December Republican Primary Poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ouch! Mitt Romney attacks Newt Gingrich for $500,000 Tiffany’s bill

“Mitt Romney went for the diamond ring in an interview with Sean Hannity on his radio show… saying that he was surprised Newt Gingrich mocked his $10,000 bet line on the campaign trail “given a $500,000 bill at Tiffany’s,”… In an interview with CBS News’s Jan Crawford today, he expanded on that theme: “Newt Gingrich has wealth from having worked in government. He’s a wealthy man, a very wealthy man. If you have a half a million dollar purchase from Tiffany’s, you’re not a middle-class American.”” - Politico

I think that is a silly attack on Gingrich, after all Romney himself is a rich man.

““Zany is not what we need in a president,” Mr. Romney said. “Zany is great in a campaign. It’s great on talk radio. It’s great in print, it makes for fun reading, but in terms of a president, we need a leader, and a leader needs to be someone who can bring Americans together.”” - New York Times

Washington Examiner endorses Mitt Romney

“[T]he leitmotif of the Republican race so far has been the search for the “anti-Romney.” … They have been searching for a candidate who shared their conservative principles, who had strength of character, and who, above all, could beat Barack Obama. We believe this candidate has been hiding in plain sight. Mitt Romney is not “too perfect,” as some political analysts have argued, but he is perfect enough.” - Washington Examiner editorial

National Review editors warn against voting for Newt: “If he is the nominee, a campaign that should be about whether the country will continue on the path to social democracy would inevitably become to a large extent a referendum on Gingrich instead.”

Candidates tout pro-life credentials at Mike Huckabee event

“Television show host and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee praised the four presidential candidates who made it a “priority” to attend the premiere of his anti-abortion film in Iowa. Before “The Gift of Life” documentary, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum delivered seven-minute speeches on their anti-abortion agendas. … The audience erupted with applause when Gingrich said he would, among other things, bring back the so-called “right to conscience” policy issued under President George W. Bush.” - CNN

“Mike Huckabee said he would not be a kingmaker for the GOP in the next three week and told ABC News he would not endorse any candidate before the Iowa caucuses on January 3, and that he may not back anyone before the primary fight ends.” - ABC News

Karl Rove: The large number of debates have made this the least predictable race in decades - WSJ ($)

Sen. Marco Rubio continues to lead the field of potential VP picks

“Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida tops a list of potential GOP running mates in a national survey by Fairleigh Dickinson University in New Jersey. He edges out Rep. Michele Bachmann, who is waging her own fight to become the party’s standard bearer, on the VP list.” - USA Today

Gary Johnson drops out of the 2012 Republican race to run for the Libertarian Party - Newsmax

House GOP challenges Obama to use public funding for his 2012 election campaign

“A group of House Republicans issued a challenge to President Obama today: Use public funds for your 2012 re-election campaign or quit opposing GOP efforts to end the program. … Earlier this month, the GOP-controlled House voted to end the program, funded by a $3 checkoff on federal income-tax forms. … The Obama administration has voiced strong opposition to the provision, saying killing the program would expand “the power of corporations and special interests in the nation’s elections.”” - USA Today

Romney Raises $2 Million in New York City - TownHall

Ron Paul is another John McCain. He can’t win. His foreign policy stances are crazy. When he stands up to talk he stutters on and on, making it up as he goes along. Not only that he says things out of the blue that are dangerous. Obama will egg him on just to get him to look like he needs his pills and it will probably work.
 
Ron Paul is another John McCain. He can’t win. His foreign policy stances are crazy. When he stands up to talk he stutters on and on, making it up as he goes along. Not only that he says things out of the blue that are dangerous. Obama will egg him on just to get him to look like he needs his pills and it will probably work.
Yes, it’s crazy to not be nosy and not want to intervene in other countries affairs.
 
Ouch! Mitt Romney attacks Newt Gingrich for $500,000 Tiffany’s bill

“Mitt Romney went for the diamond ring in an interview with Sean Hannity on his radio show… saying that he was surprised Newt Gingrich mocked his $10,000 bet line on the campaign trail “given a $500,000 bill at Tiffany’s,”… In an interview with CBS News’s Jan Crawford today, he expanded on that theme: “Newt Gingrich has wealth from having worked in government. He’s a wealthy man, a very wealthy man. If you have a half a million dollar purchase from Tiffany’s, you’re not a middle-class American.”” - Politico

**I think that is a silly attack on Gingrich, after all Romney himself is a rich man. **
Is it any sillier than Gingrich mocking Romney about the $10,000 bet? After all, Gingrich is himself a rich man. …that was the whole point of Romney’s “attack.”
 
Romney is worth 250 million? I knew he was wealthy but not that wealthy. No wonder 10,000 dollars wasn’t a big deal for him. Then again, when Warren Buffet goes out to eat, he often orders the cheapest thing on the menu.
 
That is just because he was never as successful in the private sector as Gingrich or Romney.

That was not me. That would be the reply of either Gingrich or Romney should that ever be brought to America’s attention in a debate.
:rolleyes: That’s silly. No one gets attacked for a low net worth. IIRC his net worth is about the same as Obama’s.
 
:rolleyes: That’s silly. No one gets attacked for a low net worth. IIRC his net worth is about the same as Obama’s.
I meant if it was brought up in Paul’s favor and they had to counter it. Sort of like Romney countering Gingrich calling him out for only going into the private sector because he lost to Kennedy. I was just spinning it how they would. Maybe I should go into politics.😃
 
It hasn’t been overturned yet. So, “that little gem” is still in play. What is your point?
My point is that we have been waiting 38 years for it and we are no closer now than we were in 1973. The best shot we had was when Bush had a Republican House and Senate and it STILL didn’t happen. It was never even acted on. That was probably the best shot the GOP had and they blew it. It ain’t gonna happen as long as the Democrat Party is married to its support for abortion and Roe v. Wade.
 
My point is that we have been waiting 38 years for it and we are no closer now than we were in 1973. The best shot we had was when Bush had a Republican House and Senate and it STILL didn’t happen. It was never even acted on. That was probably the best shot the GOP had and they blew it. It ain’t gonna happen as long as the Democrat Party is married to its support for abortion and Roe v. Wade.
It has to be overturned by the Supreme Court. It has nothing to do with the control of Congress and the Presidency, other than getting the right justices on the bench. Then, a case has to make it to the Supreme Court.

The other option is to amend the Constitution, but that is an even higher hurdle. That’s why most everyone supports the two-step approach - overturn Roe v Wade (sending the issue back to the states), then work towards an amendment.
 
It has to be overturned by the Supreme Court. It has nothing to do with the control of Congress and the Presidency, other than getting the right justices on the bench. Then, a case has to make it to the Supreme Court.

The other option is to amend the Constitution, but that is an even higher hurdle. That’s why most everyone supports the two-step approach - overturn Roe v Wade (sending the issue back to the states), then work towards an amendment.
Ya, well, someone HAS to actually bring it before the Court. And Congress does have the authority under the Constitution to limit the scope of the Supreme Court.
 
Romney is worth 250 million? I knew he was wealthy but not that wealthy. No wonder 10,000 dollars wasn’t a big deal for him. Then again, when Warren Buffet goes out to eat, he often orders the cheapest thing on the menu.
$10,000 wouldn’t be a big deal for any of the candidates. That said, Romney was just using hyperbole to make his point. I guess he should have said 1 BILLION dollars (in a Dr Evil voice…with his pinky up to the corner of his mouth)…

It was only dumb to say on Romney’s behalf because he hadn’t counted on how much people blow inconsequential things up to be a big deal.
 
Yes, it’s crazy to not be nosy and not want to intervene in other countries affairs.
No, it’s crazy to say that any sovereign nation has the ‘right’ to have nuclear weapons. I think if we could ‘unring the bell’ and prevent the loon in No-Ko from having nukes or the Islamists in Pakistan, we would do it. Much easier to keep the genie in the bottle than try to get him back in once he gets out. Whatever we can do to keep the mullahs in Iran from getting their hands on a nuke is IMO a good thing for us and for the entire world. Paul acts as if there is no evil in the world and that if we just mind our own business, everyone else will do the same. History debunks that theory.

I think there is a good middle ground between folding our tents and coming home from every corner of the globe,and providing a strong defense of both ourselves and others. There is a deterrent effect of some of our troops’ installations in certain ‘hot spots’ around the world. And I hope I never see the day when the USA refuses to “intervene” in a humanitarin crisis.

I think Rep Paul is too far off the edge of non-intervention because we do have interests that extend beyond our borders. His policies IMO are dangerous.

Lisa
 
$10,000 wouldn’t be a big deal for any of the candidates. That said, Romney was just using hyperbole to make his point. I guess he should have said 1 BILLION dollars (in a Dr Evil voice…with his pinky up to the corner of his mouth)…

It was only dumb to say on Romney’s behalf because he hadn’t counted on how much people blow inconsequential things up to be a big deal.
Well certainly 10,000 dollars would mean more to someone like Paul than someone like Romney.

He shouldn’t have said 10,000 dollars because it is really realistic. Even Perry was taken off guard at the moment.

If someone says something and I say I will bet you a million dollars, then that is a way of saying I know that I am right. However, if I say I will bet you ten dollars, that is a real bet if accepted. Romney was betting 1/25,000 of his net worth.

Just doing the math, that would be the equivalent of a person with a net worth of 125,000 dollars betting five dollars. Or someone with a net worth of 250,000 betting 10 dollars. My point is it is highly likely that he would have made that bet as freely as I would be willing to make a 10, 15, or even 20 dollar bet.
 
Ron Paul is another John McCain. He can’t win. His foreign policy stances are crazy. When he stands up to talk he stutters on and on, making it up as he goes along. Not only that he says things out of the blue that are dangerous. Obama will egg him on just to get him to look like he needs his pills and it will probably work.
I can not believe some are complaining about Newt’s unpredictability, look at Ron Paul!
 
Well certainly 10,000 dollars would mean more to someone like Paul than someone like Romney.

He shouldn’t have said 10,000 dollars because it is really realistic. Even Perry was taken off guard at the moment.

If someone says something and I say I will bet you a million dollars, then that is a way of saying I know that I am right. However, if I say I will bet you ten dollars, that is a real bet if accepted. Romney was betting 1/25,000 of his net worth.

Just doing the math, that would be the equivalent of a person with a net worth of 125,000 dollars betting five dollars. Or someone with a net worth of 250,000 betting 10 dollars. My point is it is highly likely that he would have made that bet as freely as I would be willing to make a 10, 15, or even 20 dollar bet.
Honestly I am amazed that people take this so seriously. I believe it was just an off the cuff remark, not intended seriously as a bet but at a level to show he was confident that he was correct about the book.

It’s funny what remark or perceived gaffe gets all the ink. This was meaningless to me and I think only the MSM ginning it up to get more eyeballs on their “news” shows. Is this truly a concern? Are we unaware that Mitt (and the rest of the field) has substantial wealth? Now we’ve got Newt and Mitt slinging mud about Tiffany’s bills and Mitt’s ‘bankrupting everyone’ during his tenure at Bain Capital. Neither is relevant to the race. The election isn’t the latest reality show. If silly overblown drama is what people want stick to the Kardashians.

Lisa
 
Honestly I am amazed that people take this so seriously. I believe it was just an off the cuff remark, not intended seriously as a bet but at a level to show he was confident that he was correct about the book.

It’s funny what remark or perceived gaffe gets all the ink. This was meaningless to me and I think only the MSM ginning it up to get more eyeballs on their “news” shows. Is this truly a concern? Are we unaware that Mitt (and the rest of the field) has substantial wealth? Now we’ve got Newt and Mitt slinging mud about Tiffany’s bills and Mitt’s ‘bankrupting everyone’ during his tenure at Bain Capital. Neither is relevant to the race. The election isn’t the latest reality show. If silly overblown drama is what people want stick to the Kardashians.

Lisa
Personally I don’t care. I wouldn’t care if he actually bet 10,000 or a million, or even 10 million. It is his money. He earned it.

My point is that is probably offensive to the family who makes 10,000 dollars per year. That to them, what could conceivably be a bet to him would be the equivalent of betting their lives. It just wasn’t the right thing to say. It opened a door for a quarter of Americans to be offended.
 
Personally I don’t care. I wouldn’t care if he actually bet 10,000 or a million, or even 10 million. It is his money. He earned it.

My point is that is probably offensive to the family who makes 10,000 dollars per year. That to them, what could conceivably be a bet to him would be the equivalent of betting their lives. It just wasn’t the right thing to say. It opened a door for a quarter of Americans to be offended.
Really? I understand your point, just think that people LOOK for reasons to be offended thanks to the media blowing sound bites out of all proportion… Our politically correct society has raised this to an art form… making mountains out of molehills. I doubt if many were TRULY offended by the remark, but when told they SHOULD be offended stomp off in high dudgeon. The Victimization Complex is ruining this country.

Not directing this to you personally, just the way this entire campaign has gone, every week we have the latest comment that has killed X or Y’s campaign. It’s getting very tiresome.

Lisa
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top