Well, using my own example as a model to apply a real world working example. I am very much a creationist, the how element is where modern science stumbles upon, and it’s due to their lack of understanding about history, which in turn causes all too often, these so called new advancements really are just rediscovering what used to be common knowledge.
My example being, what I do in my field pioneers within it to all new levels, there is serious advancement within it towards a scientific level, and I’m leaving my secular competition to dwell in their own dark ages as they are eating my dust. I regularly run into serious obstacles that entirely baffle the mind as to finding a solution, yet in most cases, it’s divine inspiration not self reliance through pure logic that gets me through those times.
Coming back to pure science, how many times throughout history, where what is considered scientific fact, turned out to be completely wrong? It has happened so often, that it in itself has proven to be unreliable as the ultimate authority, and at best, is used as a tool to help advance knowledge. The fact I have a moral base to proceed forward is the defining factor, it’s not if I can do something, it is if it’s prudent to do so. If it was left unchecked, with no moral core, and you are justifying your means purely by the result no matter how horrendous the means are, clearly you are taking direct opposition to the human factor. We have plenty of examples of this in place today, we have diseases with no cure that were not around until someone decided to pursue endeavors unchecked. We have weapons that can destroy the world over many fold, and these are now falling into the hands of the wrong people. We have our modern scientific focus on so many areas that do no good for the human race what so ever, yet we have so many areas of humanity suffering needlessly entirely because it doesn’t seem profitable for the scientific community to address.
With the creation vs evolution debate, how does a creationist explain the fact, that in tact, unfossilized dinosaur bones are regularly found in tact, what about with the recent finds of human foot print impressions being found right along with dinosaur ones, on the same slab, and of the same carbon date. Evolution teaches that dinosaurs can not in any way exist along the same time line as man, yet in Job, it describes 3 of them? You see how the bible itself has proven itself to be accurate, yet just because we have not discovered the how element within the secular teachings, it is still dismissed, and genesis being one of them they still are deeply troubled over, because it doesn’t fit within their model. It could have easily been written to support evolution, if God decided to use evolution within his plans of creation, but honestly, if he can form the building blocks to life, why stop there, because even those building blocks would require something impossible, just as forming the completed creation, and it’s because that we are limited as man, he is not.
.