of education. You may not like it or understand the motivations of those who participate in it, but that does not make it an abuse.
And it would be far more charitable to not be making judgments about other people’s devotion, piety, or education rather than playing the part of the one standing off proclaiming “Thank you Lord for not making me like other men” as you state your great piety in looking like the picture of a saint.
I’m sure you are a loving and devoted child of God and our Church. Our faith calls us to give that same benefit of the doubt to all though.
I really don’t want to get into another debate on holding hands, as we’ve had more than enough of those here and even the moderators have asked us to give it a rest. But let’s please drop this out of the “abuse” category as it is no such thing.
Peace,
I am a bit confused. The letter’s original question was that hand holding during the Our Father was being done in place of the sign of peace. The answer is in accordance to that question. But what about when it is NOT done as a replacement? (I know the answer I am only pointing out the linked letter is not referring to other situations)All,
Please visit this link which gives a good breakdown of the point that is trying to be made here.
ewtn.com/expert/answers/holding_hands_at_mass.htm
Yes, I was fully aware of what you meant and my reply applies just as much to that as to school education. Many of us are very aware of all of those things you mention, but just find that praying in what is really the more common posture of the church at that time of the liturgy to be more meaningful. That does not mean that we look down on anyone who does not do so, but we expect not to be looked down on either.With respect to lack of education, I don’t mean completing school, degrees and if someone did or didn’t go to school… I mean an education of our faith, our mass, why were are really there
Nice, but not relevant. Saints are pictured in the context of their times and prayer cards are artist’s renditions of an ideal state that may or may not have consistently been practiced. Should we also show up in our armor and our medieval costumes so we can look like them? The fact that something was common and acceptable then (and that there is nothing wrong with now) does not mean that it is the exclusive way of doing things.What do most prayer cards that you normally see with saints on them or pictures of saints or knights in prayer look like ??? They’re not dacing in circles, holding hands with six stringers strumming in the background…
Exactly my point. Holding hands is NOT an abuse, unless it is directed to be done by some outside party. When done on personal intitiative it is a licit prayer posture which may actually by now have reached a point of actually complying with the requirements of canon law to be a “tradition”. That being said, it should never be imposed on anyone nor should anyone’s motives for not wanting to participate be questioned.The only judgement that I am making here is that abuses such as the arm waving/handholding are “Personal Initiatives”, only to please the human emotions/senses, which are not a prescribed part of the mass as outlined in the Rubrics and contradict authentic worship…Accordingly they should be rejected…
The fact that the letter specifically does not go on to say there is anything wrong with it is pretty convincing proof that it is not and was not considered an issue except in the context of trying to replace the sign of peace.I am a bit confused. The letter’s original question was that hand holding during the Our Father was being done in place of the sign of peace. The answer is in accordance to that question. But what about when it is NOT done as a replacement? (I know the answer I am only pointing out the linked letter is not referring to other situations)
I understand what you’re saying…The main thing I got out of it was about it being an introduced sign on personal initiative that was introduced and also being a sign of intimacy introduced before communion…I love the unfolding per say of the mass…John, I do acknowledge that there is not any formal rule…What worries some and I include myself is, at what point do personal initiatives get out of hand as far as the liturgy ??I am a bit confused. The letter’s original question was that hand holding during the Our Father was being done in place of the sign of peace. The answer is in accordance to that question. But what about when it is NOT done as a replacement? (I know the answer I am only pointing out the linked letter is not referring to other situations)
and I agree with you completely. I have always been a bit of a traditional kinda guy. I prefer the Liturgy as it is written without a lot “intiative” taken.I understand what you’re saying…The main thing I got out of it was about it being an introduced sign on personal initiative that was introduced and also being a sign of intimacy introduced before communion…I love the unfolding per say of the mass…John, I do acknowledge that there is not any formal rule…What worries some and I include myself is, at what point do personal initiatives get out of hand as far as the liturgy ??
I see your point as well…