Culture change in the Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter lemonbeam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
**There has been much advice given to the Catholic Church in regard to the sexual abuse scandals. There are, though, only two real options. The Church can become more Catholic, or less Catholic.
**

Read more here: catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0330.htm
Thank you for providing both the quote and the link. We all need to become educated on this issue which has brought shame to the Church. As someone who knew two boys who were abused and who knew the priest who abused them, I have been saddened for a long time.

Holy Mother, please keep
all unborn children safe tonight.
 
So we Vatican II supporters and Liberal Catholics are to blame…its all our fault…twaddle…the only priest I know of whose been accused of child abuse opposed Vatican II and the vernacular liturgy…abuse happened long before Vatican II and was hidden away…by excusing priestly behaviour as a by-product of liberalism is an easy way of absolving our clerics of responsibility for covering up the abuse of children over a very long period of time (not to mention alcohol abuse)…frankly the cleaning up of the morals of our clergy is long overdue so that good priests are not tarnished by the ungodly among them and worldly bishops lay aside their ambition and return to being shepherds of their flock…
 
The assumption is flawed. Change doesn’t have to mean more Catholic or less Catholic. That takes a very narrow view of Christ’s Church. Were the house churches in the early Roman Church less Catholic than that the grand Cathedrals of medevial times? Were the early Catholics that kept kosher less Catholic than later Catholics that abandoned the practice? At what point in history was the Church “most Catholic?”

Pope Benedict has spoken many times on the importance of growth and change, and explained that real growth is not moving toward or away from authentic Catholicism. The Truth does not change and God does not change, but the human institution that we call the Church has changed many times through history, and must do so. That change is needed now is obvious - surely no one that loves the Church thinks that the last century or two have gone well for her. How and when change should happen is something that serious Catholics should discuss, but its never been more obvioius that change is needed.
 
What does all of the above have to do with the sexual abuse scandals, which was the matter being addressed here?

My point was that if the issues you are referencing are relevant to the scandals, some evidence (facts and figures) needs to be produced to support that link.

None of your comments establish a relationship between clerical abuses and their poor handling by the church, most especially not when much of the abuse occurred before the negative changes you say have occurred.

I repeat, hijacking the current crisis and making it into a liberals vs. traditionalists debate is sad and a disservice to the victims of the abuse.
You know what? I am so tired of this liberal/traditional dichotomy and how each side blames the other, which results in absolutely nothing. I have never been able to understand how the “liberalization” of the Church is responsible for everything “bad” that ever happened in the history of the Church, most of which occurred long before Vatican 2.

You are entirely correct. I would like to see some real data and answers as to how this happened. I am not sure, of course, but I think that the sexual predation that the priest in my parish church was accused of (and also I can’t claim that he’s guilty but I knew the boys and I knew the priest and honestly, I have little doubt that he was indeed guilty) was going on before Vatican 2. It was going on in 1964 and I don’t think Vatican 2 had anything to do with this sick man preying on young boys.

It has gone on everywhere. I’m sure there is no organization, whether it be the BSA or any church, that is free of a history, however small, of pedophilia.

What I am mostly concerned with is why the priests who did what they did were allowed to continue as they did. All I’ve read (which is admittedly small) shows anger from the Vatican over the abuses and an effort to stop what was done in the past. I find this hopeful.

I’m also concerned with what is being done now to ensure this problem (and by that I mean “covering up”) will not happen again. It’s demoralizing to the clergy and laity, embarrassing to Catholics, and makes it appear that the Church hierarchy has little or no concern for the victims. By the hierarchy “looking the other way,” victims were ignored and either didn’t receive the help they needed or had to pay for that help themselves. That just is not right. It also has caused vast financial problems, such as in my parish when we needed a larger church and raised a lot of the money ourselves. It was all taken away by the diocese to provide settlements for those who were abused. We did finally get it back and now have our church, but it was touch and go there for awhile.

Pedophilia among Catholic priests is not going to stop. There will always be men who join organizations, including the Catholic Church, with their own agenda. But perhaps the incidence can be lowered by tightening the requirements to be met before one becomes a priest. And once a priest has been determined to be guilty of this horrendous crime, he should not be transferred to another parish and allowed to continue. He needs to be stopped.

And helped, if at all possible, along with his victims.

Holy Mother, please keep
all unborn children safe today.
 
The assumption is flawed. Change doesn’t have to mean more Catholic or less Catholic. That takes a very narrow view of Christ’s Church. Were the house churches in the early Roman Church less Catholic than that the grand Cathedrals of medevial times? Were the early Catholics that kept kosher less Catholic than later Catholics that abandoned the practice? At what point in history was the Church “most Catholic?”

Pope Benedict has spoken many times on the importance of growth and change, and explained that real growth is not moving toward or away from authentic Catholicism. The Truth does not change and God does not change, but the human institution that we call the Church has changed many times through history, and must do so. That change is needed now is obvious - surely no one that loves the Church thinks that the last century or two have gone well for her. How and when change should happen is something that serious Catholics should discuss, but its never been more obvioius that change is needed.
The changes that the holy father is advocating is not about modernization in the Church, it is not the kind of a change that is what is in the Church today.
it is not about priests abandoning their garments. it is not about priests interact wiht the people as if he was just one of us. it is not about ugly churches being built. it is not about people loosing their faith. which is exactly what is happening. make no mistake my friend things are much worse than we think. just yesterday, i was talking to my cousin in brazil, he was telling me that he went to Mass and all the priest talked about was raising money for some party. he is very dissapointed with what is going in the Church. and he has no experience with the Traditional Mass since this Mass in Brazil has been completely gone.

but this is not to make us desperate but it is to make us aware of the Truth. we must repent and return to God. this means to do things God’s ways and not our ways.
God says, “if my people repent and turn away from their sins…” this is the time for the pope and bishops and priest and the people together repent from all the offenses to our God. to have tempered wiht the Worship and everything else in His House. at least those who are faithfull to God must do that because those who have commited the offenses are probably going to continue doing it without any care that they are offending God.
the sins of desecration and profanity against the house of God shall not go unpunished.
 
The changes that the holy father is advocating is not about modernization in the Church, it is not the kind of a change that is what is in the Church today.
it is not about priests abandoning their garments. it is not about priests interact wiht the people as if he was just one of us. it is not about ugly churches being built. it is not about people loosing their faith. which is exactly what is happening. make no mistake my friend things are much worse than we think. just yesterday, i was talking to my cousin in brazil, he was telling me that he went to Mass and all the priest talked about was raising money for some party. he is very dissapointed with what is going in the Church. and he has no experience with the Traditional Mass since this Mass in Brazil has been completely gone.

but this is not to make us desperate but it is to make us aware of the Truth. we must repent and return to God. this means to do things God’s ways and not our ways.
God says, “if my people repent and turn away from their sins…” this is the time for the pope and bishops and priest and the people together repent from all the offenses to our God. to have tempered wiht the Worship and everything else in His House. at least those who are faithfull to God must do that because those who have commited the offenses are probably going to continue doing it without any care that they are offending God.
the sins of desecration and profanity against the house of God shall not go unpunished.
I don’t understand what the things you mention have to do with anything. Superficial changes in the way priests dress or the way they decorate their churches seem the least of anybody’s worries. Priests stumping for money from the pulpit has absolutely nothing to do with the form of the liturgy, or much else - I don’t like it either, but it happens now, it happened before Vatican II, its probably happened since early times.

I am also not sure what changes you feel the Pope is advocating. Mostly he seems to be advocating the changes made in Vatican II, with some corrections to misunderstandings of the changes and some tweaks around the edges.

In my opinion, the changes that are needed are much more basic, and cultural in the sense that the Church needs structural renewal and a change in institutional attitude. As I mentioned in my first post, these problems have been brewing for a long time - since way before Vatican II. The Church has grown increasingly clerical, and increasingly focused on ecclesiology. Who cares how priests dress or how the Church’s buildings are decorated? That is the kind of inward focus that has brought us to this point. The Church has been mostly concerned with the Church for far too long. That is what has to change.
 
hOW ABOUT PLAIN COMMON SENSE?
Prior to the deceptive liberalizing of the Church in 1962.The people were orthodox,priests and nuns were holy,masses were packed and there was great reverence for the True Presence.Since Vii the Church is a hollowed shell of what she once was.All the sexual “ethics” and ethos of the radical '60’s crept in and the cancer of homosexual predatory behaviour metatasised with virulent rapidity.A cancer that we have to root out of the church by recognising and correcting the deliberate liberal skewing of the teachings of the infallible VII.Get my drift?Pope Paul Vi said the Smoke of Satan had entered the Church and gee,when was he Pope?
The lack of orthodoxy was a if not THE causitive factor in the mishandling of this Satanic scandal.
For the last 40 years, the secular word issued propaganda statement after propaganda statement, accusing the Church and Catholics in general of being sexually repressed. Guess what? After Pope Paul VI had Humanae Vitae published in 1968, what did the dissidents inside the Church do? Took out a full page ad in the New York Times telling the world they disagreed with the Pope! Pope Paul VI tried to put the brakes on Catholics who were being told that The Pill would liberate them! It was freedom! Liberal theologians went beyond their proper authority and were telling Catholics it was their choice!

Throw in Adult Bookstores in the 1970s. It’s legal! Homosexuality is dropped from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual as a disorder in 1973 by nonscientific vote.

Is anyone connecting the dots yet? Dissidents inside and outside of the Church combined for a planned attack in the time period 1968 to 1973 that laid the groundwork for what we have today

For years, starting in the late 1960s, all I heard was that the Church was a repressive organization. That is why some Hippies dropped marriage, just had sex with whoever and smoked dope. The Establishment, mom, dad, priests and nuns knew nothing! Got that? The media joined the act which is why we have profanity, pimps and prostitutes on TV today.

The media culture gradually took us by the hand in 1968. Trust us! Try it our way. You’ll like it. And at that time, Catholics were more trusting of strangers and outsiders. We were lied to every step of the way.

There will be no culture change in the Church. We need to get rid of the porn, reject radical feminist thinking, protest outside of the strip clubs and understand that organized crime, a handful of judges and a small group of anarchist radicals rearranged this country to their way of thinking and living. Wake up my fellow Catholics. In the past, legal usually meant moral, today they want to legalize sin.

The Barbarians are inside the gates. We must reject the majority of the anti-Christian and unGodly culture they created. Now.

God bless,
Ed

Choose Jesus.
 
Before we moralise to ithers we must first learn to practice what we preach…Jesus preached forgiveness, repentance and love…Do we ?
 
Before we moralise to ithers we must first learn to practice what we preach…Jesus preached forgiveness, repentance and love…Do we ?
What did He say to the woman who was about to be stoned for adultery after He forgave her? “Go and sin no more.”

That radical idea must be embraced by each Catholic.

God bless,
Ed

Choose Jesus.
 
Jesus also says
In as much as you do it to these my children you do it to me
love your enemies do good to those who hate you
turn the other cheek

Where in present day Chritianity are these messages of peaceful coexistence, love, forgiveness and the defence of the innocent priorities over dress, dogma and abuses ??
We open ourselves to our critics by failing to listen to the words of Jesus…
 
Judas fell from grace, but the Church marched on after… on wards Christian soldiers, have we forgotten our Confirmation pledge.

We are soldiers of Christ, we may have lost a few battles, but we haven’t lost the war, the war against the old enemy, satan and his followers.

If God is with us, who can be against us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top