P
pete_29
Guest
Don’t call before 9 AM.Got your number!!!
Don’t call before 9 AM.Got your number!!!
Man is unique. We have a brain that allows us to design the tools we need.God **did not **make us predators. Please read Genesis. Our eyes are forward facing (binocular vision), as are other primates, for grasping branches and picking fruit from trees. Our teeth **are not **designed to eat meat. All animals by design have all their equipment attached to their bodies.
My brain has led me to make a connection between what I eat and my faith. Today, in the United States, the way the vast majority of animals that are raised for food are raised in CAFO environments (ucsusa.org/news/press_release/cafo-costs-report-0113.html)Man is unique. We have a brain that allows us to design the tools we need.
Perhaps some would be more comfortable if we didn’t use our brains.![]()
And apparently the cat’s too.If it is said that she was thinking with her heart–yes, she was–but that does not make her heart wrong. Her heart, is ahead of its time–
I do not ask that you watch the video “with your heart,” but rather that you take notice of your heart’s reaction. Does watching the video excite you? Make you uncomfortable? Do you feel empathy or mercy for this animal? Do you feel nothing? How you react personally is then for you to decide how this will affect your actions or choices, or if you can dismiss what you saw and walk away.This is the kind of behavior one can expect when people quit using their brains and instead use their emotions.
This call I have read several times to watch the video ‘with your heart’ is nothing more then a call to emotionalism.
Yeah, I really didn’t care about the video one way or the other.I do not ask that you watch the video “with your heart,” but rather that you take notice of your heart’s reaction. Does watching the video excite you? Make you uncomfortable? Do you feel empathy or mercy for this animal? Do you feel nothing? How you react personally is then for you to decide how this will affect your actions or choices, or if you can dismiss what you saw and walk away.
What keeps me coming back is this, I desire to defend myself. The entire premise of this thread is people who eat meat are morally and ethically below those who do not eat meat. This is completely fallacious and is a personal attack against anyone who eats meat. If you don’t want to eat meat, no one should make you feel guilty for that and no one should even attempt to impose guilt on you. If you do want to eat mat, no one should make you feel guilty for that and no one should even attempt to impose guilt on you for that.If you can dismiss the video, if you feel nothing at seeing it, I would imagine that you would not even take the time to post in this thread. “Feeling nothing” should make it quite easy to walk away from this thread. So what has you coming back, for repeated looks?
**Have you ever learned something that you think is important and you want to share that with others? **The entire premise of this thread is people who eat meat are morally and ethically below those who do not eat meat. This is completely fallacious and is a personal attack against anyone who eats meat. If you don’t want to eat meat, no one should make you feel guilty for that and no one should even attempt to impose guilt on you. If you do want to eat mat, no one should make you feel guilty for that and no one should even attempt to impose guilt on you for that.
**Have you ever learned something that you think is important and you want to share that with others? **
I don’t believe anyone on this thread (oh, wait - I should only speak for myself) -…
I don’t judge anyone who has chosen to eliminate meat from their diet as moral superior.
I don’t judge anyone who chooses to continue to eat meat as morally inferior.
When I’ve learned about this topic it has become important to me, (resonates with my faith) and I want to share this with others, especially with others with whom I share this beautiful common bond of faith.
I think we can all sound judgmental (on both sides of this point, i.e. what is the matter with you - why don’t you feel like I do? / what is the matter with you - why do you put so much importance on this?)
I believe it is important - and keep coming back to try to share what I’ve learned. I think the original post was also trying to share why this is important because it touched her heart - and invited others to consider the possibility…
So… here I share something so beautiful I found today that I think is relevant:
*
“The brutal consumption of creation begins where God is not, where matter is henceforth only material for us, where we ourselves are the ultimate demand, where the whole is merely our property and we consume it for ourselves alone … I think, therefore, that true and effective initiatives to prevent the waste and destruction of creation can be implemented and developed, understood and lived, only where creation is considered as beginning with God.”*
—Pope Benedict XVI, August 2008
A clear statement that those who eat meat are being disrespectful of God’s creation. What was you’re reaction to this 4elise?BEEF its what’s for dinner…No thanks. This is not respect for God’s creation.
So, 4elise you think that I am being disrespectful to God’s creation and I’m not supposed to interpret this as you saying that those who do not eat meat are morally superior?I second this kennewickmike! Not for me or my family.
What about when people post in support of uncharitable statements, as I showed you doing above?When people respond uncharitably it is very difficult not to question their motivation too. Is it possible to simply post that one disagrees with the conclusion that another has made?
And what kind of an impact does this have on the people working in the industry, besides making it so they can keep a roof over their heads and feed their family. Would you be implying there is a negative moral impact on people simply by working in this industry? If there is a negative moral impact on those who work in this industry, and I continue to consume the product of that industry, doesn’t that say that I am not loving my neighbor?I just chose to try to eliminate use of animal products as much as possible. Not just in response to cruelty issues, but also resources, environmental impact, impact on people working in this industry.
So, anyone who isn’t moved by this video is in possession of a diseased, closed, darkened heart. This is a horrible thing for one person to say about another person. Let’s now look at how strongly 4elise condemned this attack on me and those like me.I see that one of the tags for this thread is heart disease. Consumption of animal products contributes to heart disease. And what kind of heart can not be moved to mercy by that video? A diseased one, a closed one, a darkened one…
So now you wish to accuse me of crying ‘emotionalism’I do not ask that you watch the video “with your heart,” but rather that you take notice of your heart’s reaction…Men often accuse women of emotionalism when they do not know how to communicate with them–when they fail to control the woman or her dialog–they cry “emotionalism.”
I bolded the part in case it was missed.I encourage all who watch this video to turn your brains off for a second and experience what is in your heart.
Drawmack - when I first read this my first reaction was to come back with a kind of immature ‘naa-uh’ - argue each point you made trying to clarify how I wasn’t trying to come across morally superior or casting judgment on you for eating meat.And this 4elise is just from the first two pages of this thread. So take your hypocrisy elsewhere, I don’t need it.
Not so, I have responded to your statements, so have others.Because for this entire thread not one single person has actually addressed a single argument I’ve made.
If you can’t entertain a thought experiment in your head, then you won’t go far in philosophical matters.The point of every single post is ignored and people do ridiculous things like talking about aliens taking over the world.
No, people have used all three types of argument here; ethos, pathos and logos. No one has personified or anthropomorphized any animal on this thread.People want to make purely emotional appeals and then tell me to watch with my “heart” instead of my intellect. But then at the same time are personifying the animal’s intellect.
Well, when you write that someone’s statement is stupid, you’re implying that they are stupid. That’s an ad hominem. This post is** not about you**. It’s about the ethical right to raise animals in factory farms and slaughter them.I get accused of making ad hominem attacks in a thread whose entire premise is that if I eat meat then I am morally worse than someone who doesn’t.
See, there you go again, telling me to STFU. If you are not going to follow the constitutive rules of argumentation, then this whole dialogue is pointless. Are you really trying to seek truth, or are you merely engaging in rhetoric?Either support your points with logic and refute the points I’m making the same way to just STFU, go hug a tree, and leave me in peace.
You assume too much. I eat meat, when it is offered. This is not about moral superiority. This is not some kind of moral pissing match. It’s about awareness of factory farming and abattoir conditions. It’s about asking ethical questions. That’s why videos like this one keep getting posted. No one is looking down on meat eaters as morally or ethically inferior. Think of it as different levels of awareness, just like there are people at different levels of Christian faith.I mean seriously, you want to act all morally superior because you don’t eat meat, fine act all morally superior because you don’t eat meat. It doesn’t matter to me one little bit - I simply do not care what you eat. But remember that the Bible tells us we will be judged by the standards we have judged.
Good question, and I’ll never know the answer. This happened many years ago. I can only suppose that she loved to be around animals and couldn’t cuddle a goat or something. But you’re right, why keep a cat if you have problems with feeding it a meat based diet?Snert: Why would someone not eat meat because they care for animals or feel compassion and empathy for them, and then keep a carnivorous animal as a pet, and feed it an improper diet and cause it to suffer???
I totally agree with you on this.Good question, and I’ll never know the answer. This happened many years ago. I can only suppose that she loved to be around animals and couldn’t cuddle a goat or something. But you’re right, why keep a cat if you have problems with feeding it a meat based diet?![]()
chain: where is your heart? It doesn’t matter where the video is from. How do you ***feel ***when you watch it? Does it excite you? Do you wish this weren’t so? Is it painful to watch? Do you feel nothing? Let us all be honest in our core reactions. If you are uncomfortable watching this, does that feeling not indicate that you should perhaps examine the situation with a little more thought?
I’ll keep this short and simple. You applaud when someone else says that I have a diseased, closed, and darkened heart – you have said that you agree that my heart is diseased, closed, and darkened – you have said this person is worthy of praise for saying those things about my heart. To come back latter and say you’re not being judgmental, to come back latter and try to make nice is hypocrisy. It’s that simple.Drawmack - when I first read this my first reaction was to come back with a kind of immature ‘naa-uh’ - argue each point you made trying to clarify how I wasn’t trying to come across morally superior or casting judgment on you for eating meat.
But than I thought I ought to sit with this a while -
First, I want you to know that it is only in the last several years that I learned about CAFOs and the environmental damage that is a result that has drawn me to make a commitment to ‘go vegan’ - before that I was as much a carnivore as anyone
Second, I have family members, and a couple adult children who do not make this choice - they eat meat, I love them, and I do not judge them to be morally inferior.
You had noted in a previous post that no one should make another feel guilty for their choice to either eat meat or not eat meat. I think that this is ‘in the eye of the beholder’ - I shouldn’t be able to make anyone feel guilty - that is a personal reaction.
I can agree that not eating meat is a better choice for God’s creation - then one who doesn’t make that choice might hear *“then you are saying I don’t care about God’s creation?” *
I can agree that it lines up with someone’s faith - because it does for mine - then one who doesn’t agree might hear 'then you are saying my faith isn’t as good as yours?"
So for clarity what I am saying is I chose not to eat meat because of what I’ve learned about how meat, dairy, eggs are produced in the US, and giving it up resonates with my understanding of my Catholic faith.
Because you are also Catholic (and this is a Catholic forum) I may try to “persuade” you to see where I’ve seen this connection, but not in judgment if you do or don’t - that is up to you.
I hope we can disagree and not judge each other,![]()
Flat out untruth. Claiming that a cow is affraid it’s going to die is a personification of that cow. Period!No, people have used all three types of argument here; ethos, pathos and logos. No one has personified or anthropomorphized any animal on this thread.
Not true. I say stupid things all the time, it doesn’t mean that I’m stupid, it means that I spoke without engaging my brain. Which I do quite a bit.Well, when you write that someone’s statement is stupid, you’re implying that they are stupid. That’s an ad hominem. This post is** not about you**. It’s about the ethical right to raise animals in factory farms and slaughter them.
I was asked why I was testy, I answered, you are telling me that my answer is rhetoric, who isn’t following the constitutive rules of argumentation?See, there you go again, telling me to STFU. If you are not going to follow the constitutive rules of argumentation, then this whole dialogue is pointless. Are you really trying to seek truth, or are you merely engaging in rhetoric?
Animals have emotions, fear is one of them. This is an indisputable fact.Flat out untruth. Claiming that a cow is affraid it’s going to die is a personification of that cow. Period!
Granted.Not true. I say stupid things all the time, it doesn’t mean that I’m stupid, it means that I spoke without engaging my brain. Which I do quite a bit.
The first constitutive rule of argumentation is the truth seeking principle. That means you are “committed to searching for the truth or the most rationally defensible position about the issues… violation of this subverts the very purpose of argumentation.” Saindon, J. (2008). Argument and argumentation, Toronto: Thomson Nelson.I was asked why I was testy, I answered, you are telling me that my answer is rhetoric, who isn’t following the constitutive rules of argumentation?
Animals have emotions, fear is one of them. This is an indisputable fact.[/qutoe]
Correct. It’s called fight or flight and it exists even in insects. Predators usually choose fight and prey usually choose flight. The personification happens when you presuppose a why into their fear instead of simply observing that they are afraid.
The argument principle can entail two arguers that tentatively agree “for the sake of argument” to some proposition. For example, my analogy of aliens harvesting humans for food, which you dismissed out of hand.