F
FuzzyBunny116
Guest
How does one defend free will against claims that actions are all simply decided by upbringing, culture, genetics, (which I believe is determinism) etc?
Wow I am off the hook … nothing I do wrong is my fault. If you look at modern culture this is exaclty the mindset. To acknowledge free will you have to acknowledge sin (the misuse of free will). The acknowledgment of sin is not popular because it induces guilt and harms self esteem. In my opinion if no discussion of sin is brought into the equation then the defense will be short.How does one defend free will against claims that actions are all simply decided by upbringing, culture, genetics, (which I believe is determinism) etc?
Tendencies are certainly influenced by your environment. Some may tend to a life of crime because that is the only world they know. Pulling the trigger, however, is your free will decision and entirely subject to, at the very least, the laws of God written on every man’s heart.How does one defend free will against claims that actions are all simply decided by upbringing, culture, genetics, (which I believe is determinism) etc?
What if they believe that they are doing so as influenced by cultural factors, and they argue for free will in order to get rid of any responsibility they or others might have for their actions?The very fact that people seek to argue for or against free will demonstrates that, at the very least, everyone involved in the conversation really believes we have free will. Otherwise, what is the point of arguing?
– Mark L. Chance.
But that doesn’t make sense. If all choices are “completely and utterly” influenced by Factor X, then how is it that the person chooses to argue the proposition? How is it that he is consciously aware of making choices? How is that other people do the same thing? How is that people choose to act against Factor X? As to the last question, the answer is, “By choosing otherwise.”"There is no freedom of choice since all your choices are influenced completely and utterly. Hence there is no freedom of will only a conscious being who sees the outcome of an event in which there perception could not foretell.
We are all slaves to causality, how can it be any other way?"
What if they choose to act against it based on other influences?But that doesn’t make sense. If all choices are “completely and utterly” influenced by Factor X, then how is it that the person chooses to argue the proposition? How is it that he is consciously aware of making choices? How is that other people do the same thing? How is that people choose to act against Factor X? As to the last question, the answer is, “By choosing otherwise.”
IOW, no one can intelligently argue against free will. The very argument itself implicitly presupposes the initial proposition is false.
– Mark L. Chance.
So you choose … the concept of free will does not hinge on the number of choices just the choice. In your example God allows for A (good) and B (evil). You get to choose … I know I have a choice and am free to choose either.You can choose A or B… but God provided A and B for you to choose from… over simplified perhaps… but to demonstrate that we only think we have Free Will.
God has given us a glimpse so we can have some understanding of the Father. You must then deny Jesus and Sacred Scripture to make your statement. Those are the mechnasims God has given us into his essence. Complain to him that they are not enough.God is always in control, imagine yourself as a Gold Fish in a Bowl, you can swim left and right and go to and fro, the Gold fish does not have the intelligence to comprehend the limitations of the circumstances it is in.
Free will only asserts that we freely choose to by servants of God … and this only by God’s grace. Catholic doctrine does not say we save ourselves.The Doctrine of Free Will is a Doctrine of the Demon… designed to have people boasting before God that they saved themselves by an act of their own Free Will. The Reality is… All of Man kind and all of Creation is already reconciled back to God at the Cross… from here on in… it is just a matter of time before all come to the relisation of this simple truth… sooner for some later for others.
Peace
Everyone has a set of assumptions given them by society. The very intelligent or very well-educated are sometimes aware of some of these. However even very sophisticated people fall prey to intellectual fashion, all of the time.How does one defend free will against claims that actions are all simply decided by upbringing, culture, genetics, (which I believe is determinism) etc?
But that’s nothing but guess work. It’s a God-of-the-gaps argument, which ultimately isn’t any kind of argument at all. In essence, the arguer is simply saying, “There is no free will. Everything is conditioned because everything is conditioned.” It’s yet more nonsense.What if they choose to act against it based on other influences?
You sir are wrong. I’ve been predetermined to disgregard your excuse, and end this post with an angry smilie.Wow I am off the hook … nothing I do wrong is my fault.