Coronavirus Mass Changes - Communion in Hand?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheDumbFox
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TheDumbFox

Guest

My diocese just made changes to those points of contact during the Mass, like the sign of peace, due to the coronavirus scare. I’m fine with that, but it seems like they’re mandating communion be received in the hand and not on the tongue. Can they do this? I haven’t received communion in the hand in years! I would almost rather forego receiving Jesus at all rather than receive him in my hand!
 
I haven’t received communion in the hand in years! I would almost rather forego receiving Jesus at all rather than receive him in my hand!
I can relate. It has been over ten years, but I seriously considered recieving Him in the hand last Sunday.
 
I’m seriously conflicted. They can’t enforce this at Latin Mass though, right?
 
I’m seriously conflicted. They can’t enforce this at Latin Mass though, right?
No they can’t. I’d suggest if you can’t go to the TLM to make a spiritual communion instead, so as to respect your bishop’s wishes while avoiding touching the Blessed Sacrament with your hands on your part.
 
Last edited:
Like, what is Jesus’ opinion, ya know? Am I offending him worse by not receiving, or by allowing there to be a possibility of desecration?

On the other side, if the Church, Jesus’ Body, says that something is completely okay, shouldn’t I agree with that?
 
On the other side, if the Church, Jesus’ Body, says that something is completely okay, shouldn’t I agree with that?
Yes, and in addition you would actually be following Christ’s command to “take and eat”.

For what it’s worth I haven’t received Christ on my hand since becoming Catholic 15 years ago, and I would rather receive on the hand than deny Him.

Peace and God bless!
 
Last edited:
Spiritual communion doesn’t mean you’re not receiving Jesus.
That article is about those who can’t Receive, not those who refuse to Receive.

If you can’t go to Mass, or you are in sin, then accept Spiritual Communion as your best effort towards Receiving Him. If you are right there and able, yet you turn away, how is that your best effort? If you’d walk on your knees to receive Him on the tongue, but stay in the pew rather than touch Him with your hand, how will you sit with the woman who was cured by touching Christ’s robe? Have Faith that He wants you to Receive Him and reach out your hand.

Peace and God bless!
 
Last edited:
My Diocese has made the peace greeting a bow to each other rather then a handshake
 
That article is about those who can’t Receive, not those who refuse to Receive.
There’s nothing in there that states you may only make a spiritual communion if it is not possible to receive.
If you are right there and able, yet you turn away, how is that your best effort?
You are not required to receive Jesus at every Mass, and not receiving Him while in a state of grace is not rejecting Him. Did you know that frequent reception is a relatively new phenomenon encouraged by St. Pius X? Were the thousands of Catholics who thought themselves too unworthy to present themselves for communion despite not being in a state of mortal sin rejecting Him? Or were they just not putting forth their best effort? I personally have elected to make a spiritual communion during Mass despite not being in a state of mortal sin because my mind was not in the right place to be receiving Jesus. Did I not put forth my best effort?
 
Last edited:
There’s nothing in there that states you may only make a spiritual communion if it is not possible to receive.
Right, because it is an article written for positive edification, not negative proscription. The very heading of the article says “Can’t receive”, not “won’t receive”. It is explicitly about those who are limited from receiving Communion due to some moral or physical boundary.
You are not required to receive Jesus at every Mass, and not receiving Him while in a state of grace is not rejecting Him.
Not Receiving Him while in a State of Grace because you won’t Receive Him in a manner that His Own Body has explicitly stated is both acceptable and righteous seems a bit problematic. People in lesser states reached out and touched Him and were healed.
I personally have elected to make a spiritual communion during Mass despite not being in a state of mortal sin because my mind was not in the right place to be receiving Jesus. Did I not put forth my best effort?
This is a wholly different situation than what the OP presented.

Peace and God bless!
 
Last edited:
Right, because it is an article written for positive edification, not negative proscription. The very heading of the article says “Can’t receive”, not “won’t receive”. It is explicitly about those who are limited from receiving Communion due to some moral or physical boundary.
Because that is the main reason why people don’t. Pandemics are not very common occurrences.
Not Receiving Him while in a State of Grace because you won’t Receive Him in a manner that His Own Body has explicitly stated is both acceptable and righteous seems a bit problematic. People in lesser states reached out and touched Him and were healed.
Luke Chapter 7:
“7:6 And Jesus went with them. And when he was now not far from the house, the centurion sent his friends to him, saying: Lord, trouble not thyself; for I am not worthy that thou shouldst enter under my roof.
7:7 For which cause neither did I think myself worthy to come to thee: but say the word, and my servant shall be healed.
7:8 For I also am a man subject to authority, having under me soldiers: and I say to one, Go, and he goeth: and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doth it.
7:9 Which Jesus hearing, marvelled: and turning about to the multitude that followed him, he said: Amen I say to you, I have not found so great faith, not even in Israel.”
People don’t need to physically touch Jesus to be healed or receive His presence. It is a fact that you are not required to receive communion at every Mass while in a state of grace. There are perfectly pious reasons for not doing so and in fact used to be the norm.
This is a wholly different situation than what the OP presented.
But is nonetheless a valid and pious reason for not receiving communion while in a state of grace. It was not a denial of Him.
 
Because that is the main reason why people don’t. Pandemics are not very common occurrences.
The article doesn’t address the issue of pandemics as a reason to avoid physical Communion, and neither does the OP.
People don’t need to physically touch Jesus to be healed or receive His presence. It is a fact that you are not required to receive communion at every Mass while in a state of grace. There are perfectly pious reasons for not doing so and in fact used to be the norm.
Christ didn’t institute the Sacrament of Avoiding Touching Him.
But is nonetheless a valid and pious reason for not receiving communion while in a state of grace. It was not a denial of Him.
Your reasons for not receiving Communion are not a matter of discussion here.

Peace and God bless!
 
but it seems like they’re mandating communion be received in the hand and not on the tongue. Can they do this?
Patrick Madrid spoke about this on Relevant Radio. His opinion was this was a little bit reach because priests know how to place the host on the tongue without issue.

My assumption is that because a number of lay EMHCs have a tendency to touch tongues, etc.

A compromise could have been, please only receive on the tongue from a priest. However, I guess it’s simply easier to make a blanket rule?

Whether it’s legal according to Canon Law, I have no idea in such a situation.
 
11 and 12 year old boys are not necessarily known for their piety. When I was an altar boy (starting at 11) we would compare notes of how long a string of spit our priest had pulled. Patrick Madrid to the contrary, it is altogether too easy to make contact with the tongue.

I happen to like Patrick, but his statement is to the contrary.
 
When I was an altar boy holding the paten under numerous chins at numerous Masses, I don`t recall being at all conscious of this happening ever. It obviously can happen but I suspect that there is as much contamination of the hand via the use of communal hymnals and hand shaking as anything else. Interestingly, an OF parish I sometimes attend, has a procedure whereby the Extra Ordinary Eucharistic Ministers consume the Precious Blood (should any remain) in the chalice and purify the ciborium and the chalice itself and then drink the residue. I trust that this will now stop and purification of all scared vessels and residual contents will now be carried out soley by the priest once again should Extra Ordinary Ministers continue to distribute the Precious Blood.
 
The changes to the celebration of the Liturgy are also being made in the Archdiocese of San Antonio. Changes include: temporarily distributing Holy Communion in the hand rather than on the tongue, temporarily discontinuing the distribution of the Precious Blood at Mass, removing holy water from fonts at the church doors, and avoiding physical contact. There’s no indication when the changes will be reverted. This makes me truly sad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top