R
ringil
Guest
Come on Rich. “illeagals”?I’ve had my home re-roofed, by Hispanic workers, and the work was outstanding. No AA involved at all - truth be told, the men were likely illegals - but the work didn’t suffer.![]()
Come on Rich. “illeagals”?I’ve had my home re-roofed, by Hispanic workers, and the work was outstanding. No AA involved at all - truth be told, the men were likely illegals - but the work didn’t suffer.![]()
A guess.Come on Rich. “illeagals”?
I’m just surprised you use the term “illegals”. It’s not a great term popularized by the rightists, but hey, I don’t want to pontificate.A guess.![]()
I agree. I prefer to use the correct term - illegal aliens. No shortcuts!I’m just surprised you use the term “illegals”. It’s not a great term popularized by the rightists, but hey, I don’t want to pontificate.
While I agree with you that inequities currently exist in the system, I disagree that colleges, especially government run colleges, discriminating in favor of minorities to compensate is appropriate, although it is well-intentioned. There are three primary areas that I can think of in which minorities tend to experience inequities: economic opportunity, educational opportunity, and discrimination from others in society experienced on a day-to-day basis (perhaps there are more that I am unaware of because of naivety).For those who forgot, policies like these exist because there is currently an inequity in the system that we would like to address (a current inequity that owes its cause to deep-rooted social problems established long in the past that continue to have effects today, effects that we, as a society today, generally do not like). It has nothing to do with making people “pay for the past” and everything to do with making changes to inequities that exist now.
So, we’ve come up with policies that take those inequalities somewhat into account when making decisions like, for example, college admissions. Makes sense, doesn’t it? It’s hardly what anyone in his right mind would call unreasonable.