X
Xavier
Guest
Mickey said:You tell him Church Militant!smileys.smileycentral.com/cus/e_1_37.gif
The blind leading the blind



Mickey said:You tell him Church Militant!smileys.smileycentral.com/cus/e_1_37.gif
Precisely! The reason we Catholics truly have honor for things we can see and feel, etc., has to do with the Incarnation in that Catholicism understands and appreciates the reality of the Incarnation, whereas most of Protestantism merely pays it lip service without truly appreciating what it means for God to have become Man; as St. Paul says of Christ: “He is the visible image of the invisible God; and so in seeing Him we are caught up in love for the God we cannot see.”With the Incarnation, the Image of God acquired a human face. What had been “un-imageable” becomes matter, and via the Incarnation, matter becomes, in a particular and living way, sanctified to the experience of the holy.
You are a mind reader X! I was just about to post this for you:The blind leading the blind![]()
![]()
![]()
Whew! What a beautiful exposition. We must also remember – I believe it was mentioned earlier on this endless thread – that the iconoclastic heresies were fueled by Islamic influence. When the Seventh Ecumenical Council affirmed the use of images, the Empress Theodora led the procession of images back into the churches on the First Sunday of Lent, which is to this day known as “the feast of orthodoxy.”Precisely! The reason we Catholics truly have honor for things we can see and feel, etc., has to do with the Incarnation in that Catholicism understands and appreciates the reality of the Incarnation, whereas most of Protestantism merely pays it lip service without truly appreciating what it means for God to have become Man; as St. Paul says of Christ: “He is the visible image of the invisible God; and so in seeing Him we are caught up in love for the God we cannot see.”
This situation (the Incarnation) changes everything. It shows that the New Covenant in Christ is different from God’s Covenant with Israel. In the Christian Covenant, we have Emmanuel (“God-with-us”), and, therefore, not only Christ’s Incarnation reflects the glory of the Father, but also the Church – the extension of Christ’s Incarnation (i.e., the Body of Christ) – reflects God’s glory. Thus Mary and the other Saints who reflect Christ, thereby reflect the Father’s glory; and so, images of Christ and the Saints are at the service of this incarnational glory of God; and the law against “graven images” is turned against itself in Christ.
Under the Old Law the Israelites were not to make graven images because no earthly creation could reflect the glory of God. Yet, after the Incarnation, this is possible, but only in Christ and in His Saints – those who are part of His Body.
So, the key to understanding Catholic iconography is to appreciate the reality of Christ’s Incarnation. In rejecting the legitimacy of icons and other religious images, the Protestant world comes very close to rejecting the Incarnation Itself. Indeed, Christ became FLESH in order to save FLESH (us). If everything is merely spiritual, why did Jesus need to come in the flesh at all??
We all know GOD is spirit.God is spirit. Mental images block and hamper true worship, that is why there is a prohibition on all idols.
Sorry to disapoiint you, but my training wheels were gone long before you were born.This is like asking you to take off you training wheels. It is something which Catholics, for the most part, refuse to do. :crying:
Yes, it’s simple, and the Catholics here understand how that is so.Its real simple, but folks refuse to see it.
Are you referring to yourself?The blind leading the blind.
**This kind of remark is outright insulting.The blind leading the blind![]()
![]()
![]()