Apocalyptic language doesn’t necessarily point to the end times, at least not in the traditional sense.About the end times? Nothing. I’ve heard the term “end times” bandied about so much it’s lost all meaning for me (no offence).
Yeah, problem is that we are using violence to stop violence. It’s called escalation.We just want them to stop their support of terrorism.
Iranians could say the same of us. One man’s “freedom fighter” is another man’s “terrorist”. The killing of General Soleimani was a terrorist act, is forbidden under just war doctrine, and if not an act of war is simply murder.This goes way back in time. We may have made some mistakes, but their terror needs to be dealt with. We can’t sit by and let them kill with impunity.
One impending war is hardly the end of days. As God said , no one knows the hour or the day or the minute…Why are you not?
If you were president, and Iran killed yet another American (Soleimani is reported to be responsible for over 600 American deaths), what is your response?Convert3:
Iranians could say the same of us. One man’s “freedom fighter” is another man’s “terrorist”. The killing of General Soleimani was a terrorist act, is forbidden under just war doctrine, and if not an act of war is simply murder.This goes way back in time. We may have made some mistakes, but their terror needs to be dealt with. We can’t sit by and let them kill with impunity.
The US, as Iran, has sponsored terror. Start with a definition of terror, and I can give you examples of how we have done it.
Many men and women in the service have died on Trump’s watch. I expect that when that happens, our response is dictated is lawful and proportionate and dictated by the strategies in place to fulfill our well-defined mission.If you were president, and Iran killed yet another American (Soleimani is reported to be responsible for over 600 American deaths), what is your response?