Yes and no. Probably I’m not clear enough due to cultural or language issues.
First, the major, practical questions, like the kids’ school, work, where to live etc are of greater importance to a marriage than any wedding formalia. Secondly, there isn’t a specific marriage rite that would affect my relationship with my own church, much less with God. I didn’t mean to sound flippant or disinterested, just that (besides not vowing what you cannot keep, as Qwerty noted) it is really of less importance.
If my bf truly prefers a civil ceremony, if he doesn’t care about his own future, possible standing with his own church, then that is what he wants and I respect that stand-point. It would make the marriage no less valid and sacramental in my eyes, although I’m aware the Catholic church disagrees.
However, if he’s suggesting this because of the hassle (on top of everything else), or not having researched the requirements or of a mistaken belief that it’s what I would prefer, it’s different. And it’s something we need to discuss. But if I’m ignorant of the Catholic side, that discussion might lead us wrong.
I asked here at CAF in order to learn more of what the options and conditions might be in our case. The upsides and downsides, if you wish.
Also, from a Scandinavian perspective ’moderately devout’ apparently means something quite different from the Catholic view, as represented on these forums. I used that phrase to indicate I’m neither froth-at-the-mouth anti-church or anti-Catholic. But I’m sure I don’t fit the standard, expected mould for a ’moderately devout’ middle aged widow.
Edit: I’m not sure how not planning to convert reflects on caring less about faith. (If I understood you correctly). He may be a lukewarm, cultural Catholic but he’s not about to turn Lutheran, and I wouldn’t think to even ask that. And I’m not going to convert either, although I think the Catholic church is closer in many ways than some other, technically protestant, denominations. Guess I’m more of a bridge builder than a bridge burner.