Creation of the Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lunam_Meam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

Lunam_Meam

Guest
I learned when the Creator made the Earth, He drew it out of nothing, uniting gases of ether
(which was previously created [by God] and became firmament) into a mass, which, in rotating, became solid like a meteoric avalanche, which continually grew around a primitive nucleus.

Even our Negation—a term given to that Science which wants to explain things without God—admits the centripetal force, which allows a body to rotate without losing parts of itself, or rather it attracts all parts to its center. We have machines, which however grandiose, still repeat in a microscopic way the centripetal force
created by God to create worlds, and force them to rotate around the sun, a fixed pivot, unable to leave the Heavenly paths assigned to them; otherwise, they would disturb the order of creation, and provoke cataclysms with incalculable destructions.

The Earth, thus getting its form during its course as a nebular projectile, which solidifies itself crossing space, and to rob, even by force, also emanations, and elements which came from other sources, and which remained locked up in it under the form of volcanic fires, sulphurs, waters, and divers minerals. These appear on the surface giving testimony of their existence, and of the mysteries, which with all our science we do not succeed in explaining with exact truth, the mysteries of the Earth, a planet created from nothing by God, our Father.

How do you think the Earth was created?
 
Last edited:
I’m gonna be honest, I understood
And that’s about it. Could you explain your grand theory again, maybe a bit more piecewise so it’s easier for someone to comprehend? It seems like it could be clear but I got lost and couldn’t find the tracks.

Oh and my theory is that Earth formed exactly how astronomers say it did, since that matches the evidence we have.
 
Last edited:
By God, any other questions I will refer you to the book of Genesis.
 
God brought into being the cosmos from nothing and sustains it in being. Things then most likely proceeded as modern cosmological science describes.
 
I object! You are assuming facts not in evidence.
No one was there. We have no written record until unknown eons after the big bang - recalling here that if you object to the big bang, you propose to be more enlightened than Albert Einstein.
Creation ex nihilo, de novo.
How satisfying it is to revel in the greatness of God, all the while correctly ordering our thoughts from the position of “less than God.”
 
Last edited:
God brought into being the cosmos from nothing and sustains it in being. Things then most likely proceeded as modern cosmological science describes.
I agree that the procession of science is after God beings the “work” of sustaining but no longer direct, miraculous crestive work. God rested on the 7th day, but Jesus tells us His Father worketh still, meaning His sustaining, so it seems implied days 1-6 are “works” in the sense of direct creative activity and 7 is when we go to the sense of sustaining, at which point the normal course of physics takes place (as the direct creative activity appears to have ended).

In response to the OP, I am more than content to say, “In the beginning, God created the Heaven and the Earth…”
 
Last edited:
One of the unique things about Earth is plate tectonics. And it may be key to life on the planet. As far as we know, we live in the best of all possible worlds.
 
I believe the earth and the seas were formed supernaturally by God, his creative activity, as it is said in Genesis 1 on the third day by gathering together the elements of the earth which he created in the beginning signified by ‘earth’ in Gen. 1:1 “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth”. In this initial formation of the earth by God, he set in natural processes that continue to today such as volcanoes and plate tectonics if this later is actually the case.
 
Then how do you square that theory with stellar pheonomena that seem to suggest a natural, physical formation of Earth instead of a direct intervention by God?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top