E
edwest211
Guest
Mr. Musk can send me one million dollars if that’s the case. After all, it’s not real money.
Ed
I’m not greedy
Ed
I’m not greedy
"It’s always wrong for nine year olds to have sex. Therefore, it’s always wrong for thirty nine year olds to have sex. " See where that logic breaks down?If it’s wrong for kids it’s wrong for adults. Sin does not stop becoming sin once we reach a certain age
Oh, sure. I’m not saying all games are good. You can definitely find examples of good and bad in just about every medium.Yeah, I’ve seem a few unwanted (meaning I go to a website looking for this and there’s an ad for that) images from video games and they are clearly sexually perverted.
I mean, I’m not surprised. I don’t mean this as an insult (seriously, not trying to rehash an old argument) but I know your stance on media is basically that everything that came around after 1959 or so is pure garbage. It doesn’t surprise that you wouldn’t see a lot that interests you.And I find these games to be a waste of time in general.
No, I know, but you seemed to be implying that if it’s wrong for a child to do something, it’s also wrong for an adult to do that thing. I don’t think that’s true, because we recognize that the “rightness” or “wrongness” of certain things can depend heavily on the age of the person doing it…see sex, drinking, smoking, etc. I mean, we morally condemn countries that use child soldiers. But when adults fight for their country, we throw them a parade. Clearly, whether something is morally appropriate can depend on someone’s age when they do it. Same holds true, in my mind, for media with adult themes.And the topic is “video games” not when can people have sex
Or just suggestive. Or involving violence. Or just subtle themes that are present in adult life and would resonate with an older audience but go straight over a kid’s head. It doesn’t have to just mean “bare boobs”.Adult Themes, unless it’s a documentary, usually means dirty, as in sexually dirty.
I’m not saying they’re the same thing. I’m saying that they both illustrate the principle that something can appropriate for one age and inappropriate for another.Fictional media does not compare with actually being out in the field and putting your life on the line.
But presumably, when he came home (as he hopefully did) he was respected and congratulated for his service. Most people would agree that he had done the morally upright, courageous thing.When I was a kid, me and my friends played “army.” Our helmets were plastic, our guns were plastic and our grenades were plastic. When the son of a close family friend had to go to war for real, I understood that. It meant he could actually die.
We can agree to disagree, but yeah, there is. Whether an action is wrong can depend heavily on the context in which they do it, one factor being the person’s age. Something (like sex, or drinking alcohol, or whatever) can be clearly wrong for a 12 year old, but can be okay for a 32 year old. If you don’t think that rationale applies to video games, that’s fine. But I don’t think you can say categorically that age never matters in evaluating whether something is okay or not.There is no such thing as a sin today is suddenly not a sin once you pass a certain age.
Don’t disagree with that much.Back to the topic: video games are rated and parents need to be informed.