Could the parables of Jesus have been real stories?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Emanuel12
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

Emanuel12

Guest
Could the parables that Jesus taugh have been real events that he wittnessed(as God) before his incarnation ?
 
Last edited:
I think not, as He explained the meaning of some, particularly the parable of the sower of seeds. That parable was in the classic sense: analogy used to explain a moral or spiritual reality.
 
I don’t think they were stories about actual events although I don’t know for sure. They could be but I am thinking they are fictional stories that Jesus told in order to make a point.
 
Could the parables that Jesus taugh have been real events that he wittnessed(as God) before his incarnation ?
No, I don’t think that’s a reasonable suggestion. ‘Parable’ is the Greek for a Hebrew word, which shows up even in the OT as a particular rhetorical form. The fact that the evangelists ID these stories as ‘parables’ points to the fact that they recognize them as such.
 
Yes, definitely. Human beings are only capable of many but a still finite set of actions. Human behavior has not changed in over 2,000 years.
 
Yes, definitely. Human beings are only capable of many but a still finite set of actions. Human behavior has not changed in over 2,000 years.
That’s quite the leap of logic you just made there, in two small words! There’s quite a chasm between “humans act in human ways” and “an arbitrary story is an account of an actual event”!
 
Jesus always spoke the truth. Human behavior has only limited ways of playing out, such as the parable of the traveler who was beaten and robbed.
 
Jesus always spoke the truth. Human behavior has only limited ways of playing out, such as the parable of the traveler who was beaten and robbed.
In Luke 13:32, Jesus calls Herod a “fox”. Is Herod really a fox?
 
I sometimes think they are very confusing. Perhaps he spoke parabolically in order not to make a point, so that hearing they may not hear, etc.
 
The origin of the story (parable) has no bearing whatsoever on the point Jesus was trying to make. To suggest that it does seems to delve into the realm of questioning Jesus in some manner.
 
They could have been true. Keep in mind that Our Lord, in His divine nature, knew every thing that every human being had ever done or seen, in the entire history of the world. He would have had no shortage of human experience from which to draw parables.
 
.
There have been different opinions about this over the centuries over one of the parables, the parable of the rich man who ended in hell and the beggar at his gate who ended in heaven (Luke 16:19-31). Personally I have wondered if this is a true story or not.
 
Last edited:
When Jesus says “There was a man…” I believe Him. Debating literal as opposed to telling a non-literal story to make a point profits no one.
 
But we for example when we try to give a moral message we explain something that we had seen happen. Jesus has lived as God for so long and has witnessed the lives and stories of countless people. At the parable of the rich man Jesus called the poor man by name “Lazarus”.
 
Look up the meaning of the name “Lazarus” and you will have a better idea why He used that name. Secondly, everyone would have known the “rich man” if he was an actual person. Conversely, no one would have cared who Lazarus was. So, why then name Lazarus and not the rich man?
 
Last edited:
When Jesus says “There was a man…” I believe Him. Debating literal as opposed to telling a non-literal story to make a point profits no one.
Except that’s exactly the point of a parable: to describe something heavenly in a human way. It doesn’t mean that the parable is based on a true story, and a parable doesn’t lose its power merely because it isn’t based on a true story.
 
When Jesus says “There was a man…” I believe Him.
But when Scripture tells you that it’s only a parable, you disbelieve it?

And, you know what’s really funny? I just ran a quick search of the phrase “there was a man” in the Gospels… and it never occurs in the context of a parable. 🤔
 
They could have been true. Keep in mind that Our Lord, in His divine nature, knew every thing that every human being had ever done or seen, in the entire history of the world. He would have had no shortage of human experience from which to draw parables.
I think this is a really good point. Even if three ‘real’ stories are sometimes woven into one parable. Perhaps the realness of the stories helps make them so powerful and poignant even 2000 years later.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top