He doesn’t have “his own, “separate” self” that only exists in light. He has one self, and it exists even when there is not light shining on it.
Um, no, bodies do not “sing” in light. I have no idea what you are talking about.
Just because my religious tag says catholic it does not mean “practicing Catholic”.
How can an argument be invalid when it has a conscious purpose given to us by our Father, the only truth? Are you above Father?
If Father wanted to challenge a religious belief are you therefore implying that simply being Catholic is the only way in which a message can be received and only you can verify the authenticity of that spiritual message?
Experience is a human acquired outcome from an event and if you think my life experience weird then you are more than welcome to examine it.
What you are implying is that Father was without creation to shine upon it implying that the space cell was already present, and this statement itself goes against the holy teachings. The teachings advise you that Father lost form from out of his own Heaven and this Heaven is Light.
Therefore Father first lost a body and to do this it had to have been converted. The obvious question is how could a light body convert itself and this could only imply to harmonic differences in the light itself. Therefore this would prove that our Father exists in a Light Heaven. Now if you are arguing this position, then you don’t believe that Father actually exists himself.
What you imply is that light is only “light” and it does not hold bodies within itself.
Where would you imply a spiritual vision comes from or an angelic being of light. Are you implying that these human experiences have never occurred? If so then where did the literature and the spiritual awareness come from to write the original documents regarding the loss from light?
If you question the presence of Father in the Light as a Creator who can consciously express his own self, then why believe in the Catholic doctrine, just be Scientists yourselves.
Therefore the observations of any human being rely on self experience, and even if you think yourself enabled to authenticate spirit gives rise to the summation that you think that you yourself are above human thought through scientific authentication, thought of which you yourself are a part of. In other words does consciousness exist without a body. Ask NASA, they already have the data that proves this.
If I explained to you that I was nearly self combusted and was saved by Father, then please examine by circumstances. My brain signals would verify this through the alpha frequencies that should be present in all human incoming signals that relate to organic matter. My brain will verify for you that they are missing and yet I am still functioning as a normal human consciousness.
If you have ever questioned the Christ reality, the sacrifice explains that our Father sacrificed a part of spirit to become flesh - human life. His light spirit became blood which is why human cellular development comes from his spirit in light and we return to light at death, and it is why blood is affected when Scientists alter the harmonic bonds (string theory). This is proven by the loss of planetary/Earth/Sun UFO bodies and the alien spiritual attacks occurring worldwide along with the stigmata SIGN as a warning.
My disagreement with anyone in an authority level is that authentication by the Church regarding Father seems to be placed as a substantiation through the created act itself that we call science or scientific exploration. You use an authentication practice for demonic possession, how do you authenticate a light presence or a light visitation?
Seemingly the purpose of the written word and actual spiritual experience is ignored, when its very relevance pertains that spiritual experience pre dated the attempt of a human beings understanding of experimentation regarding the creative act (as science) or an understanding of the burnt/demonic spirit.