M
Maxirad
Guest
For those people who don’t have a ChurchMilitant.TV account, click here.
Indeed. This invitation to Obama was a mistake from the start. Check out the photo in the link below – do you really think it would have been wise for Germany’s most prominent bishop of the 1930s/1940s to have been seen like this next to Hitler? (Yes, I’m comparing Obama to Hitler, in that they both heartily supported the murder of innocents.)I agree jwinch. I think Cardinal Dolan should have nothing to do with the Obama administration so close to the election. There is so much confusion among Catholics - as evidenced by the Obama supporting Democrat Catholics on these forums. The Cardinal should not have attended the event - it contributes to the confusion among Catholics who think that its okay to vote for Obama. Obama is attacking the Catholic church - it is not cause for laughter and fellowship, but for drawing distinction between the Obama administration and the Catholic church.
Ishii
A little late, but yeah… What I meant is exactly what I said. If some people want to speculate that I was referring to specific people or want to put extra words in my mouth, then that’s their own problem. Not talking about you of course.The poster who talked about “shaking the dust from their feet” knew what he/she had in mind in saying it, and can further comment on it if he/she wishes.
Good for him. It’s great he’s getting a few good licks in on Obama. He seems to have a good sense of humor. I’m happy to see that he’s at least trying to get the Catholic vote, even if he’s being insincere (which I think he is somewhat). Better than Obama basically giving us Catholics the bird with his out-right support for the homosexual agenda and culture of death.There is some pretty entertaining stuff here …
I thought Obama was better, though I enjoyed both. Of course, the closing remarks by Cardinal Dolan were great.Good for him. It’s great he’s getting a few good licks in on Obama. He seems to have a good sense of humor. I’m happy to see that he’s at least trying to get the Catholic vote, even if he’s being insincere (which I think he is somewhat). Better than Obama basically giving us Catholics the bird with his out-right support for the homosexual agenda and culture of death.
However, Obama had a ton of potential material about Romney’s Mormonism to really crack up the room.
And Romney could tell Black jokes. Yes, that would go over really well on the national stage.Good for him. It’s great he’s getting a few good licks in on Obama. He seems to have a good sense of humor. I’m happy to see that he’s at least trying to get the Catholic vote, even if he’s being insincere (which I think he is somewhat). Better than Obama basically giving us Catholics the bird with his out-right support for the homosexual agenda and culture of death.
However, Obama had a ton of potential material about Romney’s Mormonism to really crack up the room.
They won’t. The polls prove that out. It is a bit too late in the game to hope to change the President or his ilk, not that Romney is some perfect man. But the enemy of good is perfect.The Cardinal handled the occasion beautifully, doing an excellent job of underscoring the point of the evening - Catholic charities. From Catholic New York:
*The cardinal’s most stirring remarks, however, came when he called on the two candidates to heed the vision of Al Smith, “a man of deep Catholic faith and ringing patriotism, who had a tear in his Irish eyes for what we would call the ‘uns’—the ‘uns’ of the world.”
These are, he said, the unemployed, the uninsured, the unwanted, the unwed mother, the innocent fragile unborn baby in her womb, the undocumented, the unhoused, the unhealthy, the unfed and the undereducated.
“Government, Al Smith believed, should be on the side of these ‘uns,’” Cardinal Dolan said. “But a government, he also believed, (should be) partnering with family, church, parish, neighborhood, organizations and community—never intruding or imposing since, when all is said and done, it’s in God we trust, not, ultimately, in government or politics.*
cny.org/stories/Jokes-Aside-at-Dinner-Cardinal-Dolan-Invokes-Al-Smiths-Vision-for-the-Uns-,8328
Both Republicans and Democrats would do well to pay close attention to the Cardinal’s words.
And, Obama will get kudos for his one-liners. Fact is, and we al know it, that the candidates don’t write their own jokes, but let humorous writers do that for them. I liked Obama’s self-depreciating humor myself, but both men were very good, and not to take anything away from either.Romney is hilarious, full of good humor. Americans like good humors. This speech should give him a few points up.
It took me quite a while to take a position on whether the president should have been invited to this dinner. On the one hand it is surely a political event and the president is after all the leader of one party and the presence of the two most important politicians is certainly appropriate. Also, unlike O’s presence at Notre Dame where he received an honorary degree, his presence at the dinner included no award or special recognition. I also suspect there was great concern that not inviting the president would make it seem like the Church was endorsing the Republicans which is clearly not the case.Still sickening to see the yuckity-yuck between a President being sued by the Church for violating their freedom of religious expression.
“Mitt is actually his middle name. I wish I could use my middle name.”And, Obama will get kudos for his one-liners. Fact is, and we al know it, that the candidates don’t write their own jokes, but let humorous writers do that for them. I liked Obama’s self-depreciating humor myself, but both men were very good, and not to take anything away from either.
Though I disagree with you, the Cardinal could not disinvite the President without disinviting Romney. I think it went well and was a welcome oasis of peace and conviviality in the midst of an otherwise give-no-quarter campaign by both candidates.I think Cardinal Dolan had a perfect opportunity to make that point by not inviting Obama.
Hold onto your hat!! Rich, I agree with you.Though I disagree with you, the Cardinal could not disinvite the President without disinviting Romney. I think it went well and was a welcome oasis of peace and conviviality in the midst of an otherwise give-no-quarter campaign by both candidates.
Hold onto your hat!! Rich, I agree with you.![]()
Sure he could. He could say “if either if you has ever been sued in Federal COurt by the Catholic Church, you are not welcome. Now, have either if you?” You most certainly can discriminate on these things. There are ALWAYS reasons why people can be disqualified from events. Not saying he SHOULD have done it this way, but he could have.Though I disagree with you, the Cardinal could not disinvite the President without disinviting Romney. I think it went well and was a welcome oasis of peace and conviviality in the midst of an otherwise give-no-quarter campaign by both candidates.