Not so fast with the slam. Is it not enough that CRS has humbly admitted the error and stated that they will correct it, even giving credit to LifeSiteNews? I believe that this shows that they are serious about keeping true to their mission statement.Would this have happened with out LifeSiteNews and other blogs that reported this? Do to think so. These sites deserve credit :clapping:
“We continue to review all our publications and programs to ensure there is full compliance with this position,” the CRS statement continued. “We thank LifeSite News for pointing out this inconsistency, which will be corrected.”
I commend CRS, better late than never, but as a Catholic organisation they should of not had such errors in the first placeNot so fast with the slam. Is it not enough that CRS has humbly admitted the error and stated that they will correct it, even giving credit to LifeSiteNews? I believe that this shows that they are serious about keeping true to their mission statement.
Don’t forget to donate, now.I commend CRS, better late than never, but as a Catholic organisation they should of not had such errors in the first place
Does this document mean will stop giving money to CARE?Don’t forget to donate, now.
I suspect that CRS will continue to collaborate with other organizations in giving emergency relief.Does this document mean will stop giving money to CARE?
Would recommend against CRS donationsI suspect that CRS will continue to collaborate with other organizations in giving emergency relief.
What you choose to do with your money is your business. But to recommend that others not give donations to CRS is going to far. in my opinion.Would recommend against CRS donations
Would not recommend anyone donate that cares whether their money gets given to a group promoting contraception. CRS have made a step forward with the document but they have a way to go before many will give them moneyWhat you choose to do with your money is your business. But to recommend that others not give donations to CRS is going to far. in my opinion.
Again, you and the “many” that you refer to can make your own decisions based on what you have learned but to recommend that others not give to CRS because “their money gets given to a group promoting contraception” is misleading. CRS does not donate to any programs that go against church teaching:Would not recommend anyone donate that cares whether their money gets given to a group promoting contraception. CRS have made a step forward with the document but they have a way to go before many will give them money
CRS Revising HIV Prevention Document
****Posted on **August 31, 2012 by John Rivera
As we’ve stated previously, Catholic Relief Services welcomes (name removed by moderator)ut and critique from people of good will who present it in a constructive and collegial spirit that is intended to support and further the life-saving and life-affirming work that CRS does for millions of the poor around the world.
CRS does not purchase, promote or distribute condoms, nor do we provide funding to other organizations for the purchase, promotion or distribution of condoms. LifeSite News recently made us aware of a document that did not conform to this position.
We continue to review all our publications and programs to ensure there is full compliance with this position. We thank LifeSite News for pointing out this inconsistency, which will be corrected.
CARE promotes contraception and they give money to themAgain, you and the “many” that you refer to can make your own decisions based on what you have learned but to recommend that others not give to CRS because “their money gets given to a group promoting contraception” is misleading. CRS does not donate to any programs that go against church teaching:
CRS promotes Natural Family Planning.CARE promotes contraception and they give money to them
CRS also instructed its employees to inform participants in a CRS drug/HIV program where they can obtain condoms. Oh, and that same document also provided a workshop on how to use a condom. CRS may promote Natural Family Planning, but the evidence shows that it most CERTAINLY ALSO promotes condom use … even if they claim otherwise.CRS promotes Natural Family Planning.
Reporter Meredith Cohn (Baltimore Sun) quotes Dr. John Haas of the National Catholic Bioethics Center:
" Giving money — federal or private — to CARE for “good legitimate purposes” would not violate Catholic doctrine even if the group uses a small amount of its own money for contraception, said Dr. John Haas of the National Catholic Bioethics Center, which advises Catholic Relief on grant recipients."
No … CRS just tells its clients how effective condoms are and where they can get them.Again, you and the “many” that you refer to can make your own decisions based on what you have learned but to recommend that others not give to CRS because “their money gets given to a group promoting contraception” is misleading. CRS does not donate to any programs that go against church teaching:
This is only your opinion, nothing more. It is my opinion that CRS is doing everything to keep in line with Church teaching and when some valid criticism has been called to their attention that deserves correction, such as the topic of this thread, they have responded accordingly.No … CRS just tells its clients how effective condoms are and where they can get them.
At least, now we understand the NATURE of the relationships between CRS and these pro-abortion groups. :nope:
The only solution here is for CRS to COMPLETELY break away from these groups and NEVER work with them, and CERTAINLY never give them money! But for that to happen, CRS would have to fire all it’s pro-abortion/pro-contraception staff and burn all its documents that promote condoms.
Honestly, I really don’t think that this is too much to ask.
Western Catholics agencies should be all the more eager to stand in solidarity with the Church in other parts of the world precisely against just such moral regression – a considerable obstacle to human development everywhere, perhaps especially in the “developed,” but bleaker, swaths of the modern West.
Yet on my own many trips to Africa with Catholic Relief Services, for example, it was not uncommon to hear locals refer to them as the “non-Catholic Catholic agency.” (Imagine what they say about CAFOD – the Catholic Agency for Overseas Development).
African bishops would tell me (after my talks about AIDS) how surprising it was to hear a young Western CRS employee speak the common Catholic language, whereas my superiors back in Baltimore told me that I would change my thinking about the way we should approach AIDS prevention – that I’d begin to oppose Church teachings – once I spent yet more time in Africa. thecatholicthing.org/columns/2011/challenges-for-the-caritas-network.html