Too bad. I really like the petrified battery. How about the spark plug? Find any petrified spark plugs?
HM----No I haven’t found any spark plugs and paleontologists have not found any of the “missing links” either.
Oh yes there were claims like Piltdown man, Nebraska man, “I love Lucy,” and they save the best laugher for last, cute little “Ida”
What exactly is evolution of life from rocks?
HM----Suppose you tell us, you are the expert on evolution of life from non-life [we are made up of all that good stuff that stars are made of as we evolved from the “Big Bang 15 or so billions of years ago.” I just saw it again on the history channel last night so it must be true, however I’m willing to read your version if it’s different, oh all knowing Orogeny.]
HM—I know that you can hardly wait Tim for the publication of the data and conclusions but be patient; it’s on the way with a preview in a recent issue of Radici Christiane, in Italian, and the full paper with 50 some technical references with regards the geologic strata, identification of dinosaur femur bones and full discussion of C-14 dating methods that were used to extract and purify bone collagen and bone bio-apatite to show that dinosaurs lived contemporaneously with man.
Even the contaminants were eliminated, extracted and C-14 dated so that everyone would know that correct protocols common to dating of bones and other associated fossils were followed which show that: There are NO 65 million years between man and dinosaurs. You see, I was thinking of you when I had the contaminant C-14 dated.
The evolutionists could have C-14 dated the soft tissue, bone collagen and bone bio-apatite they found in their T-Rex and Hadrosaur femurs but didn’t; why???
You know, Hugh, I really love it when you come around. I always get a really good chuckle reading your posts.
HM—Feelings mutual pal. And those Cat-Scaned fossil human footprints with dinosaur ones and their counterpart pristine fossil human hand and footprints in alleged 108 million year old Cretaceous limestone rock; and, the dinosaur depictions World Wide, observed and documented by archaeologists, confirm the 2000 times younger ages noted by C-14 dating dinosaur bones.
Publish or perish, pal. Piece of cake if your evidence is so slam dunk.What, the concept of geologic time has changed (dare I say evolved?) in 90 years? Since before we had good radiometric dating techniques? I’m shocked! Next thing you will tell me is that we no longer use steam engines to power riverboats!So you admit that it is all about faith and not science. At least you are honest about that, even if your notion of faith is flawed.
HM—I use reliable field and lab research tests as do the sedimentologists, physicists, geophysicists, educators, theologians whose papers will be published with mine to support our faith in Christ and the church fathers; but, you Tim rely on the long age, erratic and questionable radiometric dating methods to try and support those long ages required for your belief in the fairy tale of evolution of life from the “rocks.” Again I repeat: “Moses sizzles while Darwin fizzles.” I would further add a word of praise and respect for the church fathers from St. Peter to St. John Damacene (AD ~725) to St. Lawrence of Brindisi (AD~1575) to St. Pius X whose body remain incorruptable
: Blessed are they who have not seen [the science] yet believe.
Peace [HM—pacem]
Tim
