December Republican Primary Poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Rick Santorum is the best overall candidate, and my preference, but I think Ron Paul would be a good choice as well, if he truly gets rid of what he says needs to be gone. I would never vote for Mitt Romney or Jon Huntsman period, and Herman Cain is no longer in the race.

By the way for all of you, Mitt Romney is PRO-ABORTION. In his ‘Romney-care’, you can get $50 co-pay abortions, which is what Obama-care was based off of.

Also, Rick Santorum is the only Catholic candidate.
I cannot consider Newt Gingrich a Catholic when he says life does not begin a conception. This is the belief “Morning After” and other birth control pill makers hold.
So, whom will you vote for in the general election, when either Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney win the nomination?
 
Mitt Romney declined Newt’s invitation to a Lincoln-Douglas style debate. I think Romney doesn’t want to do any one on ones or anything where there isn’t at least 6 other candidates around because he looks better beside them (as Jon Stewart calls it, “The Marilyn Munster Effect”). One of his only one on one interviews on Fox least week didn’t go so well because the interviewer, “gasp”, asked him about his positions and past history and didn’t let Romney disown it by saying the facts “aren’t accurate.”

Huntsman accepted Newt’s offer to a debate. I’d like to see this. These are two of the only three people running I like. I hope it will give Huntsman a boost in the polls, I think he is a good candidate and someone I can happily vote for.
 
Mitt Romney declined Newt’s invitation to a Lincoln-Douglas style debate. I think Romney doesn’t want to do any one on ones or anything where there isn’t at least 6 other candidates around because he looks better beside them (as Jon Stewart calls it, “The Marilyn Munster Effect”). One of his only one on one interviews on Fox least week didn’t go so well because the interviewer, “gasp”, asked him about his positions and past history and didn’t let Romney disown it by saying the facts “aren’t accurate.”

Huntsman accepted Newt’s offer to a debate. I’d like to see this. These are two of the only three people running I like. I hope it will give Huntsman a boost in the polls, I think he is a good candidate and someone I can happily vote for.
That would be interesting. It would help Huntsman tremendously, as he is viewed as Romney-light.
 
Mitt Romney declined Newt’s invitation to a Lincoln-Douglas style debate. I think Romney doesn’t want to do any one on ones or anything where there isn’t at least 6 other candidates around because he looks better beside them (as Jon Stewart calls it, “The Marilyn Munster Effect”). One of his only one on one interviews on Fox least week didn’t go so well because the interviewer, “gasp”, asked him about his positions and past history and didn’t let Romney disown it by saying the facts “aren’t accurate.”

Huntsman accepted Newt’s offer to a debate. I’d like to see this. These are two of the only three people running I like. I hope it will give Huntsman a boost in the polls, I think he is a good candidate and someone I can happily vote for.
Romney is playing the game as if he is the front runner. Front runners don’t normally debate other candidates one on one because it tends to elevate the other candidate. It may be a good strategy for him.
 
Romney is playing the game as if he is the front runner. Front runners don’t normally debate other candidates one on one because it tends to elevate the other candidate. It may be a good strategy for him.
It might be…if he were still front runner. 😉 😛
 
It might be…if he were still front runner. 😉 😛
Oh, it’s a done deal. He’ll be The Flavor of The Week once again by January, once people realize Newt can’t beat Obama and the gravity of the election sinks in. 🙂
 
Oh, it’s a done deal. He’ll be The Flavor of The Week once again by January, once people realize Newt can’t beat Obama and the gravity of the election sinks in. 🙂
Are you a betting person? 😉
 
The quote, unquote “latest” is immaterial once January rolls around. And I question the wisdom of boarding the Titanic with so many icebergs (i.e., baggage) on the horizon.
What’s immaterial is just about every opinion out there because nobody really knows. I feel like I’m reading someones post whose sitting there hoping that if they keep telling themselves something that it will/will not happen that the opposite will actually take place.
 
What’s immaterial is just about every opinion out there because nobody really knows. I feel like I’m reading someones post whose sitting there hoping that if they keep telling themselves something that it will/will not happen that the opposite will actually take place.
Join me in voting for generic Republican. He will cream Obama in the general election.
 
So, whom will you vote for in the general election, when either Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney win the nomination?
I would vote for Gingrich in a general election, but I would not vote for Mitt Romney voluntarily nor by bribes of money. Not only is he pro-abortion, he doesn’t have any answers for the problems we have. Only a strong, moral, Christian even has a chance to dig us out.

Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face - Ronald Reagan

[BIBLEDRB][/BIBLEDRB]
 
I would vote for Gingrich in a general election, but I would not vote for Mitt Romney voluntarily nor by bribes of money. Not only is he pro-abortion, he doesn’t have any answers for the problems we have. Only a strong, moral, Christian even has a chance to dig us out.

Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face - Ronald Reagan

[BIBLEDRB][/BIBLEDRB]
So you’d allow the pro-abortion, pro-Roe v WAde supreme court justice Obama to skate to re-election over Romney who has said that he’d nominate justices like Scalia and Alito? Who would you want deciding the Roe V Wade decision in a challenge, the Romney justices or the Obama justice?

Ishii
 
Despite Gingrich’s poll rise, he still faces major obstacles

Organization: “…he is scrambling madly to build the kind of organization that Mitt Romney has methodically put in place for a year, one that will let him compete through all 50 contests, often in multiple states at once.” - New York Times

He lacks support in Congress: “Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) said Sunday he would have difficulty supporting Newt Gingrich for president because of the way he wielded his leadership post nearly two decades ago in Congress.” - Politico

contrary to conventional wisdom, could Gingrich actually be a more formidable candidate than Romney?

“…some Democratic strategists worry that the combative Gingrich presents some challenges for the Obama campaign that would not exist if Romney were the GOP candidate. … Gingrich could pursue a strategy that combines energizing the conservative base and chipping away Democratic support among Hispanics — an electoral formula that helped George W. Bush win in 2004.” - Washington Post

the Romney camp certainly sees a grave threat

“The timing of Mr. Gingrich’s rise, just a month before the nomination voting starts, and his track record in national Republican politics make his a graver threat than earlier surges by Representative Michele Bachmann, Gov. Rick Perry of Texas and Herman Cain. That’s clear from Mr. Romney’s allusions to Mr. Gingrich, a former House speaker, as a “lifelong politician,” an “insider” and a “lobbyist”” - New York Times

“Mitt Romney’s campaign is revving up in the early primary and caucus states, especially in crucial New Hampshire, as fresh polling showed he could face a fight in all of them from a resurgent Newt Gingrich.” - WSJ ($)

Latest polling: Gingrich up in Iowa; Romney’s lead in NH narrows - CNN

But… “It is important to note, however, that Mr. Gingrich’s lead [in Iowa] is smaller than that of most candidates from past years. In the five prior cases where a candidate had a single-digit lead, he won twice but lost three times.” - Nate Silver

The race begins - the campaign ad wars get going in Iowa

“Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, who leads the Republican pack in the Hawkeye State, will release his first television ad Monday … Mitt Romney’s campaign announced last week that they would roll out their first advertisement, titled “The Right Answer,” in Iowa … Ron Paul… is pouring $429,000 in advertisements on broadcast and cable for two weeks … Perry’s most recent ad purchase totaled $89,000” - ABC News

Gingrich rolling out first Iowa ads today - New York Times

John McCain: The Hispanic vote is up for grabs in 2012

McCain John"The one-time Republican presidential hopeful, whose own 2008 candidacy was shaped in part by immigration, said that large Hispanic populations in his home state of Arizona and elsewhere are listening carefully to what Republican candidates have to say on immigration and could become a “major factor” in 2012." - Fox News
 
You guys do know that the American people don’t even vote for President it is actually the Electoral College that votes for President.

Your Electors vote for the Candidate who they wan’t to win.

For Example:
A Man votes and tells his elector to Vote Orange but the elector said he is still voting Yellow.

P.S.
Not all Republican views are Catholic
and not all Democrat views are Catholic.
 
You guys do know that the American people don’t even vote for President it is actually the Electoral College that votes for President.

Your Electors vote for the Candidate who they wan’t to win.

For Example:
A Man votes and tells his elector to Vote Orange but the elector said he is still voting Yellow.

P.S.
Not all Republican views are Catholic
and not all Democrat views are Catholic.
In Michigan that vote can be canceled if it’s not for the candidate that the elector pledged, and in 24 other states the elector can be punished if the vote is not given to the the candidate the elector pledged to vote for.

Never has an elector changed or canceled a vote and altered the outcome of an election.
 
You guys do know that the American people don’t even vote for President it is actually the Electoral College that votes for President.

Your Electors vote for the Candidate who they wan’t to win.

For Example:
A Man votes and tells his elector to Vote Orange but the elector said he is still voting Yellow.

P.S.
Not all Republican views are Catholic
and not all Democrat views are Catholic.
Yes, we know. Do you know of any cases where the electors have subverted the will of the people?

P.S.
Yes, we know.
 
Do you know of any cases where the electors have subverted the will of the people?
The only one I can think of was in 1972 when an elector pledged for Nixon and Agnew. When he placed his vote it was for Libertarian candidates John Hospers and Theodora “Tonie” Nathan. It was the first electoral vote to ever be cast for a female candidate.

When looking up the year I found this list on wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top