F
Fr_of_Jazz
Guest
Regarding Ex 20, perhaps we need a context alert. Verse 3 immediately preceding 20:4-5 is “You shall not have other gods besides me.” An idol was the presence of that god in pagan religious practice. Creating a idol was worshipping a god that did not exist or a demon.In the old testament it says we are not to make graven images, or bow down to them. How do catholics justify making there images of Jesus? I also see some protestants with images of jesus
In addition, those who rule out the use of images seem to be taking the command not to make idols more rigorously than the OT itself which in places commands the making of statues and the religious use of images.
Ex 25:18–20 – Two gold statues of angels were to be made to fit over the propitiatory of the ark. [Something in the heavens above.]
1 K 8:6ff – Two gold statues of angels were made to fit over the propitiatory of the ark in the temple [Something in the heavens above.]
1 Chr 28:18–19 ditto
1 K 6:29-35 - cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers carved on the side wall of the temple [Something in the heavens above and earth below.]
2 Chr 3:7 – ditto
Ezekiel 41:17–18 – describes carved images in the idealized temple he saw in a vision. [Things in the heavens above and on the earth below.]
Num 21:8–9 – the bronze serpent - [Something on the earth below.]
Idols are of persons or things that were not real: an image is of something real.
Anything with a body can be represented in art. To represent Jesus in art is to affirm the Incarnation.
Given that an idol (an image of a false/nonexistent god) is prohibited, what does that say about Jesus’ divinity if an image of Him is prohibited?
Given that an image of a pure spirit can’t be produced, what does it say about Jesus’ humanity if He can’t be represented in art?
Since we have bodies, the senses have a role in worship. The physical body of man participates as much in worship as does his soul.