C
CThomas
Guest
Hi, DavidFilmer. You “don’t appreciate” my extrapolation from your previous post, and I don’t appreciate your tone and your tendentious characterization of my previous post, so I guess we’re even. Your own personal views are neither here nor there to me, and I was alluding to my own view of the documents cited in your previous message, not to your own views about the purity of your own personal contrition (which is none of my concern one way or the other).
There is plenty that I would dispute in your catechism, but as I started out by saying in my first message, that is not the purpose of my inquiry.
CThomas
There is plenty that I would dispute in your catechism, but as I started out by saying in my first message, that is not the purpose of my inquiry.
CThomas