Dear Ericc,
- Firstly the resurrection. The biggest mistake Biblical scholars and Christians make with the Bible is what to interpret as literal and what to interpret as figurative. The resurrection, Baha’is maintain was figurative/spiritual and not a literal event and is not to be interpreted literally. Too often, we try to interpret literally what should be taken symbolically. The Catholic Encyclopedia lists about 33 parables. Analogies, allegorical speak are everywhere in the Bible.
This is the correct interpretation we believe as it is handed down by a Manifestation of God Who has the wisdom to distinguish the literal from the symbolical.
John 16:25
Though I have been speaking figuratively, a time is coming when I will no longer use this kind of language but will tell you plainly about my Father.
Ezekial 17:1-2
The word of the L ORD came to me: 2 “Son of man, set forth an allegory and tell it to the Israelites as a parable.
Psalms 78:2
will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of old:
- Bahá’ís do not Believe in a Bodily Resurrection After the Crucifixion
“… We do not believe that there was a bodily resurrection after the Crucifixion of Christ, but that there was a time after His Ascension when His disciples perceived spiritually His true greatness and realized He was eternal in being. This is what has been reported symbolically in the New Testament and been misunderstood. His eating with His disciples after the resurrection is the same thing.”
(From a letter written on behalf of the Guardian to an individual believer, October 9, 1947)
- That the Manifestations are not in the Bible by name as false means one cannot use the Word of God to claim they are false prophets so it is mere personal opinion. But it can be cleared up by Christ on His return which we believe has happened so it’s not an issue for us we now know they were Manifestations Who taught the oneness of God.
PLEASE READ link…
- bahai-library.com/uhj_beckwith_allegations
Above link. This is another letter that goes into one thing you’ve overlooked. Baha’is only acknowledge authenticated scripture. The passage you are referring to about world peace being established was a ‘Pilgrim’s Note’ and therefore is invalid and had to be removed as it was inaccurately recorded. So it’s not what Abdul-Baha said its what someone said Abdul-Baha said and that’s two entirely different things.
The House of Justice cannot alter Scripture but it can remove pilgrim’s notes that are not authorised and this passage about world peace was wrongly inserted by the author. Abdul-Baha wrote two Tablets which said the 1325 days referred to happenings within the Faith.
Here is the link to the two Tablets of Abdul-Baha clearly stating what was meant by the 1335 days.
PLEASE READ this link for AUTHORITATIVE Tablets from Abdul-Baha on the matter concerned. (1335 days)
bahai-library.com/shoghieffendi_blomfield_passing_abdulbaha
So to recapitulate. The words attributed to Abdul-Baha in Baha’u’llah and the New Era were incorrect and not authenticated by Abdul-Baha. The correct and authentic statement by Abdul-Baha was penned in two Tablets of His which I have provided in the link above.