Death penalty and purpose of punishment

  • Thread starter Thread starter iluvburpees
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
crazzeto I think you have paraphrased a significant error within this latest Catechism:

crazzeto writes:

“After all, Christ didn’t come into the world to damn it, but to save it. Better to offer these people as much time as possible to repent.”

2267: “without definitively taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself”.

The Catechism finds that we should end the death penalty in order to provide alternate sanctions “without definitively taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself” (2267)

First, the Catechism states, above, that the wrongdoer redeems himself. The biblical/theological realities find that all wrongdoers can/should seek redemption, but that God provides redemption to the wrongdoer by His grace. Wrongdoers can only seek redemption, they cannot provide it to themselves.

Secondly, the Church is, hereby, stating that the death penalty is “taking away from him (the executed party) the possibility of redeeming himself”. (2267)

The Catechism is stating that the God invoked sanction of death takes away the possibility of redemption. Think about that. There is nothing to defend such a claim, in such a context.

All of our sins have us die “early”. Is there a case, whereby God has erased the possibility of our redemption, solely because of our earthly and “early” deaths? Such an interpretation is, in context, flatly, against God’s message and cannot stand.

The biblical record, its interpretations, the Magesterium and virtually all knowledgeable Christian scholars and laymen, Catholic or not, find that the universal blessing that God gives us is that we all have the opportunity of being redeemed “before we die”. The death penalty does not/cannot take that away anymore than does a car wreck, cancer, old age or any other “earthly” and “early” death, meaning all deaths, because of our sins. We all die “early” because of our sins.

It is as if the Church had, completely, forgotten the meaning of St. Dismas’ death, his words exchanged with Jesus and the promise to come. (7)

The Catechism, wrongly, finds that all “early” deaths, meaning all earthly deaths, negate the possibility of our being redeemed. Such is an astonishing claim, if not much worse.

In God’s perfection, we suffer an “early” death, because of our sins. The Catechism wrongly tells us that our “early” deaths takes away the possibility of our being redeemed. It can’t and does not. God gives all of us the opportunity of redemption, in His grace, before our earthly and early deaths, no matter what that death may be.

This newest Catechism cannot rewrite that, even though it is trying to.

Furthermore, a unique benefit of the death penalty is that the offender knows the day of their death and therefore has a huge advantage over the rest of us and, most certainly over the innocent murder victim.

“. . . a secondary measure of the love of God may be said to appear. For capital punishment provides the murderer with incentive to repentance which the ordinary man does not have, that is a definite date on which he is to meet his God. It is as if God thus providentially granted him a special inducement to repentance out of consideration of the enormity of his crime . . . the law grants to the condemned an opportunity which he did not grant to his victim, the opportunity to prepare to meet his God. Even divine justice here may be said to be tempered with mercy.” Carey agrees with Saints Augustine and Aquinas, that executions represent mercy to the wrongdoer: (p. 116). Quaker biblical scholar Dr. Gervas A. Carey. A Professor of Bible and past President of George Fox College, Essays on the Death Penalty, T. Robert Ingram, ed., St. Thomas Press, Houston, 1963, 1992

St. Thomas Aquinas: “The fact that the evil, as long as they live, can be corrected from their errors does not prohibit the fact that they may be justly executed, for the danger which threatens from their way of life is greater and more certain than the good which may be expected from their improvement. They also have at that critical point of death the opportunity to be converted to God through repentance. And if they are so stubborn that even at the point of death their heart does not draw back from evil, it is possible to make a highly probable judgement that they would never come away from evil to the right use of their powers.” Summa Contra Gentiles, Book III, 146.
 
In light of the California Bishops decision on the death penalty - here is a new string on the issue:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=7115161#post7115161
The bishops offer nothing new in their opposition; they merely repeat the same arguments. More accurately, they merely repeat the same allegations, they present no argument to support any of them. Take these examples:

*“we implore all Californians to ask themselves what good comes of state-sanctioned killing.”

*The answer is obviously the application of a punishment commensurate with the severity of the crime which satisfies the obligation of a State to render justice.

*“However, nothing can undo what was done — even taking the life of the convicted killer.”

*Neither does a sentence of life without parole. This is a totally spurious complaint.
*
“We believe that each human person is created in God’s image.” *

And we know that from Gen 9:6 … where it is explicitly given as the reason for murderers to be executed.

“In addition, of particular concern to us is the fact that the application of the death penalty is deeply flawed — with those who are poor or from racial minorities most often its subjects.”

Assume for a moment that this is true. Nowhere is the charge made that those who were sentenced to death weren’t guilty, only that others who were also guilty received lighter punishments. What logic does it make to say that the solution to inadequate sentences for some is to prescribe inadequate sentences for all?

The bishops make no informed defense of their position because none is available.

Ender
 
Ender,

I pretty much agree with everything you have said. However, out of Holy Obedience, I am left with only accepting what the Bishops have said and not being for the death penalty even though I see nothing morally wrong with it.
 
I pretty much agree with everything you have said. However, out of Holy Obedience, I am left with only accepting what the Bishops have said and not being for the death penalty even though I see nothing morally wrong with it.
I find no fault with your position. For myself, however, I find no fault in dissenting based on comments like these:

“There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty” (Cardinal Ratzinger)

"The Pope and the bishops, using their prudential judgment, have concluded that in contemporary society, at least in countries like our own,the death penalty ought not to be invoked, because, on balance, it does more harm than good." (Cardinal Dulles)

"Their prudential judgment, while it is to be respected, is not a matter of binding Catholic doctrine. To differ from such a judgment, therefore, is not to dissent from Church teaching." (Cardinal Dulles)

On this issue we are justified in deciding for ourselves, and based on everything I have discovered I believe that 2267 is, as Dulles said, a prudential conclusion about the use of the death penalty in contemporary society. The consistent teaching of the Church about its use is, however, in opposition to the arguments used to defend 2267 as a change in doctrine.

Ender
 
These bishops who cite the stat that blacks are disproportionally sentenced to death in capital crimes miss the point that according to the U S Justice Department, blacks **COMMIT over 50% of the murders **in the US…of course since the anti death penalty folks like to use the race card, the truth seems to escape them…Here are the
the facts … blacks are about 12 % of the population, but they COMMIT over 50% of the murders…

bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm
 
These bishops who cite the stat that blacks are disproportionally sentenced to death in capital crimes miss the point that according to the U S Justice Department, blacks **COMMIT over 50% of the murders **in the US…of course since the anti death penalty folks like to use the race card, the truth seems to escape them…Here are the
the facts … blacks are about 12 % of the population, but they COMMIT over 50% of the murders…

bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm
You haven’t followed your logic all the way through here. Of those blacks who commit 50% of the murders, they are MUCH more likely to be given the Death Penalty than the other 50% of non-blacks who commit murder. This has nothing to do with your out of date 12% statistic.

The fact of the matter that the death penalty can never be justly applied 100% of the time by man - whether in America, China, Iran, or wherever man is falliable and biased - associatedcontent.com/article/5786442/three_reasons_why_capital_punishment.html?cat=34
 
blacks are 12.9 % of the population…you need to read before you criticize…
and check the fact that there are MANY MANY more whites that are victims of black murder crime than there are blacks victim of white murder crime…so get off the race card…
It doesnt work anymore !!!
quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm
Why do you think I am playing a race card? Because I am black? LOL

Look, you were wrong about the 12% - it was 12.9% - even if you were to round off, you would have rounded up not down.

Also you are wrong about race when it comes to death row - just read this site.
[The Death Penalty in Black and White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides | Death Penalty Information Center Bias Permeates the System](http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-penalty-black-and-white-who-lives-who-dies-who-decides#Racial Bias Permeates the System)

No race card being played sir - don’t need to - these are the facts. I checked your pages - now read the facts.
 
You can have your own opinion but not your own FACTS. The California Bishops letter (which is what we are discussing) mentions race disparity. The facts show that blacks commit nearly half of the murders in this nation. The facts show that blacks are not half the population, but are 12.9 per cent. Read about the problem with black murder rate.
"As of 2008, statistics report as that of 16,277 murders, 10,568 were committed by males, 1,176 were by female, and 4,533 were committed in which the offenders sex was unknown. Likewise, 5,334 murders where committed by white offenders, 5,943 were committed by black or black and Hispanic offenders, 273 were committed by offenders of other races, and 4,727 murders were committed by offenders whom race is not known. "
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States
 
The fact of the matter that the death penalty can never be justly applied 100% of the time by man
It is much less important that the death penalty be applied to everyone who deserves it than that it is deserved by everyone to whom it is applied. If the people who are executed deserved their punishment then the argument that they shouldn’t have been executed because others who equally deserved it were not equally punished is without merit. If we get punishment half right and half wrong by failing to execute some who deserve it surely it cannot be considered reasonable to suggest that it is somehow better to get the punishment wrong in every case by not executing any who have earned such punishment.

Ender
 
You can have your own opinion but not your own FACTS. The California Bishops letter (which is what we are discussing) mentions race disparity. The facts show that blacks commit nearly half of the murders in this nation. The facts show that blacks are not half the population, but are 12.9 per cent. Read about the problem with black murder rate.
"As of 2008, statistics report as that of 16,277 murders, 10,568 were committed by males, 1,176 were by female, and 4,533 were committed in which the offenders sex was unknown. Likewise, 5,334 murders where committed by white offenders, 5,943 were committed by black or black and Hispanic offenders, 273 were committed by offenders of other races, and 4,727 murders were committed by offenders whom race is not known. "
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States
I don’t see why you can’t understand the Bishop’s concern. It is as simple at this - if 10 black men and 10 white men go on trial for murder more of the black men are going to get the death penalty than white men due to a number of social, economic, and environmental factors. That is disparity

I don’t claim to be an authority on this issue - my degrees are in business, but this is an area that I am very familiar with and I think this article point to the issue very clearly. 👍
[The Death Penalty in Black and White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides | Death Penalty Information Center Bias Permeates the System](http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-penalty-black-and-white-who-lives-who-dies-who-decides#Racial Bias Permeates the System)
 
yosephdavid:

White murderers are twice as likely to be executed as black murderers.

Please review:

“Death Penalty Sentencing: No Systemic Bias”
prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2009/07/death-penalty-sentencing-no-systemic.html
Interesting - I don’t buy any of those points -they don’t hold up to my experience and I have a lot of experience with this issue. That does not mean that my experience is right and their research is wrong, but what I have seen and experienced is in contraction to the points they make. Moreover, some of their points are just silly - like “the black/white variation in sentencing has generally been reduced to zero when such legal variables are introduced as controls.:” That makes no sense whatsoever! The variables they speak of here ARE THE PROBLEM. Phd’s say the dumbest things sometimes!

Here is one article are slaps theirs in the face - [The Death Penalty in Black and White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides | Death Penalty Information Center Bias Permeates the System](http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-penalty-black-and-white-who-lives-who-dies-who-decides#Racial Bias Permeates the System)
 
It is much less important that the death penalty be applied to everyone who deserves it than that it is deserved by everyone to whom it is applied. If the people who are executed deserved their punishment then the argument that they shouldn’t have been executed because others who equally deserved it were not equally punished is without merit. If we get punishment half right and half wrong by failing to execute some who deserve it surely it cannot be considered reasonable to suggest that it is somehow better to get the punishment wrong in every case by not executing any who have earned such punishment.

Ender
Reasonable logic Ender. We just disagree on what people deserve. I believe that they deserve a full opportunity to come to the knowledge of truth (Jesus Christ) - and that is the only point of living a full natural human life. No one deserves anything less than knowing Jesus Christ regardless of the sins that they have committed in their life; for, if they had known and loved Him they more than likely would not have sinned as they did.

As soon as we begin to see the face of Jesus Christ on every human being we will stop murdering and harming one another. As soon as we start seeing the face of Jesus Christ on every human being we will start loving them as they deserve. 👍
 
“As soon as we begin to see the face of Jesus Christ on every human being we will stop murdering and harming one another.”
Truly admirable, nice, happy talk.
Meanwhile, we have murderers who are allowed to get out of prison and murder again…what do you say to these…
“Sorry??”
wesleylowe.com/repoff.html

and your statement about social, and other “factors” are not demonstrable or provable. You get a predominantly black jury and I can tell you its extra tough to convict a black guy, even with excellent proof beyond any doubt… They “soul brother” you. I was a prosecutor, I know what I am talking about
 
I don’t see why you can’t understand the Bishop’s concern. It is as simple at this - if 10 black men and 10 white men go on trial for murder more of the black men are going to get the death penalty than white men due to a number of social, economic, and environmental factors. That is disparity
Assume this is true. What are you complaining about: that we aren’t executing enough whites? You have made no claim that the blacks who were executed didn’t deserve their punishment so it seems that your position is that we should solve the “problem” of executing too few of the whites who deserve this punishment by executing too few of the blacks who deserve it. Disparity is irrelevant; what is relevant is whether people get the punishment they deserve and it is a poor solution to the problem of inadequate sentencing for some to apply inadequate sentencing for all.

Ender
 
“As soon as we begin to see the face of Jesus Christ on every human being we will stop murdering and harming one another.”
Truly admirable, nice, happy talk.
Meanwhile, we have murderers who are allowed to get out of prison and murder again…what do you say to these…
“Sorry??”
wesleylowe.com/repoff.html

and your statement about social, and other “factors” are not demonstrable or provable. You get a predominantly black jury and I can tell you its extra tough to convict a black guy, even with excellent proof beyond any doubt… They “soul brother” you. I was a prosecutor, I know what I am talking about
What do I say to murderers getting out and murdering again? First thing I would point out is that it usually doesn’t happen. Most people who get released from prison for murder do not murder again. Women who commit abortions and pedeofiles (spelling) are far more likely repeaters than most people in prison in for murder, simply because most of those indicents of murder occured in the heat of the moment - not premeditated. Secondly, life in prison is an option for people who have shown that they need to be kept out of society.

As for your second point - you agree with me. (1) Man is falliable and biased, and (2) The article I posted from Death Penalty Info is your proof that people who are represented by public defenders and judged by a jury not of thier peers are more likely to get the death penalty. If you were a prosecutor you already know this. I am sure your mouth started drooling whenever you had to face the public defender in a trial. LOL

As far as “they soul brother you”. Offensive language, but I forgive you. 👍 The fact of the matter is that the white kids will always sit with the white kids in the lunch room and the black kids will sit with the black kids. People are unemployed right now and blacks and mexicans are unemployed at a higher percentage. People have always looked out for people who they identify with, whether it be skin color, religion, alamater, or hometown. Doesn’t make it right, but it just proves my point that man is falliable and biased. Therefore, capital punishment is always flawed.
 
Don’t “forgive me.” There is nothing to “forgive.” You know what that means apparently. You are not “offended,” …only sensitive’
 
Assume this is true. What are you complaining about: that we aren’t executing enough whites? You have made no claim that the blacks who were executed didn’t deserve their punishment so it seems that your position is that we should solve the “problem” of executing too few of the whites who deserve this punishment by executing too few of the blacks who deserve it. Disparity is irrelevant; what is relevant is whether people get the punishment they deserve and it is a poor solution to the problem of inadequate sentencing for some to apply inadequate sentencing for all.

Ender
On the contrary; my point has always been that captial punishment needs to be replaced by love and mercy. A murderer, child molestor, rapist, or whatever saved by Christ is far better than another murderer, molestor, rapist, or whatever in Hell. This is a hard saying for some of you self-righteous folk who never sinned, but Jesus loves you as much as he loves some of your priests who fooled with young boys. He wants us all in Heaven. Therefore, offer love and mercy rather than violence, revenge and flawed justice.
— end with Ender

— Talking to everyone now
Also take some responsiblity! The reason you have so many people on death row is becuase you were not doing your job as a Christian - going out and sharing the gospel. So just because you failed them once, doesn’t mean you fail them again by murdering them. Go visit Jesus in prison and share the good news there. I don’t understand how you guys are so gunho about murdering people and not one of you are brazen enough to pull the switch or inject the needle. All this tough talk coming from some guys tapping keys on a keyboard. Really? LOL Give me a break! Most of you wouldn’t last a day in prison, but you want to kill everybody in there. Cowards! Go love on Jesus in prison instead of trying to kill Jesus in prison. 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top