V
Vouthon
Guest
Ok, well first of all, the Baha’is are not directly answering important questions asked by the Catholics.
Ok, well first of all, the Baha’is are not directly answering important questions asked by the Catholics.
Thanks for your post tritcher…Also, I do not understand how the Baha’is can teach “spiritual baptism” when they do not acknowledge Christ’s divinity.
This only underscores Abdul-Baha’s ignorance in understanding Christian baptism, or his purposeful misrepresentation. The outer, physical sign (cleansing with water) signifies the deeper spiritual reality of the cleansing of the soul by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit; God himself. It was Christ who commanded his disciples to baptize in this manner and historical records of the Church are evidence of this understanding throughout its history. Again, it seems as if what Christ and his Church really teach is ignored and replaced by the ideas of men who would have others instead follow them. In this case Abdul-Baha is speaking directly against what Christ commanded. Does he really think that as Christians we intend no more than to cleanse the body? He implies that we have been duped by practising what we have been taught by Jesus himself.Here’s what Abdul-Baha referred to:
The performance of baptismal celebration would cleanse the body, but the spirit hath no share; but the divine teachings and the exhortations of the Beauty of ABHA will baptize the soul. This is the real baptism. I hope that thou wilt receive this baptism. 328
Again, Christ’s words “Except a man hath received the baptism of water and of the spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God.” are either misinterpreted or not understood. How does being baptized by “water and the spirit” translate into the divine teachings? Christ was speaking of the Spirit of God; a divine Person, not a divine teaching. Abdul-Baha completely omitts speaking of the fundamental reason that we are to be baptized and that is the cleansing of our souls from the stain of sin.So, in the Koran it is said, “and we have caused a pure water to descend from heaven;” and in the Gospel, “Except a man hath received the baptism of water and of the spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God.” Then it is evident that the divine teachings are the heavenly grace and the showers of the mercy of God, which purify the hearts of men.
With all due respect I have already read through your references to the “Manifistation of God” and the answers are not to be found there. Please explain how Christ is divne? Abdul-Baha lumps him in with Moses and Abraham. They were not divne and never claimed to be. Christ claimed to be God himself. Christ is the one, true God who became flesh and dwelt among men. He is not a man who was possessed by God. There is only one divine being; God. To say that you acknowledge Christ’s divinity and at the same time reject that he is God seems nonsensical. How is Christ divine if he is not God?Christ’s divinity is also acknowledged by Baha’is…but we do not believe God was physically incarnated in Him. See my references above to the Manifestation of God!![]()
These are Abdul-Baha’s teachings: Christ and his church teach that Christ is not merely a person reflecting god’s attributes, but that he *is *god himself in the fullest sense. I am sure the Church would agree in that any sort of “spiritual baptism” that does not recognize the complete divinity of Christ is invalid.We, the Bahai’s, view Christ as divine because He perfectly reflected the attributes of God to humanity.
Tritcher thanks for your post,Thank you Mr. arthra for your response: I have some additional thoughts: Arthra, I see you making lengthy affirmations of Bahai, yet you maintain that “you are not here to argue”: Why do you resist debate? In the previous post, you appear to be defending the validity of the Bahai “spiritual baptism” by claiming that:
“We, the Bahai’s, view Christ as divine because He perfectly reflected the attributes of God to humanity.”
These are Abdul-Baha’s teachings: Christ and his church teach that Christ is not merely a person reflecting god’s attributes, but that he *is *god himself in the fullest sense. I am sure the Church would agree in that any sort of “spiritual baptism” that does not recognize the complete divinity of Christ is invalid.
Thanks for your post Tritcher!Well, good to know. Debating has helped me to strengthen my beliefs. I wonder about this Abdul-Baha and how it is that he can speak over the authority of Jesus.
Arthra, I am not here for the purpose of simply arguing for arguments sake. You are on a Catholic forum and your faith tradition claims to incorporate Jesus Christ as one of its prophets, or “Manifistations of God”. What that says to me is that you profess to follow Jesus in some manner. I am simply pointing out some obvious discrepancies in what Jesus himself claimed regarding his identity and purpose, according to the Christian record of his life; the Scriptures and the Tradition of the Church which he, himself founded. I am not aware of any other credible source by which one can gather information concerning Him.Thanks Steve,
I’m really not here to argue with you about your post…I know from your previous posts that you already have your own views.
Tritcher,Well who imprisoned him and what for? I am less interested in visiting your links than I am in reading about it in your own writing.
The Jesus you speak of is not a manisfestation of God, but rather a manifestation of human imagination, contrived for the purpose of leading people away from the true God. I would suggest that you read the true account of Jesus life, his teachings, his miracles, his claim to be the one, true God. You say that we have covered the subject already, yet you refuse to address the conflicts that have been brought to your attention. That subject has not been covered in the least, rather it has been side stepped with various quotes which keep repeating the very principles which cause the question to be asked in the first place.Thanks Steve for your post… Yes I think we’ve covered the subject already.
God’s blessings!
Tritcher,Well that is some interesting history. So the early Baha’is claimed to fulfill ‘prophesies’ from the Quaran, and began teaching and interperating outside of the Muslim tradition. This upset the Muslim leadership who then began to move against the early Baha’is with violence. I wonder, did the early ‘disciples’ of Bahai respond with violence against the Muslim leadership? And how did this Abdul-Baha escape from his prison in Akka?
Steve…The Jesus you speak of is not a manisfestation of God, but rather a manifestation of human imagination, contrived for the purpose of leading people away from the true God. I would suggest that you read the true account of Jesus life, his teachings, his miracles, his claim to be the one, true God. You say that we have covered the subject already, yet you refuse to address the conflicts that have been brought to your attention. That subject has not been covered in the least, rather it has been side stepped with various quotes which keep repeating the very principles which cause the question to be asked in the first place.![]()