T
Techno2000
Guest
De fide (of the faith)What do you think the de fide teaching means then Techno?
.
De fide (of the faith)What do you think the de fide teaching means then Techno?
.
Techno,De fide (of the faith)
It means only the Divine can know the Divine. The blessed in Heaven know the Father through Jesus, but they can never comprehend God completely because they aren’t Divine.Techno,
What is your understanding of what this means:
God’s Essence is also incomprehensible to the blessed in Heaven. (De Fide)
.
We have done this before in the “Is Muhammad foretold in the Bible?” thread. forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=13518719&postcount=146Hi ericc,
Could you please share with me these historic facts that you have checked?
I am sincerely interested in what these are that has convinced you in this direction. Thankyou
.
The confusion is ours, what we make and not Gods.At the end, there is just no hard evidence that your prophet was a “manifestation” of God. Bahaullah may be a wise and spiritual man, but he is not God material. He is a self -claimant. Gathering all prior religions into one basket and explaining that the God of each religion is actually the same just can not be true. If at each manifestation God is telling the prophet that the prior him is no longer valid, then your god has lied to each religion, every time. The Christian God never change because he is all Truth. Truth doesn’t change from one period to the other. The God of Abraham is the God of Moses is Christ himself. Where as the Bahai god changes to whatever century he finds himself in. If your god is omniscient, omnipotent, all truth, all good, all wise, there is no need to disguise himself and fake himself at each manifestation. Can’t he be at least be true to himself? Why lie?
And why would a manifestation create a perfect religion that till this day its followers say it needs no more Revelations, did the manifestation do too good of a Job ?We have done this before in the “Is Muhammad foretold in the Bible?” thread. forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=13518719&postcount=146
Seriously, if you have to resort to spiritual or invisible explanations each time your prophecy is not supported literally, it may be smarter, intellectually honest and efficient just not to bring it up. Invariably someone will do the background checks and discover what was claimed was not supported by historical data, Then you have to bring up all the spiritual, invisible, mystical, enlightened speak just to avoid admitting that those claims can not be substantiated. Please note that I didn’t say they were false, just not substantiated. It may be real for you. To us substantiation means some kind of verification. If I were to claim that I flew from Tokyo to London in an invisible pink jet plane in less than a minute spiritually , that is not substantiation. It appears real to me because I dreamt it spiritually, it appears real but it is not substantiated. It is not apparent at all. Not even a whiff that it is remotely possible. Same as for your prophecy. The dots don’t connect.
At the end, there is just no hard evidence that your prophet was a “manifestation” of God. Bahaullah may be a wise and spiritual man, but he is not God material. He is a self -claimant. Gathering all prior religions into one basket and explaining that the God of each religion is actually the same just can not be true. If at each manifestation God is telling the prophet that the prior him is no longer valid, then your god has lied to each religion, every time. The Christian God never change because he is all Truth. Truth doesn’t change from one period to the other. The God of Abraham is the God of Moses is Christ himself. Where as the Bahai god changes to whatever century he finds himself in. If your god is omniscient, omnipotent, all truth, all good, all wise, there is no need to disguise himself and fake himself at each manifestation. Can’t he be at least be true to himself? Why lie?
John 16:12"I have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. 13"But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come.…"And why would a manifestation create a perfect religion that till this day its followers say it needs no more Revelations, did the manifestation do too good of a Job ?
You twisting things again, the Church came before the Bible so all Revelations and truth are contained within the Catholic Church. Bahaism is an outside source of unbiblical Revelation.John 16:12"I have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. 13"But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come.…"
This is more than obvious there was more to come and that it was not Jesus the Christ that would bring that message.
Regards Tony
I twist not a thing, Gods Word is His Word and His Messengers are His Messengers.You twisting things again, the Church came before the Bible so all Revelations and truth are contained within the Catholic Church. Bahaism is an outside source of unbiblical Revelation.
if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is the church of the living God,** the pillar and foundation of the truth.
**
1 Timothy 3:15
Reveal His Names:shrug:I twist not a thing, Gods Word is His Word and His Messengers are His Messengers.
I but a Servant to Gods Word as we all are.
That I see it different is Free will gifted bybour One and Only God.
That God chooses to Reveal His Names as He does is not of my doing.
Regards Tony
My opinion yes and no.Did the "Manifestations of God’ all have the same DNA ?
That is because any Proof of Christ is Proof of Baha’u’llahthe Bahai will probably try to explain away the following as they have done with every aspect of the Gospel of Jesus Christ given to us through the successors of the apostles.
This really is a poor debate issue. The sacrifice of Jesus can never be understated, but 40 years of tortures, persecution and imprisonment can also not be Understated.Baha’ullah, unlike Jesus, lived out a natural life.
Baha’u’llah is rejected for Fulfilling all the Holy Scripture Prophecy of the past. Muhammad also fulfilled Prophecy, that a Christian rejects this does not mean it is not so. In fact given mans record in the past as to accepting the Prophets/Messengers It is more a proof of their missions.the Baha’i say that RCs reject Baha’ullah just as the Jews rejected Jesus. that is not true. this is a complete misunderstanding of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Baha’ullah was not a member of the RC faith as Jesus was a member of the Jewish faith. Jesus was rejected by the leaders of His faith for fulfilling that faith’s prophecies and the law. Baha’ullah, on the other hand, is rejected by RCs because he has no faith connection to Roman Catholicism. Mohammad is rejected by RCs for the SAME reason. Mohammad has no faith connection to RC. whereas Jesus fulfilled the Jewish law and prophecies, Mohammad and Baha’ullah have no faith connection to RC.
That all prophets/Messengers have a different Mission to carry out and they do it on earth in a different way does not change the Power of the Word in each Message. The reason for persecution was Exactly the same for Muhammad the Bab and Baha’u’llah. Note also that as in the past they did not succeed, they did not succeed with Muhammad the Bab and Baha’u’llah. Gods way not our way.the reason Jesus was rejected and ultimately murders by the romans was because the Jewish leaders at the time saw Him as being a threat to their worldly power. if Jesus was not murdered, the leaders foresaw and believed His following would grow without end. they believed all of the average (those without worldly power) Jews would give their loyalty to Jesus instead of to them, the law and the temple. the only way to stop Jesus’ acclaim and following was to get rid of Him. if Jesus had lived His life to a natural conclusion as Baha’ullah did, we do not know what would have become of Him in this mortal state. unlike Baha’ullah,
These comment show you have not looked at the Life of the Bab or Baha’u’llah. All your observations are incorrect. If you read this you will be able to balance your stories with facts reference.bahai.org/en/t/nz/DB/db-2.htmlJesus could not even have a home of His own, because the people would not permit it. they gathered around Him in such numbers that He and His apostles had to live in abandoned shacks to escape the crowds. bahaullah did not have that problem. bahaullah was not viewed by the authorities of his time as a significant threat to their worldly power and thus they had no reason to murder him. yes, they acted to stop his free movement lest his followers become a serious threat to their power, but that imposed isolation was sufficient to put an end to his followers threatening to grow beyond control as in the case of Jesus.
The intention is to let you know their are other views as to life and Faith and this has been stated many times.i would have far more respect for bahaullah and his followers if they were honest about their intentions. if the bahai taught that Jesus was wrong and that bahaullah rejected Jesus and His teachings as false, i could understand and respect such a teaching. i would still reject it, but without the prejudice created by the sophistry of bahaullah’s followers.